Yes, South Africa spends as much on VIP protection & security as on land reform

By Africa Check 10 May 2018

Photo of Jacob Zuma's security detail by Greg Nicolson.

The Democratic Alliance’s policy head claimed that the government budgets about the same for VIP protection and security as it does for land reform. Is this correct? Researched by GOPOLANG MAKOU.

This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website

Compensation for land has “never in fact been prioritised in national budgets previously”, Gwen Ngwenya, the head of policy for the Democratic Alliance, said recently.

Ngwenya was speaking at a policy debate on land expropriation without compensation at the University of South Africa, where she pushed back on the argument that compensation would be a financial burden on the state.

She referred to a recent report by the Institute of Race Relations which, she said, showed that the government spent around R2.6-billion on VIP protection and security services.

That’s an amount that almost mirrors the amount that is currently allocated towards land reform,” Ngwenya said.

A reader brought this claim to our attention, so we checked the data.

How much has been set aside for land reform?

At the end of the current financial year, according to the 2018/2019 national budget, expenditure on VIP Protection… will amount to R2.6-billion,” the think-tank noted in its report, published in March 2018.

The report defined VIP protection as “VIP Protection Services, Presidential Protection Services, Static and Mobile Security and the 21 (VIP) Squadron”.

The total allocated to the department of rural development and land reform in the 2018/2019 financial year is R10.4-billion, according to budget data from the national treasury.

The amount is spread across the department’s programmes, which include administration, rural development and restitution. The land reform programme has been allocated R2.7 billion.

Department of rural development and land reform budget (2018/19)




R1.8 billion

National geomatics management services

R690 million

Rural development

R1.8 billion


R3.4 billion

Land reform

R2.7 billion


R10.4 billion

Source: National Treasury

What does the land reform budget cover?

Ruth Hall, a professor at the University of the Western Capes Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies explained to Africa Check what the land reform budget line covers.

The land reform budget funds government’s acquisition of land and redistribution of land, as well as efforts to secure people’s rights to land,” she said.

How much is set aside for VIP protection and other security?

The South African Police Service (SAPS) has been allocated R91.8-billion for the 2018/2019 financial year. Of this, R2.9-billion has been earmarked for the protection and security services programme.

According to the treasury, this programme is tasked with protecting local and foreign dignitaries. It also evaluates security for national key points and some strategic installations.

The programme’s VIP protection services has been allocated R1.5-billion.

South African police budget (2018/2019)




R19.4 billion

Visible policing

R46.9 billion

Detective services

R18.8 billion

Crime intelligence

R3.8 billion

Protection and security services

R2.9 billion

Total expenditure estimates

R91.8 billion

Source: National Treasury

Figures from the 2018/2019 budget allocations on land reform (R2.7-billion) and protection and security services (R2.9-billion) support Ngwenya’s claim.

Land reform includes restitution

But more context is needed. While the land reform line item is R2.7-billion, land restitution is an additional R3.4-billion.

Government’s commitment to land reform includes restitution,” Hall said.

So while Ngwenya’s claim for spending on land reform is technically correct, it does exclude the amount allocated to restitution.

The restitution budget funds primarily two things. It funds the acquisition of land and residential property to restore it to people who were dispossessed (of it) in the past,” she said.

But it also funds cash compensation to land claimants. And we know that the majority of claims have been settled with cash compensation to date.”

Hall added that the restitution budget also funded the commission on restitution of land rights, responsible for investigating and processing restitution claims.

Hall highlighted that the land reform budget had indeed been reduced in recent years. “Between 2007/8 and 2014/15 the land reform budget has fallen by 32%,” she said.

In 2007 to 2008 the budget allocation to land reform was at 0.9% of the national budget. It’s never been above 1%. By 2014/15 it had dropped to 0.5% of the national budget.”

Conclusion: Government 2018/2019 spending on land reform nearly as much as on VIPs and protection

At a debate on land expropriation without compensation, the Democratic Alliance’s head of policy, Gwen Ngwenya, said the South African government has not prioritised compensation in recent budgets.

To illustrate this, she said the government’s current land reform budget mirrored that of its spend on VIP and protection services.

In its 2018/2019 financial year, the national treasury has set aside R2.7-billion for land reform and R2.9-billion for protection and security services.

While this supports Ngwenya’s claim, she may have overlooked that restitution is also part of the government’s land reform effort. DM


Watch Pauli van Wyk’s Cat Play The Piano Here!

No, not really. But now that we have your attention, we wanted to tell you a little bit about what happened at SARS.

Tom Moyane and his cronies bequeathed South Africa with a R48-billion tax shortfall, as of February 2018. It's the only thing that grew under Moyane's tenure... the year before, the hole had been R30.7-billion. And to fund those shortfalls, you know who has to cough up? You - the South African taxpayer.

It was the sterling work of a team of investigative journalists, Scorpio’s Pauli van Wyk and Marianne Thamm along with our great friends at amaBhungane, that caused the SARS capturers to be finally flushed out of the system. Moyane, Makwakwa… the lot of them... gone.

But our job is not yet done. We need more readers to become Maverick Insiders, the friends who will help ensure that many more investigations will come. Contributions go directly towards growing our editorial team and ensuring that Daily Maverick and Scorpio have a sustainable future. We can’t rely on advertising and don't want to restrict access to only those who can afford a paywall subscription. Membership is about more than just contributing financially – it is about how we Defend Truth, together.

So, if you feel so inclined, and would like a way to support the cause, please join our community of Maverick Insiders.... you could view it as the opposite of a sin tax. And if you are already Maverick Insider, tell your mother, call a friend, whisper to your loved one, shout at your boss, write to a stranger, announce it on your social network. The battle for the future of South Africa is on, and you can be part of it.


Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Writing the 2019 Election

The Young Guns and reruns of Little House on the Prairie

By Ismail Lagardien

Sushi is traditionally eaten by hand and not with chopsticks.