Our Burning Planet


Fikile Mbalula flipped a Sunday ‘ace’ card in the Karpowership poker saga, but does he have a winning hand?

Fikile Mbalula flipped a Sunday ‘ace’ card in the Karpowership poker saga, but does he have a winning hand?
Fikile Mbalula. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle) | Fatmagül Sultan floating power plant in Lebanon. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Nabil Mounzer) | Transnet chief executive Pepi Silinga. (Photo: Supplied)

Unperturbed by the concerns of the national harbour authority planners, former Transport Minister Fikile Mbalula signed a special directive ordering Transnet chief executive Pepi Silinga to make way for the Turks and their 49% local power partners for the next two decades.

In his last noteworthy act as the Minister of Transport, Fikile Mbalula interrupted his weekend to sign a crucial document to ensure that the Turkish-owned Karpowership group gets unfettered rights to park gas ships in three major harbours for 20 years.

Mbalula (now the ANC Secretary-General) signed the document on Sunday, 26 February 2023 – barely a week before he left his ministerial position following Cyril Ramaphosa’s Cabinet reshuffle and just nine days before the national department of Environmental Affairs issued a series of decisions which placed the multibillion-rand Karpowership environmental approval process in jeopardy. 

Perhaps more significantly, Mbalula signed the special directive just days after the Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) reiterated strong concerns that the Turkish powership project was in “direct conflict” with its own development plans for the Coega harbour.

This is because Karpowership wants to anchor three large power generation and gas supply ships in the same limited harbour space that Transnet has earmarked for a new general cargo berth and liquid bulk berths (A100) in the Coega industrial development zone.

However – Karpowership directives can only be issued by the Transport Minister to “safeguard national security” or to “promote the national, strategic or economic interests” of the country. 

Though Mbalula signed the document more than three months ago, a copy of the directive only came to light last week (31 May 2023) during a legal appeal process by Karpowership. 

Karpowership legal representative Adam Gunn says in his appeal papers that in addition to Mbalula’s special directive, the powership project has also been classified as a Strategic Integrated Project (SIP).

So, while there might have been “potential discrepancies” between the Karpowership and Transnet plans, Gunn argues that the Turkish plan should take precedence because “SIP projects are of national importance”.

He states that: “The Karpowership SA project team has been in active engagement with TNPA since being awarded Preferred Bidder status on 18 March 2021 … Various streams, dealing with technical, commercial, legal and environmental matters, have been put in place between TNPA and Karpowership. 

“Such engagements have been at a port level with TNPA representatives as well as on National level to ensure overall alignment with TNPA’s requirements.” 

During these engagements it was agreed that Karpowership could park its ships in Coega for between five to seven years – but then relocate its vessels to a new (unspecified location) “when and if the Port initiates a process to start developing the A100 berth”.

But statements by Transnet and the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and Environmental Affairs (DFFE) appear to contradict Gunn’s version.

For example, Transnet indicated on 13 December 2022 that it already had environmental approval to build new berths at Coega and “it must be registered that the Port development will take precedence over the (Karpowership) proposed operation”.

Powership plan was in ‘direct conflict’ with Transnet development plans

Transnet reiterated its concerns in a letter to the DFFE on 6 February 2023 that the powership plan was in “direct conflict” with Transnet development plans.

But just two weeks after Transnet’s letter was sent, Mbalula appears to have intervened and played his “ace card” – a special directive that effectively quashes any further dissent from the state-owned harbour entity.

According to Gunn, this directive is “binding and indissoluble”, and will permit the “unencumbered development of the Karpowership projects”. And, he said, it provides “a clear indication of the South African Government’s commitment to resolving the current energy crisis and support for the Karpowership projects that they are indeed to take place in the Ports and specifically in the Port of Ngqura”.

Gunn further suggests that “amicable discussions” are still under way between Transnet and Karpowership and he hints that a letter from TNPA chief Silinga could emerge shortly “confirming the amicable agreement for the citing [sic] of the Powerships”.

But questions are emerging now on whether Mbalula’s exercise of his extraordinary powers can be considered rational or reasonable in the context of “safeguarding national security” or promoting “the national, strategic or economic interests” of the country.

Dr Gary Koekemoer, a resident of Gqeberha and chairperson of the Algoa Bay branch of the Wildlife and Environment Society of South Africa (Wessa) said:

“It seems very obvious that as he was walking out the door, he [Mbalula] signs this directive and leaves it to his successor [new Transport Minister Sindisiwe Chikunga] to resolve the consequences.”

Koekemoer suggests that there are significant ramifications for Transnet related to the planning and relocation of other commercial operations around Gqeberha.

“We find it irregular that the Minister has simply issued the directive, seemingly without considering other developments taking place in the port. How can you develop the port when there are now three large ships in the way?”

Wessa had also submitted formal applications in terms of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act and the Promotion of Access to Information Act to access the full range of correspondence exchanged between Transnet, Karpowership, its environmental consultants (Triplo4) and other branches of government before critical decisions were taken to issue the Section 79 directive.

Wessa was also concerned that Karpowership and its consultants used the extended environmental impact assessment process to progressively finesse its applications.

“How many bites at the cherry will Karpowership be allowed?” he asked.

Several civil society groups raised similar concerns in a statement last week.

The South Durban Community Environmental Alliance, groundWork, The Green Connection, Natural Justice, and the Centre for Environmental Rights suggested the South African public should be wary of a deal that was punted as a silver bullet to ease rolling blackouts.

“[We] question government’s ongoing and unwavering support of Karpowership, because even though the company failed to meet so many crucial deadlines, government is still willing to bend over backwards to accommodate this Turkish-based company.

‘Having a R200-billion investment sail away in 20 years is not a legacy for the youth of South Africa’ 

“South Africans need to stand up and question why these powerships are being touted above all other options when it will not even address our energy crisis? The who, why and how needs to be publicly aired. Having a R200-billion investment sail away in 20 years is not a legacy for the youth of South Africa,” suggested groundWork spokesperson Yegeshni Moodley.

Responding to queries from Daily Maverick on 16 May, Transnet said it would be “premature” to express its views on Mbalula’s directive at this point.

“The port development plan aimed at accommodating additional and much-needed liquid bulk handling facilities at the Port of Ngqura’s A100 location will continue as planned, in support of the regional industrial sector. TNPA will continue to work with port stakeholders to ensure fairness and transparency in finding workable solutions.”

The national Transport department did not respond directly to our queries about the documented conflicts, but issued a media statement on 18 May declaring that the Minister of Transport was empowered to “approve applications of this nature”.  

“The Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) was consulted and supported the approval of the application. It is for this reason that the Minister gave the TNPA latitude to make necessary decisions in implementing this Directive, such as considering the safety measures and operationability of this Directive.” DM

Absa OBP

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Richard Bryant says:

    He did the same to the ANC when he signed. R100m contract for posters for their election. Then he denied it. Now he’s calling it fraud. Maybe someone somewhere should explain to this half wit about what happens when you signs contact. Start with reading it. And if you don’t understand it, ask someone else to explain it in simple language.

    But this idiot is like a peacock with a pen.

    • Jane Crankshaw says:

      Well said MrBryant. The blissful ignorance shown by the ANC decision makers makes one’s eyes water. As a taxpaying South African, I STRONGLY object to this particular project.
      Until taxpayers unite and object to the squandering and theft of our contributions, we will continue to be shafted by the ANC hierarchy as they feather their own nests and give not one toss for the majority they promised to uplift!

      • A Green says:

        Unless I am misunderstanding you, I don’t think taxpaying citizens should have more rights than other citizens. We should all unite. All our futures are at stake.

    • Egmont Rohwer says:

      Half wit??? No wit is probably nearer the truth

  • david clegg clegg says:

    It would be very helpful if DM could produce an article which deals with the conflict between reports that Karpowership has acknowledged that they are happy do discuss 5 year contracts, and other reports that government is continuing to pursue a 20 year deal. I have little problem with using gas (ours or someone else’s) to provide a temporary palliative to our electricity crisis — its not ideal but beggars can’t be choosers when it comes to balancing blackouts and climate change — so a 5 year boost to our output sounds quite acceptable provided the rate for a short contract does not escalate to bizarre levels.
    So some feedback from government on this 20 year/5 year choice is called for.

    • Andrew S says:

      I agree. Politicians seldom look further ahead than their next election cycle, so why is the government hell-bent on a 20 year contract?

      • Jane Crankshaw says:

        ….because it’s been built into the “backhander” on an annual basis depending on how long we keep it going”. The Turks are not stupid, they’ve seen what happens when you pay your “commissions” upfront!!!!

      • Libby De Villiers says:

        Because there is more in it for Ramaphosa and his band of thieves. One can only try and imagine the corrupt payouts brokered around this pig-headed decision.
        No intelligent, honest person can cope with this recurring nightmare anymore.

      • Luan Sml says:

        I do believe it’s called a pension plan?
        Though most of these old geezers in politics stay at the trough until the very end… so a 5-year plan should be sufficient!

    • Trenton Carr says:

      I think the 5 year contracts are different, not a replacement, in other worss a smokescreen.

  • Charles Geffen says:

    The absence of transparency, accountability, and an efficient rule of law undermines the fundamental pillars of a functioning democracy, effectively granting the ruling party immunity. This situation is deeply shameful and calls for condemnation.

  • Hermann Funk says:

    It is tragic how these ANC b……d are robbing the country of its future.

  • Johan Buys says:

    in a set-aside review, a court will consider the rationality of the decision. Compared to the alternatives to gas ships, there are MANY options that are both faster and cheaper. Case closed.

  • Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso says:

    It strikes me as a complete joke to have Kapowership lawyers telling us South Africans what takes precedence in our own country – it is akin to a butcher explaining to a cow what is in its best interest as it listens to the strained tones of strangled mooing in the background.

    If the SA government want this then they need to take it honestly, openly and objectively through our country’s processes, otherwise it should not be entertained.

  • Laurence Erasmus says:

    Lawyers are going to get rich! This action by Mbalula is probably irrational and stands to be set aside upon a legal review.

  • Colleen Dardagan says:

    Is it true that Gwede Mantashe’s wife has a stake in this? What is so remarkable to me is how our government is so happy to make decisions that break rather than build, all these short term decisions for short term financial gains – enough already really.

    • Mark Marais says:

      This is clearly a “blackbox” solution where the ships will sail into harbour and relatively shortly, with minimal additional work needed, start producing power. So how then are the local partners going to contribute 49% of the value of the contract? Noting that beefing up the grid to allow for transmission of the generated power from the three harbours is not part of the Contract as far as we know. Or am I missing something?

  • Jon Quirk says:

    What on earth is F*k*l up to now? If you wanted an intelligent, informed solution, you would be better asking a stuffed teddy bear, so we can only assume that this, is final act as Transport minister is greasing palms – presumably at least the ANC’s and his? A peacock with a pen sums him up … Let us hope that the President of our country has the balls to sort out this shenanigan.

  • Gordon Bentley says:

    As a Taxpayer of many years, I object to a clown like Mbalula making decisions on my and other good people’s behalf. Also as I have said before, Mr FIX FOKOL, WITH FOKOL ABILITY, FOKOL BRAINS AND FOKOL APPLICABLE EDUCATION, Should not be Secretary General.
    What was the ANC and Ramaphosa thinking when they let him in to this portfolio????????

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.8% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.2% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.2% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.2%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options