Defend Truth


‘A duplicitous game’ – UAE criticised after Guptas extradition request debacle

‘A duplicitous game’ – UAE criticised after Guptas extradition request debacle
Ajay and Atul Gupta at the then New Age newspaper's offices in Midrand, Johannesburg, on 4 March 2011. (Photo: Gallo Images / City Press / Muntu Vilakazi)

Following news of the United Arab Emirates’s rejection of South Africa’s bid to extradite the infamous Gupta brothers, Justice Minister Ronald Lamola said he would engage with UAE authorities to appeal the decision.

‘We still intend to engage our counterparts as requested in March to ensure that the decision of the court is promptly appealed,” Minister of Justice and Correctional Services (DoJ), Ronald Lamola, said on Friday 7 April.

Lamola was updating the media on the Gupta extradition process, confirming that South Africa’s extradition request to have the notorious Gupta brothers, Atul and Rajesh, extradited from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had been dismissed “on a technicality”. 

Read in Daily Maverick: The Guptas are gone. No one is to blame, everyone did their best. The end

The Gupta brothers’ extradition hearing was concluded in Dubai on 13 February 2023, with the court denying South Africa’s request. However, the DoJ was clueless about this until Thursday night, 7 April, after it was finally provided with a note verbale from the UAE.

“We learned with shock and dismay that the extradition hearing had been concluded,” said Lamola.

Atul and Rajesh Gupta – State Capture’s prime suspects – were arrested in Dubai in June 2022. They are wanted by South Africa in connection with fraud and money laundering charges flowing from a Free State government contract commonly known as the Estina dairy scandal. 

Read more in Daily Maverick: Top 10 sites of State Capture: What the Guptas really cost our country

On 24 February, Daily Maverick’s Jessica Bezuidenhout sent the DoJ and Lamola’s office 15 questions relating to the Gupta extradition process, which included whether any representative of the South African government had physically seen a Gupta brother in custody or if they had seen a mugshot of Rajesh or Atul. 

The DoJ never answered, but it appeared officials were searching for answers. 

Read in Daily Maverick: Ten months and counting — no sign of a Gupta, no response from justice department

As it turns out, by the time Daily Maverick’s queries had been sent, the court in Dubai had already concluded the extradition hearing.

According to Lamola, two reasons were given for the Dubai court’s decision: the first was that the charge of money laundering for which South Africa sought the Gupta’s extradition, was also an offence in the UAE and therefore they could be prosecuted in that country. The second reason related to the validity of an arrest warrant submitted as part of South Africa’s extradition request. 

“The reasons provided for denying our request are inexplicable and fly in the face of the assurances given by Emirati authorities that our requests meet their requirements,” said Lamola.

On Friday, DoJ director-general Doctor Mashabane confirmed that the Guptas were no longer in custody in the UAE. It is unclear when exactly the brothers were released.

Officials from the DoJ appeared visibly vexed with UAE authorities’ communication throughout the extradition process. National director of public prosecutions, Shamila Batohi, was resolute that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and the Department of Justice had made every effort to follow all legal processes. 

“South Africa ticked all the boxes and did everything that was required to ensure that our extradition had the best possible opportunities for successful application. There was nothing more that South African authorities could have done,” said Batohi. 

“It does appear clearly that they proceeded with the court case without informing us through the diplomatic channels, which would have been through our embassy,” added Mashabane. He said the South African embassy in Abu Dhabi had received no information about the matter. 

This is at odds with claims made in a statement carried by the state media agency on Friday evening, where the UAE said its judicial authorities had briefed their South African counterparts on proceedings “at every step”.

“Following the decision by the Dubai Court of Appeal, the UAE judiciary underscored that South African authorities are able to resubmit the extradition request with new and additional documentation,” continued the statement.

Lamola said on Friday that the DoJ intends to appeal the decision. But with the whereabouts of the Guptas currently unknown, and with any prospect of an appeal remaining in the hands of the UAE’s justice department, it raises concerns about South Africa’s prospects of ever bringing the Guptas to book.

Read in Daily Maverick: Everyone but the Guptas feels the heat as SA ups the ante on State Capture prosecutions

However, officials from the DoJ and NPA said they would continue to fight to ensure the Guptas face justice. 

“We have to ensure that as a country – irrespective of where they are – we do everything possible to ensure that they are brought back to face justice in South Africa,” said Batohi. “We will leave no stone unturned.”

Extradition processes

“An extradition is both a legal process and a diplomatic/political process. Even if you are successful in the legal process, it will not automatically translate to success in the diplomatic/political process,” said director at the African Centre for Transnational Criminal Justice at the University of the Western Cape, Prof John-Mark Iyi.

“What I find interesting is that the South African authorities claim that the UAE did not inform them about 1) the decision, and 2) that the UAE authorities did not inform them to supply additional information that they were missing,” he said. 

This, he says, would be a breach on the part of the UAE because the treaty requires that they request South Africa to provide additional information if, for example, the information South Africa had provided was inadequate. South Africa should be informed so as to submit additional information before a decision is taken on its extradition request, he said.

“Whether they did inform South African authorities for additional information or whether they did not, I can’t say.”

‘National embarrassment’

The news that the government’s mission to extradite Atul and Rajesh Gupta from the UAE has failed, has been met with mounting public criticism and labelled a major setback for accountability for State Capture crimes. 

DA MP Glynnis Breytenbach described the failed Gupta extradition as a “national embarrassment” which showed that former president Jacob Zuma’s “tentacles are very alive and well in the current Cabinet and government”.

“The question now stands, whether there was ever serious intention to successfully extradite these perpetrators, bearing in mind the consequences that would have ensued for so many highly placed ANC members,” said Breytenbach in a statement on Friday.

“This is a massive failure on the part of both institutions and a serious blow to holding the perpetrators of State Capture accountable.” 

She said the DA would write to the chairperson of Parliament’s Committee on Justice and Correctional Services to request an urgent meeting with the DoJ and NPA. 

ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba said in a statement that his party was of the view that the failed extradition request was an indication South Africa “has lost the respect of the international community”.

“It is extremely concerning that South African diplomats in the UAE – who are paid to advance the country’s interests – failed to duly follow the court proceedings, engage with their UAE counterparts and keep the South African government updated. 

“Both Justice Minister Ronald Lamola and International Relations Minister Naledi Pandor have difficult questions to answer in this regard,” he said. 

Speaking to SABC News on Friday, Congress of the People (Cope) spokesperson Dennis Bloem said President Cyril Ramaphosa and his government were “losing the battle against corruption and State Capture.

“This Gupta extradition saga doesn’t give us hope that those who are responsible for collapsing the economy will ever see the inside of a prison cell. The criminal justice system is really failing this country… Cope is extremely concerned about the state of our criminal justice system.”

Director of the non-profit organisation Open Secrets, Hennie van Vuuren, said he believed it was important to be able to level criticisms at both the UAE and South African governments. 

“I would say it’s very clear that the authorities in Dubai play a very duplicitous game, and the South African authorities would’ve been foolish if they didn’t believe that from the get-go. 

“Dubai is a small criminal enclave… Anyone who believes that you’re going to get a fair trial in the UAE lives in Cloud Cuckooland. And that’s something that the national director of public prosecutions and the minister of justice should’ve been alive to from the get-go,” Van Vuuren told Daily Maverick.    

Van Vuuren described the UAE’s delayed diplomatic note as a “slap in the face”.

“It shows, simply, that the authorities there don’t take the South Africans seriously, and they probably never did.”

Van Vuuren warned that failure to extradite the Guptas to face justice for their crimes “sends the worst possible message”. 

If South Africa fails at accountability for these serious crimes, “you set yourself [up] for the next phase of who else is going to come along”.

Citizens of the world

Last week, African Intelligence reported that the brothers were seeking asylum in two African nations: Cameroon and the Central African Republic (CAR). The latest report by the same publication was that the Guptas had been sighted in Switzerland in late March. 

On Friday, Mashabane said South Africa had no immediate information about the accuracy of media reports relating to the Gupta’s being sighted in Switzerland or their alleged asylum applications to Cameroon and the CAR.

“We don’t have information ourselves,” he said.

In addition to this, Mashabane said South Africa only discovered that the Guptas had acquired citizenship of Vanuatu, an island nation in the South Pacific Ocean, after receiving the diplomatic communication from the UAE embassy on 6 April. 

“In the communication we received, the judgment makes reference to the Guptas being citizens of a country called Vanuatu in the Pacific islands. This was a new development for us because previously their status was that they were carrying South African citizenship,” he said. 

The Interpol Red Notices that led to the Gupta brothers’ arrest are no longer valid, so South Africa would need to seek new ones. This would make the fugitive’s ability to travel to other countries very difficult. 

Prof Iyi said, in his view, South Africa’s best course of action would be to go through Interpol once again.

“I think South Africa’s best option would be to approach Interpol to issue a Red Notice for the Gupta brothers to flag them and pin them down somewhere, and then take it from there,” he said. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • William Kelly says:

    I shan’t be flying Emirates ever again.

    • John Counihan says:

      Absolutely! Let’s do the small things we can to register our disgust. Emirates, like so many “things Dubai” are attempts by the shabby gangster state to disguise itself into respectability. It’s the capital of money laundering in the world. When things got too hot for the daughter of ex-President dos Santos of Angola, where did she run to? That’s right – Dubai. Guptas: Dubai. Esa of Eskom: Dubai. Formula 1 shouldn’t run a Grand Prix there.

    • Rod H MacLeod says:


  • jcdville stormers says:

    Dubai is a small criminal enclave,welcome reality

  • Peter Dexter says:

    In another DM article about BRICS Minister Naledi Pandor names the nations lining up to join BRICS. Among them the UAE. I believe the ANC led government regards the Constitution and Bill of Rights as an inconvenient impediment to their governance. The fact that no high profile Zondo commission prosecutions have been successfully concluded supports my view. Their international relations show a clear affinity for countries run by autocratic dictators with shocking human rights records. It would be naive to believe the ANC cabinet would want the Gupta brothers standing in court spilling the beans.

    • G O says:

      Could’nt agree more.

    • David Forbes says:

      Um, let’s start a discussion about the HR record of the USA, France, the UK, etc. What I am saying is that ALL countries without exception, act in their own best interests, whether that includes HR violations or not. One might also include in the discussion how the CIA and Belgium colluded to assassinate in the most brutal way possible the Congo’s democratically elected leader. And so it goes on and on . . . Let’s not think the West is exceptional, except in its colonial and imperialist barbarity.

  • Peter Doble says:

    Well shock and surprise, the brothers were never coming back to spill the beans.

  • André Pelser says:

    President Ramaphosa and his cabinet are playing the smoke and mirrors game – feigning “shock” with the results of their blatant incompetence and wilful obstruction of justice. Who do they think they are fooling?
    Arab states are notoriously authoritarian and corrupt,”royal” families and dollars rule the roost. But why only focus on corruption in the so-called “Third world”? Switzerland is a haven for dirty money, and has been for decades.
    Money is indeed the root of all evil, banks the enablers. The solution lies in tackling the roots.

    • John Smythe says:

      Indeed. All silver-tongued suits.

    • John Smythe says:

      Vanuatu? Never heard of it. But the country must be seriously desperate to give citizenship to people with a seriously dubious history.

    • Rory Short says:

      The trouble is money is anonymous. If a record was kept of the identities of the holders of every unit of currency throughout it’s life, possible to do in this digital age, then money would no longer be used for any criminal purposes because the criminals couldn’t help leaving a trail discernable by others particularly the authorities.

    • Matsobane Monama says:

      Thanks for looking @ both sides of the coin and who are the original sinners.

    • David Forbes says:

      Money is neutral. It is the LOVE of money that is the root of all evil.

  • Johan Buys says:

    Beyond the criminal trial, SARS can still prosecute. I doubt the Guptas declared their corrupt income and for sure they would have claimed bribes in business expenses = how SARS is tackling China Rail.

  • Ernest Esterhuizen says:

    Why did Zuma establish the Zondo Commission AFTER allowing the Guptas to leave the country? Why was the technicality allowed to creep in with the extradition application? Someone/s knew exactly what they were doing. Of course, there are officials who know exactly what kind of technicality will make such applications fail. My view is that the ANC do not want the Guptas to be brought back and face the music. The misery of all those who have been protecting the guptas will compound – living as a fugitive is a miserable life – living as a thief and an accomplice is equally miserable because you do not know who will turn on you and spill the beans. And what is the sense in sitting with so much stolen money and it cannot be spent freely? Miserable.

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    At this stage we can only hope that Karma takes care of these big fat lying thieves! Sadly the hobbled SA Judiciary will and can do nothing when the politically connected move the goal posts for their mates! As a taxpayer I’m fuming at the unfairness of our predicament….paying taxes meant to help the previously disadvantaged but ending up in Dubai feathering the nests of thieves

    • Marianthe Stacey says:

      I agree completely. SARS must step in to protect and retrieve stolen taxpayers money since the ANC government is complicit with the Guptas and state capture so it hampers any attempts to bring them to justice.

  • Allan Wolman Wolman says:

    And what a welcome relief for the ANC – Embarrassment! Has the ANC ever been humiliated about anything, ever? Much easier to live with embarrassment than the Gupta’s spilling the beans on those ANC leaders many of which have been fingered by the Zondo commission, and yet not a single charge been laid thus far. And never will.

  • D'Esprit Dan says:

    Dubai is a criminal haven for anyone who has loads of cash, needs a comfortable place to hide out until they’ve offloaded it elsewhere and figured out where they can hide next and off they go. Google anything from gold smuggling to money laundering and Dubai is there.

  • George Smit says:

    SA is/was not prepared to arrest Bashar al-Assad or Vladimir Putin and extradite them to The Hague, so they really can’t cry foul if the UAE does the same to them re the Guptas. What goes around, comes around…

  • bushtrack says:

    Take cognizance of fact that SA & UAE entered into an extradition agreement in April 2021. Surely all the legal & regulatory prerequisites are contained in this agreement? Then the question as to why certain documents from SA were not initially included by SA as co-signatory of such an agreement, arise? Were the SA application shoddy? In the UAE Judiciary official statement they claim to have briefed their SA counterparts at every step. Justice & NPA can surely ask for the minutes of every briefing. If the UAE Judiciary cannot provide then surely SA has some foot to stand on and internationally hang out the UAE dirty linen for the rest of the world to see.

  • David Forbes says:

    Nothing this government says can be believed. I’m not even sure they made an application. We have yet to see any of the alleged documents. I don’t think a single SA official went to Dubai to check on anything. Now we want to appeal a judgment while the dudes are in Vanuata? ROTFL!

  • André Pelser says:

    Money talks, always has, always will. Arab states are not paragons of virtue or democracy, never have been, never will be. OPEC and petrodollars rule.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted