First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

The government’s fuel-related levies and taxes are un...

Defend Truth


The government’s fuel-related levies and taxes are unsustainable


Wayne Duvenage is a businessman and entrepreneur turned civil activist. Following former positions as CEO of AVIS and President of SA Vehicle Renting and Leasing Association, Duvenage has headed the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse since its inception in 2012.

Problems loom when the government applies short-term thinking on state revenue streams, which is evident from incessant increases applied to various taxes, especially those that appear to ignore future challenges that threaten its income.

There is a position that says more taxes aren’t necessarily a bad thing, as these are ploughed back into the infrastructure spending of a developmental state, which improves the economy. That’s true if it happens that way. Sadly, ours is often wasted through gross inefficiencies in leaky procurement processes that pay three times the price for infrastructure that we don’t often need, while a whole lot is lost to corruption.

The result is overspending and less delivery which stimulates the angry taxman to seek more revenue, often through a short-term mindset, by increasing taxes or borrowing more money, both of which can lead the country into a cul-de-sac of reduced prosperity and even that of a failed state. Of course, this depends on how exactly the money is spent and the value for taxes paid, as experienced by citizens.

Too often, the tax increase envelope is pushed too far and the purpose of specific taxes is lost or challenged, placing the state in a precarious position when income from existing or planned revenue streams begin to fail. Good examples include the SABC TV licenses and the Sanral e-toll scheme.

Reduced consumption of taxable goods, combined with technological and environmental changes, has and will continue to reduce some state revenues, which is a quandary that looms large for the various levies and taxes attached to the sale of petrol and diesel.

The price of petrol in South Africa is subject to not only the price of fuel when it lands in the country, but also by 11 other components lumped into the cost per litre of petrol and diesel sold to the consumer. All of these components, taken together, have a significant impact on the price of this important commodity. Retailers, wholesalers and logistics companies of all sorts absorb such growing costs by shifting it downstream — increasing the cost of living for all citizens.

When one looks back at the trends of these various “additional levies” and what lies ahead for the sale of petrol and diesel in a changing vehicle propulsion environment, these additional taxes and levies appear to be unsustainable. More worrying is the ratio of the Basic Fuel Price (BFP) versus these other levies and taxes in the total price of petrol. This ratio has become inverted over the past decade, suggesting that the state should heed the impact it is having on our competitiveness as a nation through the over-taxation of petrol.

To understand this a little better, the BFP fluctuates rather significantly monthly, due to the two influencing factors of the rand/dollar exchange rate and the international market price of Brent Crude oil. However, virtually all the other components making up the price of petrol and diesel are static on a monthly basis, barring an annual increase applied to the respective elements. Following years of constant increases, the total of these “additional levies” comprise the bulk of the price of fuel, which wasn’t the case not too long ago.

The annual average component of the BFP over the past 13 years is R6.00 per litre of petrol (95 ULP inland pump price). It is a component that has ranged between R4.10 on average in 2009/10 to R7.73 in the 2013/14 period. Obviously, when one looks at the BFP range variations on a monthly basis, this has fluctuated between R2.74 in January 2009 and again in May 2020 at the low end, to as high as R8.62/litre in March 2014 at the top end.

The graph below tells an interesting story about the growing impact of other charges, the first of which is evident in the year ending March 2009, whereby 40% (or R3.45) of the average price of petrol in that year (R8.71 a litre) was attributed to the sum of these additional levies and fees. The actual BFP of the commodity made up the other 60%. Twelve years later, that ratio has become inverted, with only 35% of the average price of R14.65 a litre in 2021 being attributable to the BFP (ie R5.10) and 65% to taxes and levies (R9.55).

Unsustainable tax revenues require innovative solutions

For a moment, in May 2020, the Basic Fuel price dropped to R2.75 due to low demand because of Covid-19 travel restrictions. This spiked the relative percentage of all other costs in the petrol price to just under 80%, and gives one an indication of what might lie ahead for the fuel price makeup — all taxes and very little paid for the actual commodity.

We already know that many developed countries have set clear strategies to halt the sale of new petrol- and diesel-powered vehicles, some as early as 2030 — less than nine years from now. While fossil-fuelled cars will still dominate for years to come, in most developed countries they will probably make up a small percentage of the car park by 2040. South Africa and other BRICS nations will probably follow this trend, albeit more slowly.

