Maverick Citizen

Blind SA goes to ConCourt in effort to compel the President to sign Copyright Amendment Bill

Blind SA goes to ConCourt in effort to compel the President to sign Copyright Amendment Bill
CHRISTIANA, SOUTH AFRICA – JANUARY 23: Tlhafelo Kwasi a learner at the Christiana School for the Blind and Partially Sighted on January 23, 2013 in South Africa. Established in 2008, the school has managed to get a 100% pass rate for two consecutive years. This is the only school for the visually impaired in the North West. (Photo: Gallo Images / Foto24 / Bongiwe Gumede)

Blind SA has accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of having failed in his constitutional duty, by not signing the long awaited Copyright Amendment Bill into law.

The Copyright Amendment Bill was referred to the President in March 2019 and has been in his in-tray since.

The blind and visually impaired rights body believes the delay perpetuates discrimination against people who live with disabilities because they first have to get copyright permissions in order to convert reading materials into accessible formats, such as Braille.

Blind SA’s views are contained in its founding affidavit of its application to the Constitutional Court.  

CEO of Blind SA, Jace Nair, confirmed the organisation’s constitutional court challenge against Ramaphosa.

“The state attorney received the electronic files of the notice of motion and the founding affidavit and annexures,” Nair explained. “It was also sent to the Constitutional Court.”

Due to lockdown restrictions, the documentation was sent electronically.

Nair also confirmed that the state attorney has given notice of the intention to oppose Blind SA’s application.

Blind SA petitioned the President in February 2020, requesting that he sign the Copyright Amendment Bill to further the rights of all people with disabilities. The affidavit notes that the organisation did not receive a response.

Blind SA’s founding affidavit states, in part:

“The President has failed to fulfil his duty in terms of Section 83(b) of the Constitution to “uphold, defend and respect the Constitution as the supreme law of the Republic”. This duty includes assenting to and signing the Copyright Amendment Bill (“the Bill”), in accordance with Section 79(1) of the Constitution. By failing to sign the Bill (and not having referred it back to the National Assembly on account of any reservations he may have as to its constitutionality), after it has been with him for more than a year, the President is in breach of section 79(1) of the Constitution and not upholding and respecting it.”

According to section 79 of the Constitution, which provides the details for assent, the president is obliged to sign the Copyright Amendment Bill into law within a reasonable period. If there are serious reservations about the constitutionality of the bill, he must refer it back to the National Assembly for reconsideration.

The Copyright Amendment Bill amends the Copyright Act of 1978 which has no provisions for people with disabilities.

Blind SA’s Christo de Klerk explains: “What this has meant for people living with disabilities, such as the blind and visually impaired among others, is that they first have to get the necessary copyright permissions in order for the work that they wanted to read to be transformed into an accessible format such as Braille or another alternative format. The effort in obtaining copyright permissions, even when they are granted, can be time-consuming and daunting for those who lack the means or knowledge to follow the due process involved in obtaining copyright permissions.”

However, the Copyright Amendment Bill has general exceptions for people with disability.

Blind SA explains in its affidavit that the President’s delay in signing the bill compounds the lack of access to reading materials for the blind and visually impaired: “The visually impaired and otherwise print disabled, are prejudiced on an ongoing basis by this delay. They are constantly excluded from everyday reading, from many aspects of study and from numerous cultural aspects. These exclusions prevent them from exercising their constitutional rights to equality and human dignity.” 

Dr Andrew Rens, an expert in South African technology law, says the Copyright Act in its current form is discriminatory.

South Africa cannot have access to hundreds of thousands of books that have already been converted to formats that visually impaired people can use in other countries until it signs the treaty.

“In South Africa, everyone is entitled to receive and impart information. One aspect of this right is the freedom to read. Neither the government nor anyone else is entitled to tell adults what they are allowed to read. But the 1978 Copyright Act prohibits disabled persons from reading texts and receiving information. The state must pass legislation so that the Copyright Act no longer discriminates against blind persons.”

The knock-on effect of the President not signing the Copyright Amendment Bill, detailed in Blind SA’s affidavit, is that it delays the ratification of the Marrakesh treaty.

The United Nations-administered Marrakesh treaty was adopted in 2013 and allows organisations that serve the visually impaired to share copies of accessible materials made under exceptions in a signatory country with organisations that serve the visually impaired in another signatory country. South Africa cannot have access to hundreds of thousands of books that have already been converted to formats that visually impaired people can use in other countries until it signs the treaty.

Blind SA’s affidavit explains that “the consensus view of the Departments of Trade and Industry, Justice and Constitutional Development and International Relations and Cooperation is that the Marrakesh Treaty can be ratified provided that the Bill is passed with provisions giving effect to the provisions of the Marrakesh Treaty.”

Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the University of Cape Town, Caroline Ncube, explains the significance of the Marrakesh Treaty: “A decision has been made to sign on to the Marrakesh Treaty but only after the enactment of the Copyright Amendment Bill (CAB). Therefore, as long as the CAB has not received presidential assent, the Marrakesh Treaty lies in limbo for South Africans. This is a travesty, particularly during a national disaster, in which the blind and visually impaired continue to have limited access to materials that provide important health information, which in this context may literally be life-saving. It is essential that these materials be made available in accessible formats, which would be enabled and supported by the provisions in the CAB.” 

The blind and visually impaired are a very vulnerable sector of society in that impediments to their access to copyright-protected works “hinder(s) their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others (Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), preamble). South Africa ratified the CRPD in 2007 and is obliged to respect, protect and promote the rights of persons with disabilities. Further, section 9 prohibits unfair discrimination against persons on various grounds, including disability.”

Professor Sean Flynn, Associate Director, Programme on Information Justice and Intellectual Property at the American University Washington College of Law provided this view: “The Copyright Amendment Bill implements the World Intellectual Property Organisation Marrakesh Treaty for the Blind and Visually Impaired – the first human rights-based international copyright treaty. The South African Bill has been praised by human rights and disability advocates for going beyond the Marrakesh Treaty and providing for the rights of the hearing impaired and people with other disabilities that may require accessible formats of copyrighted works. South Africa’s Constitution is world-renowned for its explicit inclusion of disability rights into the equality clause. Article 9 of the Constitution requires the government to “promote the achievement of equality” and “may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including … disability”. DM/MC

Linda Daniels is a Bertha Scholar and a Research Fellow with ReCreate SA.


"Information pertaining to Covid-19, vaccines, how to control the spread of the virus and potential treatments is ever-changing. Under the South African Disaster Management Act Regulation 11(5)(c) it is prohibited to publish information through any medium with the intention to deceive people on government measures to address COVID-19. We are therefore disabling the comment section on this article in order to protect both the commenting member and ourselves from potential liability. Should you have additional information that you think we should know, please email [email protected]"

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.8% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.2% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.2% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.2%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options