Defend Truth

Opinionista

While people go hungry, others make unseemly profits – there is an obligation to share

mm

Zukiswa Pikoli is Daily Maverick's Managing Editor for Gauteng news and Maverick Citizen where she was previously a journalist and founding member of the civil society focused platform. Prior to this she worked in civil society as a communications and advocacy officer and has also worked in the publishing industry as an online editor.

The issue of hunger and nutrition needs to be at the centre of an effective social development plan in South Africa.

October marks Social Development Month. It is meant to reaffirm a commitment to taking care of our society’s most vulnerable.

On 16 October we also marked World Food Day, which aims to spotlight the millions of people around the world who cannot afford healthy and nutritious food and in effect are going hungry as a result of poverty, inequality and unemployment.

In South Africa it is estimated that one in every 10 people goes hungry every day and yet we are regarded as the most food-secure country in Africa. We produce enough food for everyone, but high food prices, unemployment and waste mean that people are locked out of being able to receive the food they need. Without an income, how can people be expected to access the nutrition and sustenance they need?

Our Constitution clearly states that “everyone has the right to have access to sufficient food and water” and that “the state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these rights”.

Read in Daily Maverick: “More progressive men need to speak out against the violent policing of women

Not having this basic necessity has the direct impact of physical and mental stunting, mental health anguish such as depression and anxiety, and poor physical health, which often contribute to locking people into a cycle of poverty.

Recently I had the opportunity to interview Hein Marais, a writer and researcher specialising in political economy, development and public health, to discuss his argument for a universal basic income (UBI). He made the rather interesting point that, in order for people to live a life that is free of humiliation, anxiety, panic and desperation, we cannot rely on wage work.


Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations


“I would argue that it’s even more than a right… there is a basis in our Constitution to flesh out this right that would lead to a [UBI] being something that we can say is rightfully ours… a payment that is owed to everyone in society; that the wealth society produces and generates is not something produced by individuals, and that wealth is in fact a common wealth to which we are, in some small measure – and UBI is a small measure – entitled,” said Marais.

This would mean accepting that everyone is entitled to have at least a living income from the government that acknowledges the inherent inequality in our society, with just more than 10% of our people not being able to feed themselves and more than 30% being unemployed because there simply are no jobs. However, the issue of hunger and nutrition needs to be at the centre of an effective social development plan.

Read in Daily Maverick: “The disconnectedness of the virtual world has robbed us of patience and compassion

The Department of Social Development introduced the Social Relief of Distress grant as a result of the ravages of Covid-19. However, it is debatable whether the amount is adequate and whether its accessibility, being based on a means test, is the right way to determine beneficiaries.

This has also prompted discussions of a more permanent solution in the vein of what Marais is proposing, but we also need to acknowledge that, while others languish in hunger and poverty, there are those who continue to make unseemly profits and as a result have an obligation to share those dividends with those who have nothing. DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R25.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Karl Sittlinger says:

    Before an income grant or NHI can be implemented, we first need to get corruption and wastage sorted. There cannot be any additional taxes until we start using the money we have properly. And that should not be blamed on the successful, but on the ANC. If the economy does not pick up, any social help will collapse very soon after its implemented.

  • Malcolm McManus says:

    Charity comes from the heart. Unfortunately there are too many takers and they expect it as the norm without wanting to work for it. I give daily, but have often been insulted by the very people I give to on the days I am unable to give. Apparently God will punish me for when I am unable to give.

  • Malcolm McManus says:

    High time for Dischem CEO’s & senior management to start handing out to the poor.

  • Thomas Cleghorn says:

    Some might say that society is already contributing quite a lot but, that the distribution network is failing… Unless we can sort out our bureaucratic systems all planning is doomed.

  • Miles Japhet says:

    We have a desperate economic situation precsly beciayse acadmics and politicians have meddeld with the free market system. Quite simply they have disncientivsed thos wwith the exoperince, aptitude and ability to take risk and to create wealth. Without this there are no jobs for others. The state then reaps the reward of a growing economy the extensive tax system and should be redirecting this into quality education, healthcare and other social services. Teaching a man to fish is way better than giving a man a fish.
    When company’s lose money, does the writer propose that the state gives them money if they are expected to shre their profits with the poor beyond the taxes they already pay?

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    Unseemly profits are shared – it’s called tax!
    What would really help the poor and the hungry would be the following:
    – getting rid of racist BEE policies to encourage investment resulting in more tax revenue and jobs
    – a decent standard of education
    – birth control so that the kids that are born stand a chance
    – encouraging the value of family where both parents are responsible for the family unit and not the State( and taxpayer)
    – a governing party that isn’t just interested in enriching themselves and stealing from the taxpayer but actually cares about its people.
    Just my opinion.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

Premier Debate: Gauten Edition Banner

Join the Gauteng Premier Debate.

On 9 May 2024, The Forum in Bryanston will transform into a battleground for visions, solutions and, dare we say, some spicy debates as we launch the inaugural Daily Maverick Debates series.

We’re talking about the top premier candidates from Gauteng debating as they battle it out for your attention and, ultimately, your vote.