Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

AGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY

Justice department moves to shield court officials from cameras after Malema’s post-sentencing outburst

Whether his comments and insults were meant as threats or not, judicial authorities are not taking them lightly, and EFF leader Julius Malema’s remarks following his sentencing could have a lasting impact on court proceedings.

Riaan Marais
Riaan - MalemaThreats Leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters Julius Malema in court after he was granted leave to appeal against a five-year prison sentence on 16 April 2026. (Photo: Reuters / Esa Alexander)

Julius Malema’s comments at the expense of court officials involved in his KuGompo firearm case could have far-reaching implications – including how the media covers court proceedings.

After the EFF leader’s insults and comments directed against magistrate Twanet Olivier, the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development seeks to impose a rule that the faces of presiding officers, as well as prosecutors, are not shown during live broadcasts from within a courtroom.

The department has also agreed with the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) that Malema’s perceived threats against court officials be investigated and appropriate action be taken.

The concerns raised by the NPA and the Department of Justice come after Malema took to the stage outside the KuGompo Magistrates’ Court last week to address a crowd of EFF members following his effective five-year sentence for several firearm-related transgressions during the party’s fifth birthday celebrations in Mdantsane in 2018.

His address was broadcast live on the EFF’s X page, while tweets quoting his statements were posted in between.

During his address, he called Olivier “the most incompetent magistrate” as well as “a racist of note”, adding that she had possible ties to AfriForum, which initially laid the charges that led to his conviction and sentencing.

Riaan - MalemaThreats
Magistrate Twanet Olivier presides in EFF leader Julius Malema’s pre-sentencing in the firearms discharge case in KuGompo on 23 January 2026. (Photo: Gallo Images / Randell Roskruge)

Malema further accused the magistrate of applying the law incorrectly, of not reading the evidence before the court and of making rulings based on emotions and politics.

“She goes around fundraising reasons why we must go to prison. We are dealing with someone who does not apply the law [...] Her and reading are not friends. They are not the same WhatsApp group,” Malema continued.

He said he was happy to be done with the proceedings because he no longer wanted to see “her ugly face”.

Department spokesperson Terrence Manase said any conduct that sought to undermine the dignity, independence and safety of judicial officers was a serious concern for the department.

He said the department agreed with the NPA that the reported comments and threats be assessed and investigated to determine the appropriate course of action and ensure that such conduct did not set a precedent.

“In this context, I can confirm that the Minister is writing to the South African National Editors’ Forum (Sanef) and judicial officers to introduce conditions for the broadcasting of court proceedings, including that the faces of judges, magistrates and prosecutors should not be shown.”

Most courts, particularly during regional court proceedings, insist that media organisations bring an application to cover proceedings on a case-by-case basis. These applications are usually done in writing before the start of proceedings, and the presiding officer will give a final ruling on whether proceedings may be recorded or broadcast live.

Judges and magistrates may also impose certain conditions on what may be recorded, for example, whether the presiding officer’s face may be shown during proceedings.

Manase said the department would encourage judges and magistrates to impose stricter conditions when considering applications for media coverage.

The NPA voiced similar concerns for the safety of its officials following Malema’s comments outside the KuGompo courthouse.

State prosecutor, advocate Joel Cesar, was publicly insulted and threatened by EFF leader Julius Malema. (Screengrab: SABC News)

Malema went after state advocate Joel Cesar, saying he was arrogant and suffered from “short man syndrome”. He said Cesar needed to be “taught a lesson” and accused him of undermining court processes, overstepping his authority and perjury.

“And we can only teach him a lesson by sitting on his neck and making sure that he is prosecuted and arrested for lying to court and he is disciplined at work for exercising the powers he does not have,” Malema said.

In a statement, NPA spokesperson Kaizer Kganyago said the EFF’s X platform made statements that “contain serious threats” against Cesar.

“The NPA strongly condemns any form of intimidation or threats against its prosecutors. These officials serve the public by representing the State and are constitutionally mandated to execute their duties without fear, favour or prejudice.”

Kganyago said any threats, whether perceived as credible or not, had to be treated seriously and reported to the relevant law enforcement authorities.

He said that in the Eastern Cape specifically, the safety of prosecutors was a major concern as three prosecutors had been killed in the province in the past two years, two within four months last year.

In April, Ngcobo regional court prosecutor Elona Sombulula was shot and killed near his home in Mtentu.

In August, regional court prosecutor Tracy Brown was murdered while seated in her car, in the driveway of her Young Park home in Nelson Mandela Bay. She worked at the New Brighton Magistrates’ Court.

“The NPA remains resolute in its commitment to safeguarding its prosecutors and ensuring that they can perform their functions independently, safely and effectively. Prosecutors are officers of the court, and a threat to a prosecutor will attract consequences,” Kganyago said.

Malema was released on warning after being granted leave to appeal against his sentence. He has already approached the Makhanda high court to start the process.

While he was not granted leave to appeal against his conviction, he has indicated that he will fight that judgment as well.

Multiple attempts to reach EFF national spokesperson Sinawo Thambo were unsuccessful. DM

Comments

Loading your account…
Peter 22 April 2026 07:04 AM

Such utter disrespect for the law and its officials is insufferable. Incarcerate him for contempt of court and keep him there until he recants

m***0@g***.com 22 April 2026 07:35 AM

Words out of the mouths of aggressive leaders matter. Especially in a tinderbox environment like SA. This issue is serious - and is going to be taken seriously. There is no difference between the obvious threat to the lives of the Court functionaries, and the threat to all farmers and their staff when the "Kill the boer" song is sung with such glee. The permitted allowing of that kind of rhetoric is also serious - and should be stopped too.

JOHN 22 April 2026 08:36 AM

When you allow someone to do and say what he pleases, dont be surprised when he does just that.

Lindy 22 April 2026 08:47 AM

Couldn't agree more - lock him up and let him insult his fellow felons - see how that goes down.

Freda 22 April 2026 09:57 AM

His utterances should be taken seriously and he should be charged with contempt of court. How can a leader spew such utterances. A leader should be setting unapproachable conduct. He is not above the Law,

User 22 April 2026 10:08 AM

These declarations are a serious breach of the pillar of juridical law! It is open defiance of everything that governs the human race. Contempt for court, and these demagogues are openly defecating on sacred ground. Sadly, this treasonous trend appeared to raise its head with Zuma. Unfortunately, it is probably a by-product of the wave of lawlessness unkeased when the ANC took control of the country. Its a lack of respect and discipline for law and order and which will eventually seal our doom

Andrew Blaine 22 April 2026 11:48 AM

When hate speech is alleged to have been used by common citizens they are, generally, subject to immediate arrest and detention. Why does this not apply to those who use a podium to do the same?

Pete.abrahams 22 April 2026 12:02 PM

The courts have allowed JM a free ride with his inflammatory and hatefilled uttering for years. Thin end of the wedge and all that.

Michael Thomlinson 22 April 2026 01:10 PM

What a nasty piece of work. I think he should be charged with contempt of court and should definitely be removed from the judicial commission in parliament.

Confucious Says 22 April 2026 08:49 PM

Agent Woodwork, a rotten apple with a bad attitude!

Johan Retief 23 April 2026 04:23 PM

Yep, give them enough rope and they hang themselves. You can fool the common people for a time, but then it bites you in the back...heh...heh.

Veronica Baxter 24 April 2026 09:12 AM

What I don't understand is why the Daily Maverick chose to publish the photograph of the magistrate and others, when the article points out that this action puts them at risk of abuse?

D'Esprit 26 April 2026 12:10 PM

I wondered exactly the same thing! As for Malema, he has a well-documented history of abusing those that stand in his way, with female journalists and those in authority at particular risk. Perhaps his misogny should be challenged once and for all - ANCWL, anyone? Oh, hang on...

Alan Salmon 24 April 2026 08:55 PM

Unequivocal contempt of court - he should have been jailed immediately. How else do we get the message across that the law must be respected by all citizens unconditionally.

D'Esprit 26 April 2026 03:06 PM

100% I would like someone other than Afriforum to take him on though, maybe Freedom Under Law or someone similar so that the focus is on the facts, and not the politics.

Rae 26 April 2026 10:03 AM

Julius Malema is surfing dangerously close to the attributes usually found in radicals who actively hire hit men to commit the murders of people who stand up to them. Malema is rapidly becoming a danger to our society regardless of race. He must be investigated by the authorities and have action taken to prevent the worst from happening.

Stuart 26 April 2026 04:03 PM

Julius does not have to employ or pay anyone. He is publicly asking his ‘cadres’ to do this for him. This is a crime. Our judicial system has many flaws, of which this is one. It is time for a full review and the balancing of the rights of the ‘criminals’ and those of the generally ‘innocent’ victims. Make innocent until proven guilty more realistic and practical and stop this ‘stalingrade’ nonsense. Make sentences more ‘equal’ to the crime. Imprison important people quickly to make an example.

William Dryden 26 April 2026 10:11 AM

Malema is just arrogant and a wanabee, all he can do to get notices is to make inflammatory remarks that wind up the people, his followers are no better than him.

David Bridgman Bridgman 28 April 2026 05:17 PM

Rather disappointing that DM in an article highlighting real security concerns to prosecution and justice officials, would choose not only to name them, again, but also include screen grabs of their pictures? It might be legal, but is it really ethical, wise or caring?