World

LETTER FROM AMERICA

Democracy is on the line in the United States

Democracy is on the line in the United States
Voters wait in a light rain to cast their votes for the 2020 presidential election at the Fairfax County Government Center in Fairfax, Virginia USA, 30 October 2020. Early voting in Virginia, which began on 18 September, ends on 31 October. EPA-EFE/JIM LO SCALZO

Like South Africans did in 1994, Americans are turning out in record numbers to cast their votes in 2020. Many of the people queueing in rain and in defiance of coronavirus risks, are driven by a slow-dawning realisation of how lopsided the polling system is, how captured by local partisans, how vulnerable, how mired in a legacy of racism.

It was a Wednesday, 27 April 1994, and in Mowbray, Cape Town, it rained softly on the line that stretched along the Liesbeek parkway from the polling place at the Gordons sports center. Buses arrived from the Cape Flats, where voting was even slower, swelling the crowd. We chatted and sheltered under bits of plastic, a game of rugby broke out in the drizzle. It was seven hours before we made it inside, and I lingered in the cardboard booth, making my mark in soft pencil, going over the lines to draw them thick and dark and unmistakable, but also to prolong the act of choice and consent that for the first time truly felt like citizenship.

In Brooklyn this week, it rained too, gentle and steady, on the socially distanced lines of early voters taking no chances with the pandemic, with the postal service, with their work schedules.

New York State is not in play in this presidential election, which means we see only a fraction of the political advertising that is bombarding Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida, and no visits from candidates. Ballots are unlikely to be much contested here, as they almost certainly will be in battleground states, by Republican officials and activists anxious to exclude from the count the postal and early votes they think will favor Joe Biden and Democratic candidates down the ticket. And yet the voters of New York lined up in their thousands, damp and masked.

“Vote!” exhort the signs in my neighbours’ windows. “Vote!” say the sandwich boards outside the coffee shop and the menswear boutique. “Vote!” say the skiers and cyclists in my Instagram feed, and the activists and parents, and artists. “Vote!”

Black Americans have always known the system was rigged against them. For whites, it was easy not to know, or simply not to care very much. Trump may have changed that for good by seeking to keep it that way.

Turnout in US elections has hovered around 55% of the voting-age population for a generation. The last time it nudged 60% was in 1968, the election perhaps most like this one in terms of its stakes, and of the issues in play. Those abysmal numbers suggest to many outside of the US a blithe carelessness with the country’s democracy, a sense that Americans take for granted their rights and freedoms, or don’t expect the alteration between parties to trouble their interests enough to get them to the polls.

The truth is much darker, and it is on naked display this election in a way that may at last bring sustained pressure for fundamental reforms in the voting system.

Around five million adult citizens are affected by state laws that disenfranchise convicted felons, often permanently. In the crucial battleground of Florida, where voters overwhelmingly agreed in 2018 to end the practice, Republican lawmakers gutted the change by imposing requirements that felons pay all outstanding fines and fees before they can have their rights restored. That probably leaves some 750,000 unable to vote in a state that could be decided by a much narrower margin.

These laws, of course, are the living embodiment of Jim Crow, created and now maintained in order to ensure that black voters are excluded.

There are others. Voter identification laws, on the books in 36 states, disproportionately affect people of colour and the poor. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, 25% of African Americans of voting age lack government-issued photo ID, compared to just 8% of whites.

A whole thicket of other barriers set up to limit participation was the explicit target of a 1965 voting rights act, the landmark Civil Rights Law that aimed to end racial discrimination in voting and fully realise the post-Civil War 14th and 15th Amendments to the US constitution. Conservatives have long chafed at the law, which contained crucial provisions to increase scrutiny of states and counties with an especially egregious record of suppressing black votes. In 2013, a Supreme Court that was already leaning right struck down that part of the act, depriving advocates of crucial tools for fighting voter suppression.

There are softer measures too. Elections take place on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November, and voting day is not a public holiday. For many, that can mean choosing between voting and wages, or even keeping your job.

For those who make it through the doors of a polling place, the design of the senate, and above all the electoral college system, conspire to devalue votes from America’s diverse cities and coasts, and to elevate those of whiter and more rural parts of the country.

Seen through that lens, turnout looks very different. And so does Donald Trump’s relentless attack on the integrity of the electoral system, which is being abetted by local officials and, in some cases, courts, even as polls overwhelmingly predict a Biden victory.

Black Americans have always known the system was rigged against them. For whites, it was easy not to know, or simply not to care very much. Trump may have changed that for good by seeking to keep it that way.

Americans are voting right now as if their lives depended on it. And their democracy. By Wednesday, 70 million had cast ballots, more than half the total turnout in 2016. Some of that is down to the need to limit exposure to Covid-19 as cases surge to new highs in some of the most contested parts of the country. Some of it is down to passionate commitment to Trumpism, too. But much of it is driven by a realisation, now dawning much more widely, of how lopsided the system is, how captured by local partisans, how vulnerable, how mired in the legacy of racism.

To line up in the rain to vote in safely blue Brooklyn, or to risk infection in a swing state, is both to assert and to celebrate the unrealised idea of a full American democracy even as the president and his party strain every sinew to curtail it.

We had three days to vote in South Africa in 1994, and by the third it would be the work of five or ten minutes, but we went to queue on the first, not only because we had waited too long for democracy, but because we wanted to participate in this great national ceremony of liberation and of binding to a constitutional order.

And so I know how my US neighbours feel, in this very different moment of theirs. I hope with all my heart they get it right. DM

Nic Dawes is the former Editor of the Mail & Guardian. He now lives in New York where he was until recently Deputy Executive Director of Human Rights Watch.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Sam van Coller says:

    Having a revered Constitution is no guarantee of democracy. Without an independent judiciary and accountability, they are more than likely to fail to do their job

  • Kanu Sukha says:

    In Trump, Americans have found their Eugene Terblanche ! If ever there was a white supremacist (ask Scramuchi his one-time spokesman) he is it’s flagrant and proud embodiment . That the Republicans, including the only black senator in their ranks, who defends his blatant racism (ask Ryan who left the party) continue to aid and abet this disgraceful fascist, will remain a mystery to me. I guess ‘slavery’ is a mindset he does not fully understand – deferring to his white ‘master’ Trump. He does not realise that the once civil party he joined some time ago, has been taken over and subjugated to the ego, racism and fascism of Trump the Apprentice. He still thinks he is on that show, demanding that the ‘results’ be ‘announced’ on the day, instead of waiting for the official declaration !

  • Lucius Casca says:

    The level of deranged hyperbole in this article is incredible… “Democracy is on the line”, really?? What democratic rights will be taken away or infringed upon if Trump wins?
    Voter ID is not vote suppression, it’s common sense, it’s even a requirement in SA. As for convicted felons have to settle their debt to society before being able to participate in its rights and privileges? Wow, what a shocking intolerant notion..
    Throwing the race and bigot card is old dude, didn’t work in 2016 and it’s jot going to work now. Black and Latino communities are realizing that their longstanding Democrat-run inner cities are a disaster and they will vote accordingly.

  • Glyn Morgan says:

    So the present system of US democracy needs corrections. Yes it does from my view here in SA. (One query – Why don’t these non-identifiable people just register? It is up to them surely? “According to the American Civil Liberties Union, 25% of African Americans of voting age lack government-issued photo ID, compared to just 8% of whites.”) I trust that the new system (if and when it comes into being) is a real free, equal and liberal democratic system and not skewed in some way.

  • Richard Breytenbach says:

    Here’s a fun fact – the Trump administration passed MORE legislation in support of improving the lives of people of colour in 1 term than the Obama administration did in 2 terms. This is never acknowledged by any ‘leftie’ – it doesn’t gel with the public (popular) narrative. Insofar as the melodramatic nonsense about ‘democracy being on the line’, it isn’t – at least, not in the USA. Nic should rather spend more time studying American history offline than following the frantic Democratic online chatter. Now in South Africa, on the other hand, we really do have a de-facto one-party state with true democracy and an open free market merely a rapidly fading dream.

  • Gerry Talbot says:

    I assume that Nic thinks Trump will destroy democracy based on his beyond obvious bias. What is so ‘democratic’ about the only sane choice being one particular (Democrat) party…like there is only one choice and if you don’t make that choice that’s the end of democracy. If there is only one choice there’s no need for an election. What is clear to me is that half the country has been blinded to the facts and amazingly come up with an array of issues to blame Trump on – Voter ID (if they did not require identification, how do you suppose the system can make sure no one votes more than once and is even eligible to vote); the electoral college (which has been part of the US political system for eons if it was so awful to the democrats, why have they not done something about it in the numerous times they’ve been in power [Obama?, Clinton? etc]); the virus. Nic, the journalist, has nothing critical to say about the democrats and feels the system is lopsided. If the other party is so racist why are they receiving increasing support from Latino’s and Blacks? If commentators on the left have a hard time understanding this, then maybe they should check their level of partisanship and blindness to their own sense of righteousness. The road to hell is paved with good intentions (i.e. the downfall of democracy). Presidents come and go. I would have thought that in 4 years the DP could have come up with a better plan than Biden who is not up to the task, regardless of what the polls and pundits say. Hillary was not that popular and Biden is luke warm. Its possible that those pollsters may be coming up to a deja vu moment. Righteousness and wishful thinking are correlated here.

  • Martin Engelbrecht says:

    According to the writer it’s the end of civilization for me it’s the celebration of having Trump in the white house for another four years and the end of the democratic party in USA. The media are going to get the biggest hiding this election. Hunter Biden trailing his father getting business deals. Biden is too old to do the job. He forgets and makes basic errors.

  • Geoff Krige says:

    Democracy functions on how votes are allowed and how they are added into electing representatives. In South Africa the Nationalist Party came to power in 1948 on the back of a huge majority of votes cast going to the United Party (The United Party and its allies – 50.9% to National Party and its allies – 41.2%) but because most rural (predominantly National Party supporting) constituencies were much smaller than urban (predominantly United Party supporting) constituencies the National Party won more constituencies and thus the election. Same story with the electoral college system in USA. And Trump with Republican lawmakers is actively and aggressively opposing any move to reduce this bias (such as allowing postal votes). Is this true democracy? In South Africa now votes go to a party, which then appoints representatives based purely on number of votes received nationally (or regionally), which denies voters a sense of being properly represented. Is this true democracy? True democracy depends on every citizen being allowed and enabled to elect representatives to express their wishes in based on an accurate, true and accountable presentation of the facts. This is what places democracy in USA (and most other democratic countries) under massive threat today. When the President of USA is a serial liar and partisan bully unable to rationally debate issues, when Russia or China can swing elections in USA by means of social media, then democracy is under threat.

  • Bee Man says:

    What a crock article. Left me stone cold and did not provide the content the headline promised…
    Democracy under threat, but only if the current situation doesn’t suit your agenda I suppose.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz