First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Groupon acquisition reveals Google's new strategy: buy,...

Sci-tech

Sci-Tech

Groupon acquisition reveals Google’s new strategy: buy, don’t invent

Some analysts couldn’t reach quickly enough to scratch their heads in puzzlement at the news that Google is reportedly about to acquire Groupon for $6 billion, saying that the daily coupon company doesn’t seem worth the money. But Google is looking to diversify its revenue streams, and seems to be adopting Microsoft’s strategy of buying into new ideas, as opposed to developing them internally. By SIPHO HLONGWANE.

It’s all still a rumour, but people close to the situation say that Google is on the cusp of forking out $6 billion for Groupon, a Chicago company that offers daily discounts to shoppers. It will be Google’s largest acquisition ever, dwarfing its $3.1 billion purchase of DoubleClick in 2007.

Groupon offers discounts to a reported 20 million subscribers in 30 markets via email, and takes half the revenue from every deal sold. The business model is so incredibly simple, and so easy to copy, that many analysts say that the company may be overpriced.

“Groupon has cracked the local code, so the real issue is whether this is sustainable,” Colin Gillis of BGC Partners told the Wall Street Journal. “The question here is, who are they bidding against? Is this a pre-emptive move against Facebook, and does this reopen questions that Google is losing the fiscal discipline they [had] a few years ago.

“If you overpay for anything, it will be a controversial buy. Groupon’s business is subject to mimicry,” he said.

Other analysts were more encouraging. The Wall Street Journal quoted Yun Kim of Gleacher & Co as saying that this was more of a strategic move for Google. He said that the company could definitely afford to splash out for Groupon, which may be overpriced for what it does at the moment, but that Google was more likely thinking about what Groupon’s local advertising model could do for it in the future.

The acquisition is Google’s response to the fact that it has been unable to reach small businesses with its current services, including paid search. According to Adage, the revenue for local-search spending will fall from $3.1 billion to $2.8 billion over the next five years, while spending on the email format pioneered by Groupon will double in the same period. The model targets small businesses that can’t afford to invest in Google keyword ads, which the search giant recognises as a vast, untapped market. Coupons work far better (they are more localised than Google ads, for starters) for very small businesses that need to reach local buyers more effectively.

Another important win for Google is that Groupon gives it greater data knowledge – Google will become far more knowledgeable about what sells in certain areas, and how much people are spending. Google’s ace card has always been the vast amount of data that it has on people.

With Google’s financial clout, at times it makes more sense for it to simply buy companies that have developed innovative business models or products as the market changes, instead of trying to out-invent its competition. Google is faced with a similar challenge on another front – the meteoric rise of social networking – a situation to which Microsoft has better responded. Google has made several attempts to enter the social networking space, all of which have failed miserably. Microsoft’s response to social networking was far cleverer – it simply bought into the greatest driver of social networking, Facebook, way back in 2007.

Google may have finally learned its lesson after getting its fingers burned with Google Wave and Buzz – why waste valuable resources trying to outmanoeuvre your competition when you can simply buy them? DM


Read more: Bloomberg News, Wall Street Journal (paywall), Adage
Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted