Defend Truth

Opinionista

Rich rewards: For Earth’s sake, let’s sue tone-deaf Bezos and loveless Trump

mm

Claire Martens is Senior Communications Officer at Natural Justice.

Every piece of plastic you recycled, every kilowatt of electricity you conserved, every time you chose not to fly… someone blows billions on blasting into space in a giant phallus. But I still fantasise about finding solutions.

There is a meme going around that goes: in South Africa in 2020 we only had one thing, the coronavirus, and we thought that was difficult enough. Now in 2021, we have rolling blackouts, looting, an attempted coup, rising unemployment, a failing economy and slow immunisation outputs and, still, the coronavirus. 

Of course, none of these problems is new… except maybe a coup attempt. 

Twenty-twenty-one also brought with it a billionaire in space. In a phallic space rocket. Jeff Bezos may not be the first rich person in space, but he is the first to fail to read the room. Inequality is driving us to hate the rich. I listened in disbelief as he thanked Amazon workers for putting him in space, his personal fortune having grown to a staggering $207-billion, even while news stories show how heartless and cruel his workspace policies can be.

I have long thought that events of the 21st century have the making of a truly great apocalypse film script. But that is making fun of events that are becoming increasingly real and unimaginably horrifying for millions of people across the world. Back home, the week of 12 July was traumatic in the worst ways. This is no longer reading classics and wondering at the similarities between the stories of Dune or 1984 or Handmaid’s Tale and the events of today – who were these soothsayers of old? What was science fiction a few decades ago is a real possibility today. 

This month has been tough, but not in the ways I expected. Staying hopeful has been tough, and grows tougher. It has been very cold these past few weeks and someone posted on a public Facebook group that we are experiencing the coldest temperatures since they can remember. Someone commented, “They call it global warming [laughing emoji]”, and my blood ran cold.

I wondered to myself: “How is it not obvious yet? How can people still think that climate change is not happening or that it is a joke?” I looked at the deluge of increasing environmental catastrophes. Climate change is not global warming, the term discarded a few years ago. Climate change is all around us. Over the past few weeks I have read news of runaway wildfires in Canada, Russia and the US. Flooding in Germany and China has killed a number of people. This is just this season, but catastrophes have been happening for many years – from billions of dead animals in Australia to the melting Arctic. The Amazon has reached a tipping point, producing more carbon than it absorbs. 

The coronavirus is just the tip of the iceberg (and how many of those will be left in three decades?) because I truly believe worse is to come. How can I have hope left? 

In this context, I hate to admit it, but Bezos made me cry. Lying in bed with my partner, trying to convince him there was no good reason to support Bezos’s desire to go to space (“but it was a childhood dream”), I burst into tears. For more than a decade I have devoted my career to human rights and environmental justice. There are days when it feels pointless. There are days when you stand in front of a community of people whose water has been poisoned and whose poverty has been heightened and who have lost faith in the government, and you feel like your explanation of the Right to a Healthy Environment is a stretch too far. There are no rights there, only suffering. 

You wonder why you are trying, what you are fighting for, when all you feel you have achieved is measured against the excesses of one man. He obliterates any small gain you made. Every piece of plastic you recycled, every kilowatt of electricity you conserved, every time you chose not to fly, every community you educated, every time you made a difference – there is someone else on the other side of the world making decisions that cancel every bit of progress you have made. It feels like a slap in the face.

I carry the stories of hundreds of people across South Africa who have stood in front of a room and told us of how their land has been taken and their resources have been destroyed. I have witnessed the pollution by our coal plants and the burning earth beneath our mines. I have seen the polluted waters and the tears of crying mothers. 

It is because I carry those stories that I know I have the capacity to love. But I know not everyone does – not anymore. Speaking to the therapist I go to, because Covid and climate change and decades of stories have sent me into a depression, we spoke about love. She told me how she looks at certain people and knows they do not have the capacity to love. “Trump is one example,” she tells me. “When I look at him, he looks calcified. He cannot love.”

The thing about love is that it makes you protective. And angry. I am not sad about Jeff Bezos and his rocket ship and the cost of that (a cool $5.5-billion, in case you were wondering). I am angry. Days after he shot himself into space, on 29 July it was announced that it was Earth Overshoot Day. We used all the resources needed to live sustainably on the planet for a year, in half that time. 

I am hopeless but I still harbour fantasies of finding solutions. I don’t mind being a little radical. So bear with me. We hate the rich. We joke that they should be eaten. I have a suggestion for you. How about we sue the rich. We claim damages for the “days of resources” they have taken from the Earth. We implement an individual carbon tax and tax them for the excessively and staggeringly carbon-intensive superyachts they favour. Maybe even charge them for crimes against humanity. 

I have always hoped that the notion of consumer activism would make a difference, considering that the main culprits of human rights abuses, environmental degradation, resource extraction and carbon emissions are companies. But I know only a handful of people who actually care. If consumer boycotts really worked, then why is Bezos’s wealth increasing exponentially? But where the masses fail, perhaps just a few people can make a difference. Let us sue the rich and save the planet. Who’s with me?

To conclude, there is something I have to admit. I wrote this article after the argument around Bezos – although I am not clear what the argument was – was never reconciled with my partner. He continues to favour an “open mind” about what Bezos should be allowed to do with his money. He is also a huge fan of Daily Maverick, as are many rationally minded, liberal-oriented South Africans. I thought that if Daily Maverick would accept this piece of writing, and we question whether Bezos should be allowed his fantasies, even at the cost of our climate – and, I don’t know, future generations – then maybe I will get to win this one. DM/MC

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 6

  • Claire, you speak for many. The fact that our government doesn’t hear us will eventually destroy it and them and probably us too and those we love. But that doesn’t mean our striving is in vain because the more we reflect back to those who damage us and our world – like the Durban pollution disaster today – the more obvious the solution becomes for everyone. Your passion for natural justice is what we need. The oppressive walls of ignorance, denial and downright criminal intent are crumbling. So thank you. We are better for you and your work.

  • Thank you, a great call for action. I hope that those of us with the energy, skills and courage read this and are encouraged as they take on the powerful. The good news for me is that the law is being used successfully in this struggle. Remember our government’s attempt to do a nuclear deal with Russia? That was stopped by a court case (although Mr Mantashe still had nuclear ambitions). The infamous power ship deal is being blocked by legal action, Shell Oil is subject to Netherlands court which will try to make the company reduce its emissions and those of its products (Scope 1, 3 and 3!) and many others. Although Shell is so far blithely ignoring the court case. What worries me is the way investors such as people paying into pension funds and RAs, are buffered from what their money is being used for – as long as they get a good return, the fact that their money might be being used for environmentally and socially destructive purposes doesn’t seem to matter. Sorry, that was a rant.

  • Glad this got into DM, Claire. It’s easy to ignore or miss the mental health costs of recognising and trying to stand up for what are potent challenges to our way of life and even existence at this point in time. I see some call it a ‘rant’ – as if these stresses somehow reflect a lack of proper thought, when proper thought makes it clear (cf. the latest IPCC report) that it is neither a rant nor a joke to express the pain and ambiguity of the moment–and note the complicity of powerful people in it (hence, yes, Bezos is part of the problem, as is reflected not just in Amazon’s serious disrespect for processes and people around it’s anchoring the Liesbeeck River development). I suspect part of the kind of resilience we as individuals, communities, societies and as a collective of human beings are going to need going into the future requires acknowledging all that you acknowledge. And challenge …. So thanks!
    Jim Cochrane