Defend Truth


‘Grave threat to our democracy’ — Parliament passes controversial electoral legislation

‘Grave threat to our democracy’ — Parliament passes controversial electoral legislation
Political posters in Pretoria for the 2024 elections. (Photo: Gallo Images / Lefty Shivambu)

The National Assembly passed the Electoral Matters Amendment Bill on Tuesday, opening the door to litigation before the crucial general election.

The National Assembly passed the Electoral Matters Amendment Bill during a hybrid plenary on Tuesday.

The Bill seeks to amend the Political Party Funding Act of 2018 and align various pieces of legislation with the Electoral Amendment Act of 2023, which enables independent candidates to contest in elections for seats in the National Assembly and provincial legislatures. It also makes provision for independent candidates to declare their funding sources.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Elections 2024

Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi introduced the Bill in December to regulate the private and public funding of independent candidates and representatives. It will now be sent to the National Council of Provinces for concurrence.

The legislation controversially changes the funding formula of how political parties and independents represented in legislatures receive allocations from state coffers.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Controversial election legislation rushed through Parliament may head to court if proposed 11th-hour talks fail

The Bill proposes a change to the funding formula, which will allocate 90% of funds based on proportional representation and 10% on an equitable basis. The Political Party Funding Act currently allocates 66.6% of funds on proportional representation and 33.3% on an equitable basis, meaning the new law would allocate more funds to the parties with the most seats while small parties’ allocations would decline.

The National Assembly passed the Bill with 240 votes in favour and 90 against. The ANC, EFF and NFP voted in favour, while the DA, IFP, FF Plus, ACDP, UDM, Good party, Cope and PAC voted against it.

Motsoaledi told Parliament on Tuesday, “Most of the amendments are technical in that the words ‘independent’, ‘candidate’ or ‘independent representative’ are inserted in the Act, alongside the words ‘political party’. 

“The original formula that was used when the Political Party Funding Act was passed was done when there were no independent candidates; now that we have independents, we strongly believe that the formula cannot be the same.”  

The parliamentary spokesperson, Moloto Mothapo, said the Bill also made it an offence — punishable by a fine, imprisonment or both — for donations to be made to gain political influence and favour.

“It makes it an offence to donate to a political party, a member of a political party, an independent candidate, or an independent representative in the expectation that the party, member, representative or candidate concerned will influence the awarding of a tender, licence, approval, consent or permission, or the relaxation of a condition or restriction.”

Mothapo said the Bill prevented the Electoral Commission from accepting donations for the Multi-Party Democracy Fund if there was reason to believe they were the proceeds of crime.

“The commission can also suspend the payment of money to a represented political party, independent political party, or independent representative if it is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the represented political party or independent representative has failed to comply with the Act.”

Challenges likely

The Bill is likely to be challenged in court due to what opposition parties say is an attempt by the ANC to increase its share of funds and concerns about how it regulates the disclosure threshold and annual upper limits. Under current laws, parties must disclose donations above R100,000 and cannot accept more than R15-million a year from a single donor.

The portfolio committee rejected a proposal to allow the President to determine the disclosure threshold and upper limits, with critics saying it would give the President too much power.

Under the Bill, the National Assembly will still decide when the President can amend the regulations on the disclosure threshold and upper limits, but according to the non-profit organisation My Vote Counts, it’s created a legal void.

“The adopted version of the Bill repeals the regulations that regulate how these two vitally important limits are determined,” My Vote Counts said. 

“Therefore, there will be a legal void if the [Bill] is signed into law, without a simultaneous proclamation by the President of the disclosure threshold and the upper limit. If this transpires, there will be no disclosure threshold or upper limit in place, completely undermining key objectives of the [Political Party Funding Act].”

The new legislation must be in place before the 29 May elections.

Adrian Roos, a DA MP and Shadow Deputy Minister of Home Affairs, said the Bill was a crude attempt at directing more public and donor funds into the coffers of the ANC to help it try to cling to power.

“The Bill in its current form will change how party funding is allocated and create the possibility of a period of time where there will be no upper limit on party donations, nor threshold for when a party must disclose a donation. These clauses have nothing to do with the inclusion of independent candidates.” 

He added that under the new Bill, an extra R50-million will go to the ANC in the next year alone, while smaller parties’ allocations would be more than halved.

The ANC’s alliance partner Cosatu welcomed the Bill, but said that one critical amendment was needed and should be effected by Parliament.

“Whilst accepting the need for flexibility on caps on donations, the provisions for thresholds below which donations need not be disclosed opens a massive and obvious gap for tenderpreneurs and other persons with criminal intent seeking to buy influence, to legally circumvent the progressive transparency and accountability objectives and provisions of the Act. This is reckless and dangerous.” 

My Vote Counts argued that passing the Bill was consistent with the ANC’s “ongoing campaign to undermine the Political Party Funding Act (PPFA) by expanding its reporting threshold and annual funding limits.

“A year ago, the ANC instructed its MPs to use parliamentary processes to give life to this campaign. It is clear that these amendments in the Electoral Matters Amendment Bill are plainly unconstitutional and a grave threat to our democracy.” DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Iam Fedup says:

    How desperate must you be to resort to such acts of greed? These fools can barely paint lines on roads or keep water flowing, and now they want more. They will never rest until the whole of SA is destroyed, while they enjoy their villas ib Dubai.

  • Paul Alberts says:

    ANC, EFF, NFP this is what awaits us after the elections.

  • BOB Rernard says:

    Here’s an idea for opposition parties, use this bill to demand the anc disclose if they have received monies from Iran, Russia and other despot countries, and how much! Use their legislation against them. Wouldn’t that open a can of worms?!?!

    • Jay Vyas says:

      Also to include those ANC appointed benefactor Tenderpreuners who contribute to the Bankrupted ANC HQ – Luthlooting House and the ANC Opportunist Business Front called Chancellor House!
      ANC, probably the only Governing Party in the world that Leeches off it’s own State Coffers & Taxpayer Funds!
      I Rest My Case!

    • Grant S says:

      It might, but do you really think that opening a can of worms at the overflowing landfill site that is ANC implicated wrongdoing will make one bit of difference? They feel f##k all for anyone but their own selfish endgame.

  • Manie Krause says:

    “It makes it an offence to donate to a political party, a member of a political party, an independent candidate, or an independent representative in the expectation that the party, member, representative or candidate concerned will influence the awarding of a tender, licence, approval, consent or permission, or the relaxation of a condition or restriction.” – Interesting, I thought bribing is already an offence, even for politicians.

  • Rae Earl says:

    “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” Communist dogma in a nutshell as practised by the ANC. What a disgusting bunch of thieving kleptocrats. For SA to have any chance of recovery the MPC and DA coalition is our only hope, their shortcomings (minor), notwithstanding.

  • Theo Voss-Price says:

    I struggle to understand why each seat in parliament doesn’t simply bring an equal amount of funding for campaigns & communications?

  • Hidden Name says:

    Why exactly are political parties funded by tax payers in the first place?

  • Jan Malan says:

    What a joke this will be on the ANC if they drop below 30% of the vote and a new government takes over.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.