First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Mogoeng says he's neither inexperienced nor ethically i...

Defend Truth


Mogoeng says he’s neither inexperienced nor ethically impaired

New Constitutional Court judge Mogoeng Mogoeng hadn't even tried out his chair before he came under attack – from us, among other quarters. He's got something to say about that.

Mogoeng is clearly irritated at claims he’s inexperienced, and doesn’t have the highest sense of ethics. On the weekend both the Democratic Alliance and the Inkhata Freedom Party said, on the record, they felt he didn’t have the necessary constitutional law experience. There was also a claim he didn’t recuse himself from a Truth Commission case in which his wife was a prosecutor.

Well, once given an opportunity to set the record straight, he ran with it. He explained it was not a TRC case (we got it wrong too – sorry Judge, please don’t hold it against us should we ever appear before you), but rather an appeal case he oversaw. His wife did appear as a prosecutor, but there was no request for him to recuse himself. He also pointed out that he wasn’t sitting alone, as it was an appeal, and so he wasn’t the only judge hearing the case.

As far as the experience charge goes, he pointed to several cases he’d heard that had constitutional implications. He explained how he’d told all of this to the Judicial Service Commission (he’s right, we were there) and they’d clearly accepted that.

What surprised us was how quickly he responded to the request for an interview.  Once we were able to get through to him, he accepted our request with alacrity.

The other new Constitutional Court judges weren’t nearly so easy. Judge Sisi Khampepe is sitting at the Labour Court this week, and her assistant said that he just couldn’t get through to her. Judge Chris Jafta is at the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein, which is in recess. So if you don’t have his cell phone number, there’s no interconnection with him. And Judge Johan Froneman’s assistant said simply: “the judge says no”. His judgments are likely to be short.

But Mogoeng was always the most likely to speak in public. His performance at the JSC resembled that of a Baptist preacher; there’s a bit of Martin Luther King Jnr about him, the same cadence and flowing manner of speech, with a bit of a dream thrown in.

We’re going to miss Albie Sachs as he goes off to into the sunset to design buildings, write books and bring up his youngest son. Mogoeng doesn’t have quite the same backstory, but he might bring the same heart to the court.

Stephen Grootes
(Grootes is an Eye Witness News reporter)


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted