First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Tintin in the Congo does not break racism laws, court f...



Tintin in the Congo does not break racism laws, court finds

No matter who the boy adventurer Tintin took on in any of his 24 escapades, he always ended up on top. This week he prevailed again: this time in a Belgian court. By REBECCA DAVIS.

Congolese campaigner Bienvenu Mbutu Mondondo had spent the past five years trying to persuade the Belgian courts to ban 1946’s Tintin in the Congo on the grounds of racism. The book was the second in the Tintin series by Belgian artist Hergé, and was originally serialised in 1931 before being issued in book form in 1946. The Congo depicted by Hergé was one that existed in the artist’s imagination only. He had never left Belgium when he created the narrative that saw his fictional journalist encounter diamond smugglers and big game hunters. And, of course, black people. Black people described by the UK’s Commission for Racial Equality as “look[ing] like monkeys and talk[ing] like imbeciles”.

In 2011, following the release of Steven Spielberg’s film The Adventures of Tintin, it emerged that copies of the comic book were being sold in a sealed wrapper out of awareness for their controversial contents. Publishers also printed a caveat in the books, saying that Hergé “depicted the African people according to the bourgeois, paternalistic stereotypes of the period”.

But on Monday a Belgian court found this insufficient to ban the book, deciding that the book reflected the (European) attitudes of the time and thus did not contravene existing anti-racism laws. “It is clear that neither the story, nor the fact that it has been put on sale, has a goal to… create an intimidating, hostile, degrading or humiliating environment,” said the judgment. Mondondo has indicated he will appeal. DM

Read more:

  • Hergé’s ‘racist’ adventures of Tintin? Not so, court decides, in The Independent.

Photo: Tintin in the Congo has not been found to be racist and will not be banned. (Original cover)


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted