South Africa


EC judge sets precedent with ‘therapy order’ for child rape victim

EC judge sets precedent with ‘therapy order’ for child rape victim
In terms of judicial norms and standards judgments in civil and criminal matters should generally not be reserved without a fixed date for being handed down. (Illustration: Lisa Nelson)

The ten-year-old minor will receive monthly therapy for two years.

An Eastern Cape high court judge has given judicial protection to a 10-year-old victim of rape, and made a “therapy order”, possibly unprecedented, that the child must receive monthly counselling for two years. Those responsible for counselling the child must report back to the court on progress every six months.

Judge Thandi Norman made the therapy order at the conclusion of the criminal trial in which the perpetrator, the 46-year-old uncle of the child, was convicted of raping her three times. He pleaded guilty and expressed remorse and was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.

Judge Norman noted that ordinarily in criminal proceedings once a sentence was imposed “that is the end of the trial”. “If nothing is said about the child victim other than condemning the unlawful act itself, the child will go back home with no support from the justice system,” she said.

She said criminal courts always had regard to the popularly known “triad” of principles when handing down sentences. These were the crime itself, the accused, and the interests of society. Children’s interests were lumped with “interests of society” and were not considered as a standalone principle, she said.

During the trial, Judge Norman heard evidence from Captain Eunice Jiya, a specialist forensic investigator who had interviewed the child and testified that the child needed therapy.

Judge Norman tasked Jiya with putting arrangements in place with the local department of social development for counselling sessions.

The State Advocate involved in the trial confirmed the arrangements and a schedule of the times and dates of therapy was prepared and handed in to the court.

Judge Norman confirmed with the child’s caregiver that she would take the child to the appointments and “abide by the order”. She also confirmed with the child’s father that he was able to pay the monthly R36 taxi fare to get the child to therapy and back.

The judge ordered when the first session should take place and that the social worker be entitled to arrange further sessions in the best interests of the child.

She also directed the regional service office manager at the department to arrange and manage the sessions and file progress reports with the court every six months. DM

First published by GroundUp.


[hearken id=”daily-maverick/9366″]



Comments - Please in order to comment.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options