Our Burning Planet


Keeping it in the family: Outrage after Eastern Cape municipality resolves to sell land to councillors and officials only

Keeping it in the family: Outrage after Eastern Cape municipality resolves to sell land to councillors and officials only
Extension 5 in Elliotdale. (Image: Supplied)

Residents of Elliotdale in the Mbhashe Local Municipality in the Eastern Cape are outraged about a council resolution that will see municipal-owned land in the area being sold to councillors and officials only.

Elliotdale resident Vuyani Macotha told Daily Maverick that the Mbhashe municipality’s decision to dispose of the 107 erven by selling them to councillors and officials was against the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA) and the municipality’s land disposal policy.

“No means tests were done to determine whether the land is needed by the community, and the community was disadvantaged,” he said 

Macotha said the MFMA is clear that no councillor or official is allowed to do business with the municipality or state.

“This constitutes a crime committed by all those who took the decision,” he said, adding that in the Constitution, everyone has a right to housing, but that right is being denied to the community of Elliotdale by the council itself.

“This is pure crime and looting of resources for the community done by people who are blowing their own trumpet,” Macotha said.

The resolution to sell 107 vacant erven in Extension 5 township in Elliotdale to interested municipal employees and councillors was taken on 25 August.

According to the council agenda seen by Daily Maverick, the minimum value of the properties is between R30,000 to R50,000 and the municipality will only accept cash payments. 

Another Elliotdale resident, Vuyisa Malangeni, said the manner in which the issue has been dealt with is alarming.

“To stipulate ‘to interested employees and councillors’ only may open up room for exclusion of the people not mentioned (the general public). The nature of this matter is of public interest and therefore should have been made public and transparent, but very few people know about this,” he said.

Malangeni said Mbhashe councillors are divided on the resolution.

“The Municipal Finance Management Act doesn’t allow this. The same municipality didn’t use a resolution of this kind when they were selling similar portions of land around Dutywa, and the question is, why have they changed their tune when they come to Elliotdale?”

Malangeni said this is a ploy to prevent the people of Elliotdale from getting land around their own town, and to only allow people with deep pockets to own this land.

“Even if the people of Elliotdale were allowed to buy land in this area, they couldn’t – according to this resolution the cheapest piece of land far from town is R30,000 and the piece closest to town is R80,000 upfront… the people of Elliotdale don’t have such money in their pockets,” Malangeni said.

He said he has his lawyers on standby to take the matter to court if need be. “I am ready for any kind of victimisation, vilification and abuse.”

UDM councillor in the Mbhashe Local Municipality, Nkosinathi Ndlodaka wrote to Eastern Cape Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) MEC, Xolile Nqatha, asking for his intervention.

Nqatha’s spokesperson, Makhaya Komisa, confirmed that the office of the MEC had received a letter from the UDM alerting them to the resolution taken by Mbhashe municipality.

“This letter will go through internal processes of the department with the aim of resolving the matter,” he said.

Mbhashe council speaker Babalwa Majavu on Sunday denied that council took such a resolution.

“That was not a council resolution, but it was interpreted as if it was,” she said. But municipal manager Mkhululi Nako contradicted Majavu, confirming that the resolution was indeed taken during that council meeting.

“A resolution was taken by council to dispose of vacant residential land to interested members of the public, interested councillors and municipal officials. The vacant municipal residential land in Elliotdale includes (Ext 5-107 erven and Ext 06-585 erven) which are disposed for sale to interested members of the public, councillors and officials,” Nako said. 

He said the land has been evaluated and was ready to be developed. 

“The positive impact for the development is to promote property ownership to the previously disadvantaged. This will also restrict land invaders from invading the council land in line with the Council Land Invasion Policy,” he said.

However, the UDM’s Nkosinathi Ndlodaka insisted the resolution was for the land to be sold to councillors and officials only.

“Council added that councillors be given a period of six months to pay for the erfs. The ANC has used its majority to pass this resolution which serves their own nefarious goals. They made it possible for them and municipal officials to exclusively buy land in Elliotdale, Extension 5. This is despite the opposition’s threat to take legal action,” he said.

He added that the UDM condemns these “self-serving and corrupt acts”.

“It is naked theft of municipal property and resources in total disregard of procurement processes, the Municipal Finance Management Act, and the code of conduct for councillors that prohibit self-serving/enriching acts,” he said.

“The resolution is nothing but a typical example of self-serving behaviour and is the worst form of corruption. It falls foul of the procurement regulations and the Municipal Systems Act, as well as the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, and is prosecutable in the courts of law,” he said.

Ndlodaka said disciplinary processes needed to be pursued against the officials who orchestrated this.

“This entire situation is manifestly against the code of conduct for municipal staff members. You cannot incite mass looting of state resources and escape unpunished,” he said. DM/OBP

Absa OBP

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    ANC has no regard for the law – of which this is a manifest illustration.

  • virginia crawford says:

    Aloota continua

  • Ion Williams says:

    Politicians and lawyers doing what they do best… extracting value unethically, fraudulently and corruptly, value that they have not earned and at cost to others who created the value…

  • Rod H MacLeod says:

    So, where will the resident voters of Elliotdale place their crosses in the next elections? Any wild guesses? I’m afraid but I have no empathy with or sympathy for stupid voters.

  • Gerrie Pretorius Pretorius says:

    “This is pure crime and looting of resources for the community done by people who are blowing their own trumpet,” Macotha said. And yet, I suspect that Macotha will vote anc again in the next election.

  • James Harrison says:

    This is so outrageous it takes my breath away. What will be done to stop the criminality of the ANC???

  • André van Niekerk says:

    This is simply illegal, end of story. A council may not take illegal decisions, so this matter needs to be raised at the appropriate levels and the resolution rescinded or declared illegal. End of story. The Town Manager should be taken to court for deliberately trying to pass an illegal resolution; at the very least charged with incompetence an / or attempted fraud. This is very simply against the MFMA and the AG and National Treasury informed. It should be very easy to get a court order against this proposed actin.

  • sl0m0 za says:

    This happens when people with no moral compass are in charge.

    • Charles Parr says:

      Yip, they never waste an opportunity to enrich themselves. I wonder who the community will vote for to represent them? I’d say that it’s a fair guess that nothing will change.

  • Thomas Cleghorn says:

    It’s important to find out if the resolution included “to interested members of the public” or was just council employees? More importantly, the council should be maximising the monies obtained from the selling of the assets, maybe even keeping an erf or two and developing them with the money. A school, creche, community centre or clinic even…wow, imagine…you may say I’m a dreamer….
    On another note, how hard is it to actually find out what resolution was passed by council? (Not implying DM not doing work, just general council chaos)

  • MIKE WEBB says:

    Yawn, and vote cANCer again Nov 1.

  • Jacques Wessels says:

    Is there a central database of all of this an similar instances, which can be turned into an infogram to inform voters on local, provincial & national levels. Only by informing the public & ensuring accountability by those implicated ( out voting ) will we stop the rod.

  • Sam Joubs says:

    The people from Elliotdale voted for them. They shouldn’t get upset now…

  • Chris 123 says:

    Things to come nationally if the new land law goes through. ANC one big looting scheme.

  • Caroline de Braganza says:

    Nothing the ANC does shocks me any more. I hope the legal system acts swiftly to stop this. Oh wait – their IT system was hacked.


    and so on … and so on …

  • Henry Diesveld Diesveld says:

    “…..and the municipality will only accept cash payments.” Good fiscal thinking, as probably only councillors and municipal officials have the means to get their hands on looted cash.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider