First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We write for you

It’s a public service and we refuse to erect a paywall and force you to pay for truth. Instead, we ask (nicely and often) that those of you who can afford to, become a Maverick Insider and help with whatever you can. In order for truth not to become a thing of the past, we need to keep going.

Currently, 18,000 (or less than 0.3%) of our brave and generous readers are members; which says a lot about their characters and commitment to our country. These people are paying for a free service in order to keep it free for everyone.

They are the true South AfriCANs.(Sorry, we couldn’t help ourselves.)

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

In the name of history and identity: The power and poli...

Defend Truth


In the name of history and identity: The power and politics behind black people’s names


Zukiswa Pikoli is a journalist at Maverick Citizen.

I make it a point that when I meet people I introduce myself with my full name because, you know, it’s my name and it carries the hopes, dreams, aspirations and historical significance of the time in which I was born and by whom I was named ... my identity.

First published in the Daily Maverick 168 weekly newspaper.

Language is one of the most beautiful ways to express ourselves as people and to keep our culture alive. It can serve the purpose of inclusion and belonging but can sometimes be used for the purpose of exclusion and marginalisation. In South Africa, chapter 2 sections 30 and 31 of our Constitution guarantees our rights to practise and uphold our cultures and languages. What it does not do is guarantee the right to the assertion of one language or culture over another. That would be imperialistic.

One of the tactics of imperialism is the erasure of culture, and language asserting its dominance and enforcing assimilation.

We are emerging from a dark history where black people’s names were invalidated by white South Africans; dismissing them as too difficult and glibly replacing them with English and Afrikaans names of their choice so that they would not have to bother with learning to pronounce them. Put bluntly, black people do not have English and Afrikaans names out of choice but out of the need for economic survival because of our inherent master and slave dialectic.

Now admittedly, the world has been suffering through a pervasive and contrived social media-fuelled outrage and horror for a while now and so of course we’re constantly on guard and ever ready to roll our eyes at the latest benign offence and to dismiss it as such.

However, at the Film Industry Engagement ’21 on 8 September, where Cape Town alderman JP Smith dismissed Abongile Nzelenzele’s surname as too difficult to pronounce, was not that time.

Living in SA needs grit, humour and stamina, but as we all know, sometimes those reserves run low, particularly when resilience is required to be displayed disproportionately by only certain members of our society, who more often than not are black people, like me.

I make it a point that when I meet people I introduce myself with my full name because, you know, it’s my name and it carries the hopes, dreams, aspirations and historical significance of the time in which I was born and by whom I was named … my identity.

I was born in the ’80s, a time in which the country was experiencing its greatest turmoil, and if we are honest it is a wonder most of us black ’80s babies made it into adulthood, which, spoiler alert, also explains my name. My parents made a deliberate decision to give me only Xhosa names because they understood the deeply political nature of language and its use as a system of oppression in South Africa.

But back to Smith’s dismissal of Nzelenzele’s surname – “I’m not even gonna try that surname, dude. Too many vowels, too awkwardly placed” – after which he said Nzelenzele should have a “short, compact one like me, ‘Smith’”. The assertion here was that there is something wrong with Nzelenzele’s surname and he would therefore not bother to pronounce it.

What should our response be to such an assertion in 2021 in a country that seemingly embraces its cultural diversity? If we are to take it as a joke, we are then compelled to ask at whose expense the humour is, and why. Because it seems to me that it would be at Nzelenzele’s family’s expense – and why should we invest in that?

All of this, of course, in defence of the comfortability and easing of the guilty conscience of a man who, in a few seconds, made an entire family and history invisible?

So no, it’s not with faux outrage that we take exception to careless utterances like Smith’s, it’s because of our history. The fact that white people do not have to worry that someone at any point will simply decide not to recognise or ridicule their name or just simply assign them a new name is surely telling. Language has power and language is political, and chalking up Smith’s incident as a joke completely invalidates a person’s identity.

What Smith missed was an opportunity to learn and contribute to a discussion in a meaningful and socially empathetic and cohesive way. This is also evident in the response to the video, which was a short statement from his office as opposed to a personal response. It is also important for us as South Africans to reflect on our thoughts and feelings that may have been elicited by the incident and ask ourselves this question: while watching the video, did you identify with Smith’s assertion or were you repelled by it, and why?

Our Constitution can only go so far to safeguard our rights. It is up to us to live a life that mirrors the values of those rights.

So what’s in a name? Our identity, our belonging, our family, that’s what. DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper which is available for R25 at Pick n Pay, Exclusive Books and airport bookstores. For your nearest stockist, please click here.


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 5

  • Smith was and still is an idiot.

    “black” names do not have a monopoly over awkward! I have friends with “European” given names that a chameleon would trip over. They don’t have a chip on their shoulder about it.

  • Dear Zukiswa,
    I am sorry this has happened. Its unutterably crass.
    I am an Irish person and our names have the same lineage and meaning as yours, and our language too bears no resemblance to English. The feedback has been the same…..names must be somehow anglicised.
    But I know who I am, and where I come from, and for me that is what matters. 🙂

  • Energy should be spent on constructive stuff rather than the eternal dwelling on injustices. Where these occur treat the people with the contempt they deserve and move on.

  • The fear of mispronouncing unfamiliar letter groupings starts in primary school. Later we worry about not only seeming stupid but giving offence or being ridiculed. Definitely reading badly in public is anyone’s nightmare. I’ve met many people who distort misspell or mispronounce my surname Ambrose. I was amazed at first. Now I half expect it. The prevalence of this went down sharply for a while when a West Indian cricketers name became common parlance!
    So I guess this is a symptom of the bigger problem of a country full of people who are unfamiliar with each other’s languages and constantly confronted by what look like tongue twisters. Maybe we need to help each other over these hurdles rather than watch each other fall.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted