Newsdeck
UN Security Council due to vote on lifting arms embargo on Somalia
UNITED NATIONS/NAIROBI, Nov 30 (Reuters) - The United Nations Security Council is due to vote on Friday to remove the final restrictions on weapons deliveries to Somalia's government and its security forces, diplomats said, more than 30 years after an arms embargo was first imposed on the country.
By Michelle Nichols and Giulia Paravicini
The council put the embargo on Somalia in 1992 to cut the flow of weapons to feuding warlords, who had ousted dictator Mohamed Siad Barre and plunged the Horn of Africa country into civil war.
The 15-member body is due to adopt two British-drafted resolutions on Friday, diplomats said – one to remove the full arms embargo on Somalia and another to reimpose an arms embargo on Al Qaeda-linked Al Shabaab militants.
One of the draft resolutions spells out that “for the avoidance of doubt, that there is no arms embargo on the Government of the Federal Republic of Somalia.”
It also expresses concern about the number of safe ammunition storage facilities in Somalia, and encourages the construction, refurbishment and use of safe ammunition depots across Somalia. It urges other countries to help.
Al Shabaab has been waging a brutal insurgency against the Somali government since 2006 to try to establish its own rule based on a strict interpretation of Islamic Sharia law.
Somalia’s government had long asked for the arms embargo to be removed so it could beef up its forces to take on the militants. The Security Council began to partially start lifting measures Somalia’s security forces in 2013.
President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud said last week that Somalia has one year to expel al Shabaab, with the deadline for remaining African Union peacekeepers to leave looming next December.
(Reporting by Michelle Nichols and Giulia Paravicini; editing by Grant McCool)
Of course the UK just wants to make billions out of the disgusting arms trade – nothing to do with any ideology, other than that of money. They really don’t care who wins in any conflict, as long as they can sell nicely packaged destruction, with death, injury and endless suffering just seen as the necessary collateral to profit-making .
The UN should not support providing weapons to Somalia as there is absolutely no way anyone can prevent those same weapons being supplied to Somali pirates which remains a blight within that region.