Defend Truth


The handling of a false South African news report about 10 babies has set off alarm bells


Anton Harber is executive director of the Campaign for Free Expression.

South African newspaper proprietor Dr Iqbal Survé has long pushed the boundaries of credibility, but recently he crossed the line into full fantasy. Should South Africans pay any attention to Survé? And what is to be done with a rogue publisher?

These are the questions South Africans – particularly journalists – are asking after the owner of Sekunjalo Independent Newspaper’s recent media briefing.

Survé acquired Independent Newspapers, one of the country’s biggest and most respected newspaper groups, eight years ago. But under his leadership, the titles have been reduced to shadows of themselves.

Survé called the briefing to reveal the outcome of investigations into the story his newspapers ran in June claiming that a Tshwane woman had given birth to decuplets. He had promised his briefing would be “explosive” and it would implicate a number of senior people.

The story, written by Pretoria News editor Piet Rampedi, went viral around the world with the claim that the woman had broken all medical records by giving birth to 10 babies. The report fell apart when the newspaper could provide no evidence to back up the claim and it turned out that no  one – not even Rampedi, or the babies’ father – had seen them.

All the hospitals in the area denied knowledge of the births.

Rampedi stood his ground, though, and Survé backed him, though he instituted a total of four different investigations: by an independent advocate, his internal ombudsman, his editorial team and his investigative team.

At the briefing, it became clear why he needed multiple investigations: it was to allow him to treat the four reports like a smorgasbord from which he could pick and choose. He ignored Advocate Michael Donan’s independent investigation, which found that the report was irresponsible and Rampedi should face disciplinary action.

He also ignored his own ombudsman’s report, which called the story a “hoax”.

Instead he went on a rambling account in which he said two of the babies had died and the others had been “trafficked” in a conspiracy involving doctors, nurses, hospitals and social workers. He produced no evidence, but said the proof would emerge in a 10-part documentary series his team was producing over the coming weeks.

At the centre of the conspiracy was an unnamed “Nigerian doctor” who could no longer be found.

If this was not the owner of what was once the country’s largest newspaper group, nobody would pay any attention to such delusion. But all of his newspaper titles echoed his account, at least one television channel carried his media briefing live, and it trended on social media.

Anyone who pointed out that his claims had no credibility was mocked as racist or uncaring of trafficking victims.

Why does any of this matter?

As a media practitioner and commentator for over four decades, I am of the view that Survé is systematically destroying what used to be a serious, credible set of newspapers.

The destruction of a media house

There are 16 titles in the Independent Group. All have seen an almost total collapse of their circulation since Survé bought out the group in 2013.

Most newspapers across the world have lost readers, but few have shrunk as dramatically as each of his titles: the Pretoria News sells under 1,900 copies a day, down from 30,000; the Cape Argus is under 8,000 from a peak of nearly 80,000; the Cape Times under 9,000 from over 50,000; the Daily News 7,600; and the flagship The Star is below 15,000 when it was 220,000.

What used to be serious metropolitan voices are now at the scale of school news sheets.

This is tragic enough, but it is clear that Survé is also undermining the credibility of journalists and news outlets in general at a time when the industry is already in deep financial pain, and struggling to rebuild its standing.

He is fuelling a popular cynicism towards the media, creating a situation – as we have seen elsewhere – ripe for malicious malinformation and dangerous populism.

Two factors seem to allow him to keep going. The first is the Public Investment Corporation, which invests state pensions and appears unable to stop him abusing what’s left of the R4.2-billion it gave to his Ayo Technologies group or to call in its rights as shareholders. He has the corporation tied up in legal technicalities.

The second is that some major retail advertisers, short of regional outlets in which to promote their wares, continue to prop up these newspapers, despite their lack of audience.

The news media industry itself can only stand by and watch in dismay. The South African National Editors’ Forum pleaded with him to return to the voluntary self-regulatory industry framework, the Press Ombudsman and Council.

But he elected to set up his own, effectively making himself unaccountable and free to run rogue when it serves his purposes.

He has driven out from his newsrooms anyone who might be likely to stand up to him, and surrounded himself with sycophants and dependants.

A worrying development is the Gauteng provincial government instructing lawyers to sue him for defaming their health workers in his media briefing when he suggested doctors and nurses were involved in trafficking.

One can understand the frustration of not being able to take the matter to the Press Council. But using state resources to sue media is a worrying, often-abused process that sets a bad precedent.

Freedom of speech supporters were unhappy when president Jacob Zuma sued renowned South African cartoonist Zapiro. Journalists often protest against large corporates using their resources to bully their critics through malicious court action that is costly to defend. This is a wrongful use of state resources. Other ways should be found to deal with the rogue.

Government suing journalists and media houses provides a tool to harass and intimidate the media, and will have a chilling effect on critical reporting. DM168

This article was first published by The Conversation.

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper which is available for R25 at Pick n Pay, Exclusive Books and airport bookstores. For your nearest stockist, please click here.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    Perhaps that was his goal, to bring down reputable media houses! He’s destroyed public trust in them expertly. Congratulations Dr Surve. Unclear whose payroll you are on but they’re certainly getting their monies worth.

  • Richard Fitzpatrick says:

    I.O.L should be renamed as L. O. L!

  • James McQueQue says:

    Some of the publications are over 100 years old and he destroyed them in under a decade. No doubt he had support from some in the ANC.

  • Sydney Kaye says:

    And he is the media arm if the Zuma /RET faction, spreading fake news about the SIU when it nails one of them.

  • Coen Gous says:

    Prof., Anton, once again a very good analysis/article. However, the way I read it, the role of print news media will become irrelevant over time, with news primarily coming from electronic media. And then of course, online media platforms, such as DM and News24 online, and social media, in particular YouTube channels. Fake news is so much easier to spread in the latter two options, especially on social media. But even with online media there is an ever increasing possibility that fake news will be spread, especially so when readers can comment on articles posted. What makes it even worse, is that these media will use reader comments as a platform to increase the readership base, especially as readers have to pay a subscription fee to comment, and worse, to even have access to the news articles, such as News24 and some others, in the first place. The profit motive, or commercialization, can result in fake news be posted in order to increase both the subscription base and thus indirectly also advertising income.
    The Surve matter is of course also a criminal matter. And how he can still be around is beyond understanding. That can only point to a weakness in editorial control, but also with law enforcement agencies.

  • Heinrich Holt says:

    IOL; AYO; PIC; ANC; RET; EFF; ATM; FTS; WTF. The strategy is simple. Confuse (not always so informed) voters with TLA’s. R100 for the first correct guess for FTS….

  • Alley Cat says:

    So sad to see the demise of these once proud publications.
    Prof, great article BUT… you left out the fact that the journalists and likely sub editors have lost command of the English language (sadly News24 also has this problem). There are always numerous spelling and grammatical errors in their articles. Bad spelling is unforgivable as it indicates that these “journalists” are too lazy to perform a spell check.
    I remember when we were at school we were encouraged to read the Star newspaper to learn spelling and grammar now I would advise anyone to ban their children from reading it.
    When I see an article from IOL on my news feed, I move on lest my click gains this man additional advertising revenue.
    I also never buy from LOOT since I found out he owns that as well.
    And we all thought medical doctors had ethics? DISGRACEFUL!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted