AU report into sexual violence in South Sudan: Vital to stop women’s bodies being used in war
- Navi Pillay
- 16 Jan 2015 (South Africa)
Then, I was made hopeful by discussions with South Sudan’s leaders on discrimination and violence against women. The president and senior officials seemed committed to supporting girls’ empowerment and education, and accepted that the rule of law, based on a good human rights system, as being fundamental to a properly functioning democracy.
I returned to South Sudan in April 2014, four months after tensions within the county’s ruling party, the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM), boiled over into armed conflict in the capital, Juba. Violence spread rapidly among security forces, with civilians targeted based on their ethnicity or assumed political affiliation. Armed thugs roamed the countryside raping women and children, and taking them as sex slaves. My hopes were shattered.
The ruthlessness of sexual violence in South Sudan brings back memories of Rwanda. In 1998, while serving as a judge on the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, my colleagues and I heard horrendous stories of mass rapes and other sexual crimes. I was moved by the testimony of victims who said that rape destroyed their physical and psychological health as well as life itself.
In our judgment in the case of The Prosecutor vs. Jean Paul Akayesu, we held that sexual violence in war could constitute genocide and crimes against humanity, as well as torture. We found that sexual violence was used as an instrument of war aimed at the systematic destruction of Tutsi women and the Tutsi group as a whole.
While South Sudan is not experiencing genocide, the levels of sexual violence are no less shocking. Zainab Bangura, the UN’s envoy for sexual violence in conflict, recently said she has not witnessed a situation worse than South Sudan in her 30 years’ experience. She can draw comparisons with Liberia, Somalia, Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Central African Republic and Bosnia, where women’s bodies were weapons in the frontlines of conflict.
One of the main reasons we are seeing such extreme sexual violence in South Sudan is the country’s pervasive culture of impunity. The perpetrators – including members of the police, army and armed militias – know that there is no rigorous justice system and almost no risk of consequences. Unless this changes, the frequency and brutality of sexual violence will rise, as one cycle of violence fuels the next.
For those seeking justice, accountability and an end to the country’s longstanding culture of impunity, the African Union's commission of inquiry on South Sudan is a beacon of light.
Under the leadership of former Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo, the commission’s final report is expected to be a damning document that details countless human rights violations and even lists names of those recommended for trial. This is what the beginnings of accountability should look like.
Madame Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, the chairperson of the African Union Commission, is to be commended for her leadership in forming the first-ever African Union investigation of mass human rights violations on our continent. Now she faces an even bigger challenge to see life breathed into the commission’s recommendations.
It is critical that the African Union Peace and Security Council make Obasanjo’s report public and act upon its recommendation to establish a credible accountability mechanism for South Sudan. If the report is buried or watered down, the hope created by the appointment of the commission will die, and impunity will continue to reign.
We need accountability and justice to stem the tide of human rights abuses spreading across much of South Sudan. The threat of criminal prosecution can act as a powerful deterrent and may even help convince the warring parties they have more gain by laying down their guns and committing to the (more difficult) task of making peace and rebuilding their country.
There have been tremendous advances in tackling impunity for serious crimes over the past 20 years, in particular through the ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia and the International Criminal Court (ICC).
While international and national accountability processes have contributed immensely to challenging impunity for violations of international law, such efforts on their own cannot stop the cycle completely. Political will on the part of governments is essential, and usually constitutes the biggest obstacle.
If the government of South Sudan is not willing or able to put a stop to this insidious form of violence that targets women and girls, the international community has a responsibility to step in.
As African heads of state and AU officials convene in Addis Ababa for the 24th AU Summit this month, they must do all they can to ensure that the report from Obasanjo’s commission of inquiry represents the beginning of the end of impunity in South Sudan. DM
Navanethem (Navi) Pillay was the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights from September 2008 to September 2014.
Reader notice: Our comments service provider, Civil Comments, has stopped operating and will terminate services on 20th Dec 2017. As a result, we will be searching for another platform for our readers. We aim to have this done with the launch of our new site in early 2018 and apologise for the inconvenience.