X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

The Emergency Budget: If government doesn’t listen, t...

Business Maverick

BUSINESS MAVERICK OP-ED

The Emergency Budget: If government doesn’t listen, the cliff is closer than you think

Good fiscal policy is more meaningfully about ensuring we progressively realise socioeconomic rights, especially among the marginalised, says the writer. (Image: Adobestock)

Covid-19 has only exacerbated South Africa’s economic problems, not to mention the toll on human lives. Perhaps the one upside here is that we’re more aware of how dangerous our situation is. And let us not pretend: We really are that close to the cliff.

In February 2020, before Covid-19 was declared a pandemic, before the latest downgrade by Moody’s and before the start of the economic fallout from the national lockdown, I stressed the urgency of producing a Budget that reduced South Africa’s debt, placed the right people in the right public roles, and widened the tax net rather than simply punishing individuals and businesses who are already tax compliant.

Let me say it again. Good fiscal policy isn’t just about balancing costs and expenses. It’s more meaningfully about ensuring we progressively realise socio-economic rights, especially among the marginalised.

You can’t sustain educational, social or healthcare reform if you don’t collect enough money, allocate it correctly, and ensure the right people are accountable for it. But too much of our policy never becomes practice. When that happens, when we aren’t alive to the urgency of reform, we risk committing human rights abuses against our own citizens either through deliberate (in)action or quite simply through the neglect caused by the failure to ensure clear policy is actually acted upon by those with the competence to do it right.

Sadly, if these issues were urgent in February, they are mission-critical in June. Everyone should take caution: South Africa is on a ledge and about to fall off unless we take drastic and immediate action. Covid-19, for all its devastations on lives and livelihoods, may just be the linchpin that makes us see our precarious position for what it is.

Have we become too accustomed to living on the l(edge)? 

Maybe. In February, Government debt was at an already unsustainable 70% of GDP and rising, with a dismal economic growth of 0.2% and a projected budget deficit for the 2020/21 fiscal year of 78% over 5 years.

Think of it this way, our youth leaving school each year joining the job market requires the economy to grow and add at least 600 000 jobs. Then Covid-19 happened. And SAA. And the Land Bank. The unions are also still at odds with the government about pay increases at a time when the public wage bill isn’t translating into enough growth and infrastructure improvement.

Everyone is asking for money, but no one knows where it will come from. When Tito Mboweni briefed the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac) last week, he called for an intervention to avoid a national debt crisis in an environment where government spending has now overtaken investment as a share of GDP. We are fast approaching a debt to GDP ratio of up to 85% over the short term if we don’t do something now to our policy. Economists are already predicting a budget deficit of at least 14%, which is more than double the February figure.

Increasing the revenue line

So, where will the money come from? The New Development Bank (NDB) just approved a $1-billion emergency Covid-19 loan for South Africa (around R17.4-billion). And the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is busy deciding whether we can draw on a $4.2 billion (R73-billion) loan.

We have also applied to the World Bank for a $50-million (R869-million) loan. The problem? These are all loans, not collections, and they only make our debt noose tighter. Coupled with the crippling inaction to address the policy and structural changes we are effectively borrowing more to sustain the broken lifestyle of South Africans and to maintain fruitless state infrastructure and expenses, it’s the national equivalent of a poorly run household using a limited overdraft and then expecting help from neighbours, but refusing repayment conditions, to pay its bills.

What we must change is our approach. President Ramaphosa speaks to the need for a new approach, but beyond the platitudes, this is where we need clarity. What exactly is this approach? How will it work? When will it be implemented? How will we measure it? Can we answer these questions for the rumoured zero-based budget suggestions?

Mboweni has to present the IMF with a credible fiscal framework before any funds will be released. In a Covid-19 world, where virtually every economy is making sacrifices, no one is giving out money unless there is a concrete attempt to stabilise debt, reduce lending risk.

Our emergency budget speech this week cannot prevaricate, and it cannot be another occasion to say all the right things without detailing credible and practical policy changes that the market can latch onto. We need this. Not only to stabilise our debt, but to reduce the cost of getting into debt when we need it.

Back to the revenue line. The government needs to find a way to fund its extensive stimulus packages and higher healthcare expenses during this pandemic.  The funding gap is made worse by the lost excise duties on alcohol (until level 3 of the lockdown) and tobacco. As business doors close, retrenchments worsen and salaries are cut, personal income tax contributions, our biggest contributor, will drop too. Even as work travel resumes, more employees are now working from home which, from a revenue collection perspective, means a lower consumption all around, for example, fuel levy income.

So, what are some of our options:

  • Increase income tax – As at December 2019, a base 4.9 million were assessed from a registered base of 21 million personal income taxpayers contributing 38.3% to the fiscus. That means that just 8.2% of South Africa’s population are responsible for the biggest single basket of tax revenue collection. We’re also heading towards a deep recession, and retrenchments have already begun. In this environment, increasing the income tax burden is simply not feasible (or even justifiable).
  • Introduce new taxes – There are a few options here. The OECD has been driving a unilateral digital tax mechanism as part of its work against base erosion and profit shifting, or BEPS, for some time. One idea is to tax people where a service is consumed rather than applying it blanketly to everyone. We could also look at a wealth tax on consumers, or a profit levy on larger businesses. But, how do you constrain businesses more in an already constrained environment, where many organisations are just trying not to shed more jobs and to remain a going concern? Also, if these additional tax mechanisms are viable, National Treasury could only meaningfully implement in the medium term, which doesn’t solve our immediate funding crisis.
  • Require services from grant recipients – We have over 18 million people on social grants in South Africa, and the numbers are increasing. Perhaps we should be asking grantees to render some level of service in exchange for state support. At a time of recession and effective austerity, “free” money is not a luxury we can afford.

Then let’s look at the expense line, which is arguably where our most significant change could happen. There are a herd of white elephants that need to be faced head-on.

  • Reduce the number of SOEs – Too many of our SOEs have become an income and debt-funded hole in the fiscus. We should be trying to reduce or drastically reform these non-performing enterprises, not create more as was passed in Parliament a few weeks ago. Our history with SOEs is chequered by putting the wrong people in the wrong decision making jobs. We need more technocrats and less political connections and interference. The recent Constitutional Court ruling that candidates may run for election as individuals may transform this problem, but not in the short term.
  • Reform the tax administration – SARS is adamant that collections for the upcoming tax period is business as usual for people and organisations that aren’t the primary focus of relief measures under the Disaster Management Act. But in reality, the tax base has been decimated by the effects of Covid-19 and it cannot be business as usual. SARS cannot maintain an internally focused view of how, when and through what channel tax is paid. It needs to stay in touch with what’s happening in the economy by driving down the cost of compliance and the cost of doing business, working with entrepreneurs and corporate citizens.

There are other white elephants, to be sure, but they’ve been problematic for so long they’ve become almost common cause: illicit flows of money, corruption and missing funds. There is some encouragement, though: the recent raids on those implicated in the VBS heists shows that the state is starting to hold the accused to account. But our expectation and this climate requires more.

Financial relief costs money. And perhaps the longer view of Covid-19’s effect on our economy is that it wakes us up to some of the systemic (mis)behaviours that have put us in this situation and forces us to find a workable solution at last. BM/DM

Botha is Head of Corporate Tax Consulting at BDO South Africa.

Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted