Maverick Life

THE CONVERSATION

Is red meat bad for you? And does it make a difference if it’s a processed burger or a lean steak?

Is red meat bad for you? And does it make a difference if it’s a processed burger or a lean steak?
Many dietary guidelines around the world now recommend limiting red meat consumption for environmental reasons. (Photo: Unsplash)

Most of us are vaguely aware we shouldn’t eat too much red meat, but why? And does the type of meat make a difference?

Research shows that regularly eating red meat can increase your risk of developing type 2 diabetes, heart disease and certain cancers. But is eating a beef burger worse for your health than eating a lean grass-fed steak? And how much red meat should we be eating?

Types of red meat

First of all, it’s good to clarify that red meat refers to all mammalian muscle meat. So that includes beef, lamb, pork, veal, mutton and goat. Then we can distinguish red meat types by how the animal has been raised and how the meat is processed.

Here are some key terms to know: Conventional meat, also called grain-fed, is meat from animals that are grass-fed for part of their lives and then given a grain-based diet for the remainder. Most red meat available in major supermarkets is grain-fed. Grass-fed meat comes from animals that have grazed on pasture for their entire lives. This means grass-fed meat tends to have higher levels of unsaturated fats than conventional meat, and this is why some research suggests it’s healthier. Grass-fed meat is also likely to cost more.

Organic meat is seen as a premium product as it has to meet government standards for organic produce. For example, meat labelled as organic cannot use synthetic pesticides or use hormones or antibiotics to stimulate growth. Processed meats have been preserved by smoking, curing or salting, or by adding chemical preservatives. Examples include sausages, ham, bacon and hot dogs.

What is the nutritional value of red meat?

Red meat contains many nutrients that are important for health, including protein, vitamin B12, iron and zinc. Red meat is a good source of iron and zinc as they are more easily absorbed by the body from meat than from plant foods.

Red meat is often high in saturated fats, but this can range widely from less than 1% to over 25% depending on the cut and whether it’s trimmed of fat or not. Minced meat typically ranges from 2% to 9% saturated fat depending on whether it’s extra lean or regular. To limit your intake of saturated fats, opt for leaner mince and leaner cuts of meat, such as pork tenderloins or beef steak with the fat trimmed off.

Wagyu beef (which simply translates to Wa = Japanese and Gyu = cow) has been touted as a healthier alternative to conventional red meat, as it tends to be higher in unsaturated fats. But research is limited, and ultimately it still contains saturated fat. Processed meats, such as bacon, salami and sausages, contain beneficial nutrients, but they are also high in saturated fat, sodium and contain preservatives.

Is red meat bad for your health? And does the type matter?

It’s widely reported eating too much red meat is bad for your health because it can increase your risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers. But most of the evidence for this comes from observational studies, which cannot determine whether red meat intake causes the condition. Most evidence is observational because it’s simply not ethical or feasible to ask someone to eat large amounts of meat every day for many years to see if they develop cancer.

So let’s take a look at the evidence:

  • Heart disease and type 2 diabetes: In a review of 37 observational studies, the authors found weak evidence of an association between eating unprocessed red meat and heart disease and type 2 diabetes. But for processed meat, a recent review showed that for each additional 50g of processed meat consumed per day, the risk of heart disease increased by 26% and the risk of type 2 diabetes increased by 44%, on average.
  • Cancer: Leading international organisations have declared there’s strong evidence consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of colorectal cancer. For example, in a study of nearly 500,000 people, each additional 50g of red meat consumed per day increased the risk of colorectal cancer by 18%. And each additional 25g of processed meat consumed per day, equivalent to a slice of ham, increased the risk by 19%. While research has linked consumption of red and processed meat with increased risk of other types of cancer, such as lung, pancreatic and breast, the evidence is not consistent.

It also matters how red meat is cooked. For example, cooking a steak over high heat, especially an open flame, chars the outside. This causes chemical compounds to form that has been shown to cause cancer in very high doses in animal models, and some studies in humans have found an association with increased cancer rates.

When it comes to how the animal was raised or its breed, based on current evidence, it’s unlikely the nutritional differences will have a substantial impact on human health. But research is limited in this area.

How much red meat should you eat?

Many dietary guidelines around the world now also recommend limiting red meat consumption for environmental reasons. To optimise both human nutrition and planetary health, the EAT-Lancet Commission recommends consuming no more than 98g a week of red meat and very low intakes of processed meat.

So what does all of this mean for your diet?

The bottom line is that red meat can still be enjoyed as part of a healthy diet, if not eaten in excess. Where possible, opt for unprocessed or lean cuts, and try to grill less and roast more. Consider swapping red meat for lean chicken or fish occasionally too. If you are looking for meat alternatives that are better for your health and the environment, minimally processed plant-based alternatives, such as tofu, beans and lentils, are great options. DM

This story was first published on The Conversation. Katherine Livingstone is an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Fellow and Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition at Deakin University.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Karl Sittlinger says:

    Some of the assumptions made in this article are being challenged by the science community. As mentioned, much of so called proof is observational. The entire food science industry has been caught with their pants down on some of their opinions in the past (example, frequently eating highly processed, low-fat foods may increase your risk of metabolic disorders, but for years was sold to us as healthy alternatives) and need to be looked at with some scepticism.

  • D'Esprit Dan says:

    I like red meat and have no intention of living to 150. Ditto red wine (just about any wine for that matter)

  • Terry Hodson says:

    We have been sold a lie about saturated fat and cholesterol for years. What is bad about red meat is its impact on the planet.

  • Brian Kritzinger says:

    The food industry, the research into foods and the public messaging around food is heavily influenced by the USDA, which in turn is heavily influenced by industry lobbyists. Large multinationals like Tyson Foods, Nestle, Coca-Cola, Pepsico, Kraft-Heinz etc. literally spend billions of dollars on lobbying American lawmakers and the USDA.

    Consequently the policies, information and messaging we receive as consumers is heavily influenced by business interests, often with public health as an afterthought (if at all). Sodium nitrite, for example, continues to be used as a colourant in processed meats contributing to the latter’s WHO classification as a Group 1 carcinogen (the same group as arsenic and plutonium for reference).

    What is beyond dispute however, is red meat’s significant environmental impact and wasteful resource inefficiency, which is a compelling reason to reduce or eliminate its intake if not for health reasons.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options