First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Libya's nonexistent disarmament plans



Libya’s nonexistent disarmament plans

Libya’s awash with weapons, most unaccounted for, and no one can agree on what to do about them. The fighters themselves don’t seem too keen to hand them over – a gun being the best insurance against marginalisation. By SIMON ALLISON.

The average Libyan fighter, one of the revolutionary army that toppled Gaddafi, used to be something else entirely. Maybe a baker, an engineer, maybe unemployed. Then came the revolution, and suddenly he picked up an AK-47 for the first time. Or welded an anti-aircraft gun onto the back of a Toyota Landcruiser, which was the nearest thing the rebels had to a tank. Or he strapped a rocket-propelled grenade onto his back and pointed it in the vague direction of the enemy.

But now the revolution is over, and the former baker/engineer/jobseeker is supposed to return, somehow, to his old life. But what does he do with his AK-47? Where does he park his militarised Landcruiser?

The solution to this problem is one of the greatest threats facing Libya’s new government. And so far, there’s not a lot of direction or agreement on the issue. The National Transitional Council, supposedly in charge, has made vague mutterings about collecting and registering all the weapons. But this isn’t a viewpoint shared by all the heads of the loose coalition of individual revolutionary councils that give the NTC its authority. They are worried about maintaining their own power in the new Libya.

Abdujawad Bedeen, spokesman for the 25,000-man Union of Revolutionary Forces, told Reuters it was vital for fighters to keep their weapons because if the remnants of pro-Gaddafi support were to rise up, the new government would not be able to contain them. This is disingenuous, for the Gaddafi threat has gone. But Libya’s fighters worry about being left out of the new political dispensation, and retaining their arms is insurance against this.

But inevitably, as Libya constructs a new state, some will be sidelined. Some will get impatient. And the fact that these people will be armed and battle-hardened does not bode well for Libya’s immediate future. DM



Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted