First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

South Africa

LAND RESTITUTION

Yet more disappointment for District Six claimants as ‘safety hazards’ delay long-awaited return

The latest delay around the redevelopment of District Six concerns occupancy certificates. (Photo: Gallo Images/Die Burger/Jaco Marais)

As 2022 kicks off, claimants from District Six are still in the dark about when they can return to their beloved area. The latest delay concerns the issuing of occupancy certificates, which means the claimants cannot move into their new units.

The City of Cape Town says occupancy certificates for housing units built for Phase 3 of the District Six redevelopment cannot be issued fully yet due to safety concerns. 

The Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development has built 108 housing units in District Six so claimants can move back to the area from which they were removed under the Group Areas Act. In November 2018 at the Land Claims Court, Judge Jody Kollapen granted the District Six Working Committee a structural interdict, forcing the department (then the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform) to provide a plan and programme – with timelines and specific outlines – for costs and layouts for the redevelopment of District Six. In addition, the department needed to submit a progress plan to the court every three months. 

In its latest submission to the court at the end of December, the department said occupancy certificates were due to be issued by the City, but “concerns around inconsistent riser heights and balustrades are preventing the municipality from issuing full occupancy certificates, as these defects are considered to be safety hazards”.  

The Department of Rural Development and Land Reform announced that 108 housing units would be allocated to District Six claimants as part of the Phase 3 redevelopment of the area. (Photo: Gallo Images/Misha Jordaan)

Deputy mayor and mayoral committee member for spatial planning and environment Eddie Andrews confirmed this to Daily Maverick. In response to questions, Andrews explained that “an occupancy certificate can only be issued when all work is in compliance with the approved plans and the National Building Regulations”.

Andrews said all plans have been approved by the City, but some elements do not conform to the National Building Regulations. This “poses a danger to life”. However, the City had issued “permission to use” certificates for the majority of applications for units. In court papers, the department said these were issued on condition that all staircases and handrails are rectified or accounted for. The certificate is valid for 12 months, during which the defects must be rectified by the contractor. Andrews said work on the site by the department’s contractor has not yet been corrected. 

A construction site in District Six on 28 April 2020. (Photo by Gallo Images/Misha Jordaan)

The delay in fixing the defects and issuing the required certificates is the latest setback for District Six land claimants who opted for land restitution instead of financial compensation. The claimants, many of whom are elderly, have asked when they can return to District Six. In November 2021, before the Western Cape legislature, their children also questioned when their parents could move back to their beloved area. 

A week later, the department told Parliament that out of 108 claimants contacted for the units, only 88 have accepted dwellings, while another 20 units have not yet been taken due to family dissension. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 3

  • In my opinion if you cared about the citizens of south africa especially the old and frail,you would fast track a resolution.Especially as these inhabitants , legal occupiers were removed through a draconian system .Have you got no empathy,no emotional intelligence,why was there no inspections as the contractor neared completions.How do you get the anomaly that it falls short of requirements.This short sightedness ,is depriving aged,old ,frail people a feeling of content ,that at last they are back on there lawful property.Heartless ,uncaring comes to mind.I forgot politicians and councils serve for the betterment of society

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted