First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

Giuliani’s Law License Suspended by N.Y. Over Electio...



Giuliani’s Law License Suspended by N.Y. Over Election Lies

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 30: Rudy Giuliani, former New York City mayor and current lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks to members of the media during a White House Sports and Fitness Day at the South Lawn of the White House May 30, 2018 in Washington, DC. President Trump hosted the event to encourage children to participate in sports and make youth sports more accessible to economically disadvantaged students. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
By Bloomberg
24 Jun 2021 0

(Bloomberg) --Rudy Giuliani was suspended from practicing law in New York by a state court that said he put the public at risk by spreading lies about the 2020 presidential election.

By Chris Dolmetsch and Greg Farrell
Jun 24, 2021, 5:34 PM – Updated on Jun 24, 2021, 7:33 PM
Word Count: 952
The false statements were made to bolster the “narrative that due to widespread voter fraud, victory in the 2020 United States presidential election was stolen from his client,” then-President Donald Trump, the Manhattan-based appeals court said in an order Thursday.

President Trump Hosts White House Sports And Fitness Day
Rudy Giuliani
It’s the latest blow to the 77-year-old former New York mayor, who was admitted to the bar in 1969 and once stood atop the Manhattan legal community as chief federal prosecutor and as a partner at several large law firms. His home and office were raided by the FBI in April as part of a federal criminal investigation.

Giuliani’s “conduct immediately threatens the public interest and warrants interim suspension from the practice of law,” the Appellate Division, First Department, said in its 33-page ruling. “This country is being torn apart by continued attacks on the legitimacy of the 2020 election and of our current president, Joseph R. Biden.”

Read More: Giuliani’s Election Conspiracy Theory Faces Crucial Court Test

Giuliani had faced several calls for disbarment following his election-fraud claims and the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Though suspension is short of disbarment, the court said disciplinary proceedings were ongoing.

John M. Leventhal and Barry Kamins, Giuliani’s lawyers, said they believed he would be cleared once a hearing was held.

“This is unprecedented as we believe that our client does not pose a present danger to the public interest,” the lawyers, both former New York state judges, said in a statement. “We believe that once the issues are fully explored at a hearing Mr. Giuliani will be reinstated as a valued member of the legal profession that he has served so well in his many capacities for so many years.”

The suspension comes at a time when Giuliani is being investigated by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which he led in the 1980s, for possibly illegally lobbying the Trump administration on behalf of Ukrainian interests who sought the ouster of then-U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents conducted April 28 raids on his home and office pursuant to warrants from that probe, seizing his personal electronic devices.

Giuliani, who openly sought information in Ukraine that could damage Biden in the run-up to the 2020 election, has denied acting for anyone in that county, saying he was only representing Trump as a lawyer.

The appeals court that suspended Giuliani rejected his argument that his statements were merely opinions and the disciplinary action violated his free-speech rights. The panel cited false statements of the fact made by Giuliani, including his claim that Pennsylvania processed more absentee ballots for the election than it sent out.

‘Uncontroverted Misconduct’
“This factual statement regarding the number of ballots mailed out before the election was simply untrue,” the panel said. “The true facts are that 3.08 million absentee ballots were mailed out before the general election, which more than accounted for the over 2.5 million mail-in ballots that were actually tallied.”

Giuliani “repeatedly advanced false statements that there were 600,000 to 700,000 fabricated mail-in ballots, which were never sent to voters in advance of the election,” the court said.

“The seriousness of respondent’s uncontroverted misconduct cannot be overstated,” the panel wrote. “False statements intended to foment a loss of confidence in our elections and resulting loss of confidence in government generally damage the proper functioning of a free society. When those false statements are made by an attorney, it also erodes the public’s confidence in the integrity of attorneys.”

The court said the suspension will remain in place until disciplinary matters have been concluded and another issue is ordered. As part of the suspension, Giuliani is not only prevented from appearing in a court as an attorney, he also can’t give anyone “an opinion as to the law or its application.”

Read More: Giuliani FBI Search Turns Table on 1980s Wall Street Top Cop

The suspension is a striking development for a lawyer of Giuliani’s prominence. Before he was elected mayor in 1993, Giuliani was famous as the hard-charging Manhattan U.S. attorney who prosecuted 1980s insider traders like Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken and went after the heads of all five New York Mafia families in the famous “Commission Trial.” He had been U.S. associate attorney general, the number-three figure in the Justice Department, before that.

His leadership of the city during the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks made him “America’s Mayor” and made him hot commodity in the legal profession. In 2005, he made a lucrative deal with the Texas law firm Bracewell, which adopted the name Bracewell & Giuliani until he left in 2016.

Giuliani’s growing association with Trump estranged him further from the legal community though. He resigned from his last major firm, Greenberg Traurig, in 2018 to focus on his work for Trump during the investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

He made his first courtroom appearance in decades on Trump’s behalf, pushing voter-fraud claims to try to convince a federal judge in Pennsylvania to set aside the state’s election results in favor of Biden. U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann subsequently issued one of the most stinging rebukes to the Trump team’s claims.

“This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence,” Brann wrote. “In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more.”

(Updates with statement by Giuliani’s lawyers, background)
–With assistance from Erik Larson.


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

No Comments, yet

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted