Defend Truth

Opinionista

View from Up Close: Why this plan is different

mm

Saul Musker works for the Project Management Office in the Presidency. He writes in his capacity as a South African.

South Africans are tired of endless policy documents, roadmaps and frameworks. So what makes the Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan different?

 

Full disclosure: Saul Musker works for the Project Management Office in the Presidency. 

We are a people with an apparently endless capacity for both hope and cynicism. This is one of our best qualities – it also makes life in South Africa something of a roller coaster.

Why should we be hopeful, and not cynical, about the Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan which President Cyril Ramaphosa announced to a joint sitting of Parliament on Thursday?

As many have pointed out, the plan includes a number of existing commitments, from energy reform to infrastructure investment. Some commentators have held this up as a weakness. Most of the same people would have complained if the plan was too new – “We don’t need more plans, we need to implement the ones we have!”

The truth is that we need a bit of both, and the plan represents exactly that. One of the important features of the plan, as the president’s address made clear, is that it selects a small number of mission-critical priorities from among the commitments of the National Development Plan and the State of the Nation Address earlier this year.

The difference lies in prioritisation and sequencing, two of the key ingredients for success. For many years, the government has lagged in implementation because of a dissipation of focus across too many competing issues, which has resulted in an inability to see the wood for the trees.

Another difference lies in the institutional mechanisms to ensure implementation. The recovery plan is backed by a National Economic Recovery Council, which will bring together the relevant members of Cabinet to facilitate rapid decision-making. This could be thought of as a “policy clearing mechanism”, enabling a determined focus on a few issues at a high enough level for decisions to be made and obstacles unblocked.

The plan is also empowered by dedicated capacity within the Presidency and National Treasury to drive implementation and accountability from the centre of government. Operation Vulindlela represents a “big push” to implement urgent reforms and monitor progress on key priorities, shifting from a compliance approach to an emphasis on outcomes and impact.

The Vulindlela team will report directly to the president and will advise the National Economic Recovery Council on decisions that need to be made and challenges or delays to be resolved. In this way, the mechanism combines technical capacity to execute complex reforms with political oversight to ensure that progress is made. Both are necessary for the recovery agenda to succeed.

So yes, there are some existing commitments in the plan. But these are the things that need to be done to place South Africa on a new growth trajectory. Implementation is make or break, and the mechanisms to do so are what count.

But the plan also contains new ideas to meet an unprecedented challenge. It would not be enough to simply dust off old plans, formulated before the global pandemic, and expect those to have the same effect in an entirely new context.

The employment stimulus is one of these new frontiers. In February this year, it would have been unthinkable to double the scale of public and social employment in the space of a few months – but this is what is being done to respond to massive job losses caused by the economic shock of the pandemic.

Again, the proof is in the doing. Each opportunity created or supported through the stimulus is fully funded, and most programmes have already begun implementation. 

The stimulus will support the expansion of many existing public employment programmes, such as our world-leading natural resource management programmes. And it will create new forms of employment where there is capacity to absorb labour – such as in the roughly 26,000 schools across the country, each of which can easily take on a handful of teaching and school assistants.

Importantly, it will go beyond traditional forms of public employment to support livelihoods in vulnerable sectors. This includes grant-making for the creative and cultural sector, where open calls for proposals will support artists and creators who have suffered a sudden loss of income. Early childhood development centres, most of which stopped receiving fees from parents during the lockdown, will also receive support to survive.

What South Africa does not need is a brand new plan. What we do need is to implement those existing commitments with the highest impact and respond to the immediate crisis through new forms of support and expanded social protection.

It is hard not to be cynical or impatient with the slow process of rebuilding a broken state.

But there is reason for hope, and cause to persevere. The best way for the government to regain public trust and convince the cynics is to demonstrate its capacity to implement a few things well.

That is exactly the point of the plan. DM

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • RICHARD Worthington says:

    It’s great to see such enthusiasm and certainly you point to some great opportunities.
    Have to ask re: “The recovery plan is backed by a National Economic Recovery Council….” Will this displace the Command Council? (and please not just rebrand it?)

  • Nic Tsangarakis says:

    Thanks Saul for you perspective. We can only hope that you’re right.

  • Alley Cat says:

    We wait in anticipation…. But after so many promises and false (no) starts I’m NOT holding my breath.. I hope I am proved wrong.

  • Rodney Weidemann says:

    What we really need to do is open up whole new economies to create employment – legalise the growth and sale of marijuana, completely. free up the thousands of poor subsistence farmers in Pondoland to begin growing crops that have monetary value (without the threat of police raids). Encourage ‘weed tourism’ (there are thousands of foreigners eager to come here and sample our fantastic genetics) – growers across the country can not only grow, but establish B&Bs to serve these tourists. Open up the way properly for serious medical research on the plant (if its legal, anyone can study it openly)….just imagine if weed turned out to hold the cure for cancer (or something similarly earth-shattering), and South Africa discovered it? Open up new, eco-friendly forms of manufacture – weed and hemp plants can be used for biofuel, for paper and textiles (and a hemp crop is ready for harvest in four months, as opposed to several years in the case of tree plantations) , it can grow almost anywhere, is eco-friendly (compared to logging), a single acre of hemp should produce as much fibre as two or three acres of cotton, and is stronger, softer and lasts twice as long. It can even be used to make building materials that are stronger, lighter, waterproof and fireproof. Also, don’t forget that hemp seed protein can be used to produce vegan-friendly, gluten-free foodstuffs in the same manner as soybeans…….The world is quickly catching on to the benefits offered by this miraculous plant – South Africa needs to get in on the ground floor of this new, green economy which is the way of the future, have no doubt. And what better way to do it than by using it as a springboard for the re-stimulation of our economy and the creation of thousands of jobs across multiple sectors?

  • Nick Poree Poree says:

    The private sector, as the only possible source of commercially sustainable work, appears to be totally ignored. Industry knows how to create jobs , if government will get out of the way, and change the ideology to make it worth employing people. Having a whole lot of programmes run by civil servants, is not going to get investment in productive enterprises to grow the economy. “Public and social ” employment amounts to extending the already bloated government payroll without any contribution to the economy. We will wait to hear where the Treasury is going to find the money to “double the scale of such employment” on top of the extension to social grants. The best way for the government to “regain public trust” is repeal a whole of crippling workplace legislation and cut our nine provincial and one national government down to size.

  • Rod Murphy says:

    The money will be stolen

  • Rudd van Deventer says:

    Nice to see some enthusiasm for the plan from inside the system. Hopefully, every effort will be made to stop the ‘rent-seekers’ normally associated with government initiatives who make sure that nothing happens till they have managed to slice out their piece of the pie!
    Lots of talk to date on the economy – hopefully, some real beneficial action now Saul, all the best with your efforts!

  • Angus Auchterlonie says:

    So yet another transformation program, co-ordinating committee, command council, implementing substructure etc.. etc.. This goverment spends more time setting up monitoring comittees than it does actually trying to run the country. The problem is that each one of these costs piles of money to set up, staff, house & monitor, before they’ve done an ounce of work! In fact, it seems that they spend more time thinking up new street names than they do actually working. Despite the fact that there may be a hint of reality in this NEW, IMPROVED PLAN, I’m afraid I’m even less convinced than the last plan, or was it the one before that, or the one before that …

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    Basically, Saul, nobody with any savvy believes you. You’re bought … don’t give up your day job.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted