Police were hammered at the Lwandle commission of inquiry on Thursday for failing to engage community leaders in an attempt to prevent the escalation of violence during evictions at the Lwandle informal settlement in June. Such a failure falls foul of the legal requirements for public order policing. By DANEEL KNOETZE for GROUND UP.
Police officers Lieutenant Colonel Jimmy Lucas and Captain Daniel Potgieter appeared before the inquiry on Thursday. They were questioned on the role of public order police (POP), in which they hold commanding positions, during the controversial evictions of hundreds of shackdwellers from land owned by the South African National Roads Agency Ltd (SANRAL) on 2 and 3 June. The evictions prompted violent clashes between POP members and protesting residents on both days.
Commissioner Nomhle Dambuza asked Potgieter whether he thought enough had been done by POP to ensure that “the use of force” was avoided and that the “highest degree of tolerance” was displayed to the crowd. Dambuza referenced the police’s national instruction (NI) for crowd management – a legal document prescribing how POP operations must be planned and performed.
The NI emphasises that the POP operational commander must attempt to “build trust” with the crowd and its representatives.
“The South African Police Service must, in partnership with the community, metropolitan police services and other agencies, devise effective methods to promote public safety, as well as reassuring the community that they are protected. To ensure this, the (police) must play a pro-active role in attempting to identify and defuse any possible conflict before it escalates into violence. This is to be done by communicating with the public, organisers, and participants,” reads a typical paragraph in the NI illustrating this emphasis on maintaining peace.
The NI also prescribes that the police should identify stakeholders who can play a role in “resolving the problem”. The police must bring these individuals together and engage in “conflict resolution processes to prevent any form of physical conflict or eruption of violence”.
In answering, Potgieter proceeded to give a descriptive account of what operational actions POP took on the second day of the evictions. The commission was shown a video in which a community leader, a bishop from Lwandle Methodist Church, who was not fully identified, tries to engage POP commander Captain Andre de Graaff.
The bishop asks what he can do to “help” the police to conduct their duties “in the most humane and compassionate way possible”. De Graaff does not take up this offer, and the conversation ends with De Graaff referring the priest to the police’s provincial media liaison, Lieutenant Colonel Andre Traut, who was not present on the scene.
“Why would a media liaison know better than (De Graaff) who is on the scene?” asked commissioner Annelize van Wyk. “Why couldn’t De Graaff engage with the bishop?”
In response to such questions, Potgieter said the police told the priest that action would be taken and that the priest was not prevented from communicating this to the crowd of protesting residents who had apparently been “passive” up to that point.
“Be honest,” retorted a visibly irritated Van Wyk. “It doesn’t help you one bit to defend the indefensible. You know and I know that you failed to adequately involve the ward councillor (Mbuyiselo Matha) on the first day and the bishop on the second day (in preventing an escalation of violence).”
Potgieter was standing in for De Graaff who is on leave and could not be at the commission. Commission chair Denzil Potgieter described De Graaff’s absence as “less than satisfactory”. DM
Photo: South Africans evicted from their land two weeks ago gather at a site to discuss their options after their homes were destroyed in Lwandle, Cape Town, South Africa, 18 June 2014. EPA/NIC BOTHMA
While we have your attention...
An increasingly rare commodity, quality independent journalism costs money - though not nearly as much as its absence.
Every article, every day, is our contribution to Defending Truth in South Africa. If you would like to join us on this mission, you could do much worse than support Daily Maverick's quest by becoming a Maverick Insider.
Click here to become a Maverick Insider and get a closer look at the Truth.
Burger King is called "Hungry Jack's" in Australia. This is due to one restaurant in Adelaide having already claimed the named Burger King.