Scorpio

SCORPIO NEWS ANALYSIS

Ten months and counting — no sign of a Gupta, no response from justice department

Ten months and counting — no sign of a Gupta, no response from justice department
From left: (Photo: Simon Dawson / Bloomberg via Getty Images) | Atul Gupta. (Photo: Gallo Images / The Times / Puxley Makgatho) | iStock

FROM OUR ARCHIVES - As the criminal trial featuring the Gupta enterprise unravels in South Africa, there is a worrying silence about the status of the country’s application to have Atul and Rajesh Gupta extradited from the UAE.

Below are open-source images of the arrest and capture of Italian crime boss Raffaele Imperiale taken during a Swat team raid at his Dubai mansion in July 2021.

The Mafia kingpin had been on Interpol’s Red List until his arrest and the photographs published by The National in the UAE were captioned as having been supplied by Dubai police.

The accompanying article stated: “In a three-minute video shared by police, a team of elite officers raided the Dubai residence where the Italian was hiding on July 30.”

gupta justice

Images taken during the arrest of Italian crime boss, Rafaelle Imperiale. (Images: Supplied)

Imperiale was extradited to Rome some seven months later.

To date, no such footage has been released of the arrest of Atul and Rajesh Gupta, who are currently the subject of an extradition request from South Africa.

Some 277 days since their arrest on Interpol Red Notices on 2 June 2022, the precise circumstances around this incredibly high-stakes capture remain a mystery.

Were the Gupta brothers nabbed after a dramatic stakeout, was it a hostile capture?

Or, did they simply get chauffeured from their mansion in the Emirates Hills to a local police station where they announced themselves in the company of their lawyers?

Were they cuffed and processed? Let’s just say there are no mugshots from Dubai.

Just 24 hours after their arrest, Dubai police also arrested British billionaire Sanjay Shah. The Dubai-based hedge fund trader faces extradition to Denmark over a $1.7-million tax fraud scam. Shah’s lawyers, Horizons and Co, could not be drawn on much detail, but they confirmed to Daily Maverick that the first leg of his case was concluded in six months. The firm also said the initial extradition hearing kicked off about two to three months after his arrest on 3 June 2022.

Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations

The actual hearing took place over the course of “about” a month and in September the court rejected the Dubai prosecution’s request for Shah’s extradition.

Following an appeal by the Dubai Attorney-General, the case went before the Court of Appeal with a different panel of judges, and on 29 December the initial decision was overturned.

A media release at the time stated that Shah had 30 days within which to lodge an appeal with the country’s highest court and that the outcome was expected within two months of that.

Although the actual extradition hearings in the UAE tend to be confidential, there is no reason why South Africa does not know such basic information about the Gupta case.

Unless of course the Gupta extradition, one that previously got held up by translation issues, is yet to get out of the starting blocks nine months down the line.

Now, as the State’s maiden State Capture prosecution in Bloemfontein shows signs of trouble, it becomes vital for basic information to be disclosed to the SA public at regular intervals.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Vrede dairy project – Defence advocates tear into the State’s corruption case

Valid questions are being asked about the impact that successful applications for section 174 discharges by some of the accused in the Nulane case might have on what is meant to be unfolding in Dubai.

SA authorities have said that this case, with the pending Estina criminal prosecution, informed the application for the extradition of Atul and Rajesh Gupta.

But for now, apart from confirmation of their arrest, submission of an extradition request, mention of an unsuccessful bail bid by the brothers and one request for further particulars from the UAE, South Africans know as little as they did when the Guptas were suspected of doing their fugitive commute between Dubai, India and Uzbekistan.

Questions for the Department of Justice

On 24 February 2023, Daily Maverick asked the SA Department of Justice and the office of Minister Ronald Lamola a set of questions relating to the Guptas.

To date, we have not had acknowledgement of receipt thereof and we have not received a response to the questions. Here we publish them in full.

“The SA government and the UAE confirmed that the Guptas were arrested in Dubai in June 2022.  Please could you assist with the following information for an article that is scheduled for publication in the coming days.

  1. To date, the SA public has no details of the circumstances around that arrest, no details of where Atul and Rajesh Gupta are being held, whether they are in police custody, in a hotel-type detention centre or if they are under house arrest.
  2. Please state whether the SA Department of Justice asked the UAE for the above information, whether it was provided to you and then, when this happened.
  3. Given that the above is but mere colour and ought not to impact their formal extradition process, please state what information the DoJ was given with regard to the circumstances around the arrest of the two Gupta brothers.
  4. Based on reports/accounts provided to you, please state whether Atul and Rajesh Gupta were arrested after a stakeout by Interpol in Dubai or if they simply strolled into a police station in the company of their lawyers?
  5. Has SA asked to physically see the Guptas, even once, since they were arrested in June 2022? If so, please state whether this request was granted and then, if and when such a site visit took place.
  6. If not, kindly confirm whether the DoJ was provided with mugshots of Atul and Rajesh Gupta as confirmation of their capture?
  7. The extradition treaty between SA and the UAE sets out specifics in terms of process. As such, please could you state the date upon which the Gupta brothers’ extradition hearing kicked off in Dubai.
  8. Please state the number of hearings (specifically for extradition and not bail) that have taken place to date and kindly confirm whether the Gupta brothers have attended any of those.
  9. Please state whether South Africa has independent representatives present as observers in the extradition hearing and/or whether UAE law/systems do not permit this.
  10. Please state the number of official reports the DoJ has received about the extradition process — in particular, about the hearing, thus far. And, kindly confirm if this is the DoJ’s only source of information about what is happening in Dubai.
  11. Please state each of the dates — between 2 June 2022 and 24 February 2023 — upon which the DOJ received official updates from the UAE about progress in respect of the extradition process.
  12. Please state, for the record, the names of the SA team responsible for the extradition application. Alternatively, kindly confirm if the team assigned (and announced in 2022) remains the same.
  13. Kindly state if there are any outstanding/additional documents that the UAE has asked for — as at February 2023 — and if so, how has this impacted either the hearing or the start thereof.
  14. Please could you confirm whether — according to reports submitted to you — this extradition hearing has taken place, if it has been concluded and/or whether there has been a ruling and then, whether there is an appeal pending.
  15. Can you confirm whether SA would be able to file, afresh, a new extradition request, should the 2022 application be lost on appeal?

In the wake of the section 174 discharge applications, Daily Maverick also asked the NPA how many updates it had received from the DoJ about the Gupta extradition process. We also asked if the NPA could provide a short summary of the status of the hearing and whether it has started and/or been concluded as yet.

The query was forwarded to Lamola’s office and to date no response has been forthcoming. DM

This article was republished on April 3, 2023, and the headline amended from nine months to 10 months. We republish a month later because the Justice department has not yet responded to our list of 15 burning questions. We shall continue to push for answers.  

The justice department released a general media statement last week stating the following:

“The Ministry of Justice and Correctional Services awaits an update on the status of its extradition application pertaining to Mr Atul Gupta and Mr Rajesh Gupta from the United Arab Emirates. Minister Ronald Lamola is concerned that following a visit by the Central Authority to the United Arab Emirates to ensure that the application meets the requirements of the UAE authorities, there has not been update on the first court appearance of the fugitives to determine whether there will be a hearing on the application for extradition. To date, the Central Authority has made various enquiries, the latest request is an urgent meeting between the two central authorities and the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and his counterpart in the United Arab Emirates. The Ministry is pursuing this matter via the diplomatic channels pursuant to the extradition treaty between the two countries.”

 

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Paul Botha says:

    Isn’t it strange how few photos we have ever seen of the Gupta brothers ever since this whole scandal has taken place.
    It is as if they are ghosts!

  • virginia crawford says:

    Depressing but unsurprising.

  • Roger Lee says:

    Does anyone really believe that the ANC want a real, live Gupta brother on the witness stand in a South African court?

    • Karel Vlok says:

      If the political parties, most of them, must eventually return the tainted “donations” they were gifted, bankruptcy beckons. So either legislation pardons recipients or the brothers will not pop up in a SA court – methinks.

  • Alastair Moffat says:

    The last thing the ANC wants is to have these canaries singing in South Africa.

  • Peter Dexter says:

    The citizens of South Africa want the Guptas in the dock, the South African government should be working flat out to achieve this, but unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last 20 years you know that ANC cadres perceive no distinction between party and state. All their decisions focus on what benefits the ANC. It would be surprising if the Guptas’ evidence was not damaging to the ANC, so an efficient, successful extradition and prosecution would be no more surprising, than seeing cabinet ministers named in the Zondo Commission being successfully prosecuted.

    • Jacques Wessels says:

      What is to be expected with the election coming up the ANC doesn’t need their comrades in the public eye now or possibly ever…

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    We will never see a Gupta facing trail and being convicted. These thieves are the overseers of the looted money which they hold on behalf of the politically connected thieves in Dubai. You can’t think for a minute they paid out bribes before the fact! This way they keep the SA contingent sweet and mailable!……whilst spending the loot on things like R100m weddings in the UAE. The ANC political connections will never expose their part in this corruption… they will block every effort to bring the Guptas back to face trail, in fact they would rather watch quietly in despair as the Guptas spend their share which in turn forces them to find other avenues to rob!

  • Chris 123 says:

    The ANC doesn’t want them back way too many skeletons in that cupboard.

  • Sooi van der Spuy says:

    Reading this article one can only come the conclusion that there is no urgency in getting them back to South Africa to stand trial. Some people high up in government do not want them to be extradited. Zondo opened up some cans with small worms in them but those ones with a single snake tucked cozily under the lid he did not touch. Maybe the Guptas’ will have only a can opener in luggage and no cash.

  • John B says:

    The ANC don’t want the Gupta’s in the dock, they would have no control over who they would implicate in their scheme’s.

  • John B says:

    Well done for keeping on this story and not letting it disappear into the ether like the ANC want it to. There will be lots of nervous cadre’s if they do ever make it back to SA. Am rather surprised that they haven’t done a Gavin Watson or Jeffrey Epstein yet!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options