This means that the fuel levy (currently SARS’ fourth-largest revenue stream at R85-billion per annum) will start to dry up. Besides, as the conversion to electric vehicles (EVs) begins to grow over the decade ahead, the cost of generating fuel taxes will lean more heavily on the poorer sectors of society who will still make use of the older fossil fuel-powered vehicles (including taxis) for longer periods.

Some may believe the state will simply switch to taxing the EV industry to offset these lost fuel tax revenue streams. However, this will be extremely difficult because petrol-related revenues are taxes on consumption, while electric vehicles will generate much of their power from off-grid solar storage mechanisms (and not necessarily Eskom’s power), a decade from now. Besides, trying to slap another surcharge/tax on the consumption of electricity will have devastating consequences for the economy given the already overpriced cost thereof.

Furthermore, while vehicle accidents and injuries will continue to happen with EV transport, their contribution to the RAF levies will dry up. Currently, motorists and the transport industry contribute around R45 billion a year towards a very stretched fund that cannot keep pace with the claims against it. There is no solution to this growing problem, which is growing at a rate of more than R80-billion a year, another issue that requires urgent attention of the government.

The time for the state to review its incessant tax increases on various commodities is overdue. New, innovative taxes that will introduce sustainable revenue streams, while protecting the economy from tax saturation and stagflation, are required. The involvement of civil society is essential in this process, as the state is often blinkered and applies short-term thinking when exploring new revenue streams, as it did with the e-toll scheme and continues to do with SABC TV license fees.

Increased rates and taxes must be justified by demonstrably rational use. We have seen quite the opposite. Further, global environmental and technological changes that warrant a just transition to biophysical sustainability cannot be pitted against our leaking public purse.

The main levies attached to the sale of petrol and diesel:

  1. Fuel levy: This is a direct tax on motorists which is channelled straight to Treasury and is not ring-fenced for roads, as many believe. Initially justified as a user-pays levy to build road infrastructure, this income which now generates more than R85-billion a year, more than compensating for road construction and maintenance and is regarded as a soft-target tax on motorists who supposedly should be able to afford these taxes. The fuel levy at R1.27 in 2009 (15% of the price of petrol) now stands at R3.83 a litre (since April 2021), accounting for around 22% of the petrol price.
  2. The Road Accident Fund (RAF), which in 2009 made up 5% of the price of petrol and generated around R9-billion a year for vehicle-related injury compensation, now makes up 14% of the fuel price and pumps about R45-billion into the RAF. This specific “tax” has undergone a number of substantive increases (from 45c a litre in 2009 to R2.18 in April 2021), to keep pace with the growing demand on these lucrative revenues which are largely wasted due to inefficient administration, corruption and unscrupulous legal claims which RAF administrators are too weak to challenge.
  3. The other levies and fees go toward retail and wholesale margins, carbon tax, excise duties, transport and storage costs. These combined charges have increased from R1.72 a litre (20%) of the fuel price in 2009 to R3.80 (or 26%) by 2021. The Retail Margin (which goes to the petrol station management due to the regulated petrol price structure), has accounted for just over half of the “other levies” component of the fuel price. DM

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 5

  • The inelasticity of the fuel price makes it an easy source of short-term tax income. It does not remain a short-term strategy. Overusing this stream, linked with misappropriation is already critical. The shape of thing to come is even darker. SA must collapse if the cANCer continues much longer.

  • If I read you right the money must come from somewhere as it is needed, so perhaps the price of annual vehicle registration will then drastically rise? Or vehicle purchases will be taxed at a higher level? This might shift most into using public transport? Time to get back on my bicycle? 🙂

  • The user-pays principle is sound. If we all drive fewer km and use more fuel efficient vehicles that is good all around, except for government and oil companies.

    RAF needs drastic overhaul, scrap the compensation arguments and institute a table like exists with personal and disability insurance

  • Honest and efficient law enforcement will dramatically reduce the cost to RAF, due to less accidents. Not new and stricter laws, enforce the ones we have. Reckless driving is the order of the day in SA. Solid lines, stop streets, traffic lights, red lines etc. mean absolutely nothing. It’s mayhem.

  • Linked to your car license a driver should have to pay a personal accident liability insurance premium and then let the insurance companies manage the claims etc.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted