ANALYSIS

EFF’s existential long-term leadership woes

By Stephen Grootes 29 July 2021
Caption
CIC Julius Malema talks to delegates during a plenary session of the NPA. The EFF will on Sunday elect 35 additional members to form the party's central command team. This after the party's top 6 leadership was elected, uncontested late on Saturday evening. Julius Malema retained his position as commander-in-chief, Floyd Shivambu remained his deputy. Controversial Member of Parliament and head of the security unit known as the "defenders of the revolution" Marshall Dlamini was elected secretary-general; Mpumalanga's Poppy Mailola was elected as his deputy, while Veronica Mente from the Western Cape was elected national chairperson and newly appointed Member of Parliament and former party treasurer for Gauteng, Omphile Maotwe was elected as the treasurer general. The EFF is hosting its second national elective conference at Nasrec, Johannesburg. (Photo by Gallo Images/Alet Pretorius)

Earlier this week, the Economic Freedom Fighters celebrated its eighth birthday, claiming to have changed our politics permanently, and to be a government in waiting. That could, however, turn out to be a myopic view of reality.

Stephen Grootes

The party claims to be preparing to take over in national government and that it has unstoppable momentum, though that is what all opposition political parties claim from time to time.

An examination of the EFF’s role shows that it has indeed changed our politics, in some ways quite importantly. It has certainly reinvigorated Parliament and put other politicians under intense and sudden pressure when it was elected to Parliament in 2014, less than a year after being officially formed; former president Jacob Zuma found himself under a considerable spotlight.

The Fighters have also legitimised a brand of racial invective in which many are now allowed, enabled and sometimes encouraged to use their opponents’ racial identities as a political weapon. 

It is not yet clear if this is a permanent shift in our politics and if the dynamic will ever swing back.

It appears that the party’s main weaknesses may be the evidence of corruption against its top leaders and their incoming legal problems, and its apparent inability to build a new generation of leaders which could make it a sustainable force — though it also appears to be the ANC’s problem.

The EFF evokes a wide spectrum of reaction. Some will start from the belief that the party is the only body in our society prepared to take action against anti-black racism, that it will protect black people and make a real revolutionary change to our society.

Others will begin from the starting point that the EFF is not a political party, but a plain old criminal organisation dressed in red overalls, using racial issues to stir controversy while also functioning as a protection racket against big corporates.

The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leaders Julius Malema, Mbuyiseni Ndlozi and Floyd Shivambu during the party’s manifesto launch at the Giant Stadium on February 02, 2019 in Soshanguve, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sunday Times / Simphiwe Nkwali)

This extreme opinion around the party can sometimes cloud a hard-headed assessment.

Either way, it is undeniable that the party has had an important impact.

Ten years ago this writer suggested that one of the problems with the ANC’s decision to expel Malema from the party, and his position as ANC Youth League leader, was that it was losing its “safety valve”.

At the time, Malema was often used by the party to go to an area where people were protesting to listen to their concerns, feel their anger, speak of their problems within a community and then promise some kind of action. 

Back in 2011, I made this suggestion about the ANC: 

“It has now lost that valve. And as any steam engine driver will tell you, without that valve, you can run into trouble. But the ANC’s problem goes deeper than that. Instead of having a valve, the very instrument that used to cool things down now has a vested interest in adding on the pressure, in heating things up.”

The point was that in every way Malema now had an interest in actually turning the political temperature up as high as he could.

On the evidence so far, that may have been his strategy. He has regularly made comments which appear calculated to sow division.

He said that “it was not time to slaughter whites, yet”, that it was “time to cut the throat of whiteness”, claimed there is an “Indian cabal” and, last week, about police and soldiers in Phoenix, “let them go and find those Indian thugs and criminals who killed our people”.

Of course, Malema was speaking without presenting any evidence.

Even the dead have not been spared. 

Last week, on Kaya FM, he referred to the journalist Karima Brown who recently died from Covid-19. Malema said that “When the ANC destroyed me, Karima Brown, may her soul rest in peace, celebrated. Karima said on national TV “He’s finished! He’s finished! It will never happen!” I’m still here. She’s buried. Literally”. 

While words inflict their own violence and pain, Malema has also been charged with physical violence. He is accused of common assault for his actions against a white police officer during the funeral of Winnie Madikizela-Mandela.

His deputy, Floyd Nyiko Shivambu, also faces a charge of assaulting a white journalist in the Parliamentary precinct.

In the EFF world, words, phrases and even intentions that were previously not used in our political discussions have become commonplace. Many people make comments about white and Indian people on Twitter that appear to be inspired by him. Every person Malema & Co do not like is “racist”. Violent threats roll off his tongue with ease. 

While our society was always going to have difficult discussions around race for many years, the leader of a political constituency speaking in this way has opened the door for people to be targeted in a particular way.

The start of this was the use of the politics of spectacle, particularly in Parliament.

It may be difficult to imagine now, but before the 2014 elections which saw the EFF winning seats (after its election deposit was paid by the cigarette smuggler Adriano Mazotti), Parliament was a bit of a sleepy backwater that did not really matter. The seat of power was firmly in the ANC NEC.

Malema used Parliament to put pressure on then president Jacob Zuma. Less than a year after the EFF arrived, Zuma, and Speaker Baleke Mbete, used violence to remove the entire caucus on a night that saw a cellphone jammer used in the National Assembly.

Perhaps the worst image from that night was not the violence, but Zuma’s reaction immediately afterwards. He laughed.

While the EFF has been able to make these changes to our politics, which surely is an indication of its political power, the last eight years have also shown some important shortcomings.

One of the key tests of any political movement may be whether it is able to create leaders within it. Without this process, it cannot be sustainable. Here the EFF appears to have failed consistently and unless there is a U-turn it may not be a sustainable political force.

Perhaps the first high-profile person to leave was Mpho Ramakatsa shortly after the formation of the EFF (Ramakatsa has recently been back in the public eye because Ace Magashule used the legal case Ramakatsa won against the very same Magashule to argue he should not be suspended as ANC secretary-general).

Less than four years after the EFF first went to Parliament it emerged that more than 60% of its MPs had already been expelled, removed from their position or had left. 

Then Dr Mbyuseni Ndlozi, one of its most high-profile figures, became its spokesperson. He is no longer its spokesperson.

More recently, Mandisa Mashego left her position as chair of the EFF in Gauteng, after becoming one of the public faces of the party.

This huge turnover can damage the party, particularly when its secrets are spilt. 

In one case, a former member of the EFF’s Central Command Team, Theminkosi Rawula, posted on Facebook that Malema had tried to convince all of that body’s members to take “collective responsibility” for receiving money stolen from VBS. Last month the Supreme Court of Appeal found that Rawula’s claim could be true.

This again points to a consistent problem for Malema, going back to his days in the ANC Youth League. He has struggled to create a coherent system of leadership that could run a party without him and Shivambu. He has not allowed independent thinking within the party and to many, his control of the party appears to be cult-like.

He may also now find that certain longer-term strategies are beginning to place boundaries on his future behaviour.

When the EFF was launched, Malema made it clear that it was about land and expropriation without compensation; that land must be returned to the black people of South Africa.

Now, the ANC is in the process of passing a constitutional amendment to make that happen. Still, the EFF cannot agree with the ANC on what should happen afterwards (the ANC wants freehold title for land recipients, the EFF demands the outright nationalisation of all land).

If the Constitution is changed, Malema would lose the party’s main motivating force and he could no longer campaign on it. If he does not support the ANC he will be accused of hypocrisy.

Meanwhile, it is not clear if there is another long-term issue that could replace land as the messaging focal point. It is a fundamental issue in our politics. The EFF’s slogan in the 2019 election was “Land and Jobs Now”; perhaps it would now have to move even closer to espousing some faith-based socialist nirvana. 

Just as well, as the EFF has not yet made any suggestions on how to create jobs on a sustainable basis, in our current reality anyway.

However, all of these may not be the biggest risk to the EFF’s future. In fact, it is the proven and consistent claims of corruption against Malema and Shivambu, with their failure to help create sustainable leadership, that presents the Fighters’ greatest problem.

The evidence clearly shows that Malema personally spent money stolen from VBS. It was used for his personal gain.

VBS Theft, Money Laundering & Life’s Little Luxuries: Julius Malema’s time of spending dangerously

It is also clear that Shivambu received money from VBS. His brother Brian Shivambu has admitted, in a legal letter, that he received R4.55-million from VBS, saying that “there is no underlying basis for the payment of R4,550,000 and accordingly the amount of R4,550,000 must be repaid to Vele Investments”.

Floyd Shivambu’s brother quietly pays back R4.55m, admits he received the VBS money gratuitously

The EFF has not yet explained these payments or substantively disputed the mounting evidence against its leaders.

In politics, short-term victories can be important — they keep you alive, they help you to gather support, to build momentum. But over time, longer-term victories can be more important as they lead to proper fundamental changes to a country. 

There can be no doubt that the EFF has had an impact on South Africa. But has it actually changed the country in the longer term? That will depend on the party’s ability to outlive and transcend its leaders’ political and legal problems. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 5

  • Who has been financing the EFF? The matter is significantly under-reported. It is highly unlikely that the VBS matter was a once-off. It takes money not only to launch a party, but also to run it. Does the EFF get funding from outside of SA? Does it oblige its office-bearers to pay part of their income into its coffers in exchange for council jobs. (There is some evidence that, at least in some cases, ANC cadre deployees have had to agree to this.) There have also been credible suggestions that in municipal councils where it has shared power, a condition of its coalition partnering has been that a blind eye would be turned towards skimming off tenders. These matters should be investigated.

    • Perhaps the funds come from the same source as the RET faction of the ANC, the SSA. This is why Cyril’s clean-up of the security cluster is so important. Cut off the funds and the Gucci revolutionaries will wither away.

  • I’ve always wondered how a supposedly democratic body could name its leader Commander in Chief. Sounds to me more like a fascist movement, if the semantics are at all significant.

  • Where is Dr Mbyuseni Ndlozi, the now seemingly former spokesman of the EFF. He’s been quietly replaced without any explanation & has been largely missing in (in)action since then. Where is he? Lying low because of potential implication in some or other fraudulent endeavour/ criminal charge? Been expelled for becoming too popular because of his rather more fetching looks & personality & not inconsiderable intellectual capacity than either ol’ Julius Malema or his more portly Deputy, ol’ Floyd Sivambu or even the Eff’s verbal diarrhoea prone Dali Mpofu, who, I believe is the purported Chairman of the EFF – when he’s not defending the indefensible by resorting to argumentative conduct & losing his temper instead of just arguing legal precepts. Or has Dr Ndlozi decided to abandon ship, given the reports of ol’ Julius wanting the EFF to take “collective responsibility” (that hoary old chestnut) for the stolen funds from VBS that made their way into the EFF coffers – or was that the coffers of Malema & Shivambu – all so confusing, I know. Or is Dr Ndlozi perhaps engaged in post-doctoral studies on EWC? Does anyone know? Maybe time for some intrepid journalist to to do some investigating to reveal what the rather charming Dr Ndlozi is up to these days.

  • “The EFF has not yet explained these payments or substantively disputed the mounting evidence against its leaders.” This is not required. The eff leaders are all on the anc payroll. They are protected and are called upon when the attention needs to be diverted from the mainstream looters, the anc.

  • SCORPIO

    Blame me, not Mr Atul: Ronica Ragavan’s astonishing legal intervention to shield her Gupta boss

    By Jessica Bezuidenhout for Scorpio

    "The fall of one regime does not bring in a utopia. Rather, it opens the way for hard work and long efforts to build more just social, economic and political relationships and the eradication of other forms of injustices and oppression." ~ Gene Sharp