Defend Truth


Tottenham Hotspur sponsorship deal ‘unlawful and invalid’ – Tourism minister Patricia De Lille

Tottenham Hotspur sponsorship deal ‘unlawful and invalid’ – Tourism minister Patricia De Lille
Patricia de Lille on SA Tourism’s sponsorship proposal. (Photo: Leila Dougan)

In her first media briefing as Minister of Tourism, Patricia de Lille hammered further nails into the coffin of the controversial sponsorship proposal between SA Tourism and Tottenham Hotspurs.

The legal advice received by new Tourism Minister Patricia de Lille states that the proposed sponsorship deal between SA Tourism and British football club Tottenham Hotspurs is “unlawful and invalid”.

De Lille used her first media briefing on Friday 24 March in her new portfolio to allay public concern over the controversial sponsorship proposal, stating that she had already written to the SA Tourism board to gain clarity over various aspects of what she called “one of the key matters in this portfolio”.

The proposed deal, exposed by Daily Maverick in late January 2023, would have seen SA Tourism spend R1-billion over three years to sponsor one of the English Premier League’s best-known teams.

Formally cancelled?

De Lille said that one of the issues she sought clarity on from the SA Tourism board was whether the sponsorship proposal had been “formally cancelled”. And if so, if proof could be provided.

A response to the minister from board chair Thozamile Botha stated: “There is no Tottenham transaction to be cancelled, as none has been concluded. What exists is an in-principle decision to commence the required processes towards conclusion of the transaction.”

The legal counsel obtained by De Lille advised that the Spurs sponsorship contravened the prescripts of the Constitution, the Public Finance Management Act and SA Tourism’s internal supply chain management policy. This was because it amounted to “sole source” procurement without competition, had not been budgeted for, and would have required the prior approval of the relevant minister.

Nature of involvement unknown

The precise nature of former Tourism Minister Lindiwe Sisulu’s involvement in the proposal is still unknown, though sources at the time told Daily Maverick that she was personally supportive of the deal. Sisulu has always denied as much, but it has been confirmed that she signed off on SA Tourism board members’ travel to London to discuss the deal in January 2023.

Botha’s letter to De Lille on behalf of the board described the board’s original approval of the deal as conditional, because “the board was cognisant of the approvals that are required from both the Minister of Tourism and National Treasury, prior to the transaction being consummated and becoming legally binding”.

Botha also continues to claim that SA Tourism executives were about to embark on the required stakeholder engagements when the decision of the board “was leaked to the media”.

Daily Maverick’s information was, however, that executives were on the verge of returning to London to sign the deal when our first article on the matter was published. The PowerPoint presentations on the deal obtained by Daily Maverick also suggested that President Cyril Ramaphosa would announce the sponsorship during his State of the Nation Address less than two weeks later, begging the question of how the necessary engagements would have been completed by that time.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Presidency calls for ‘cool heads’ as SA Tourism launches witch-hunt for Tottenham deal whistle-blowers

A matter which was not touched on by De Lille during her Friday 24 March briefing was the involvement in the deal of SA Tourism’s former acting CFO Johan van der Walt, who was exposed by Daily Maverick as having close ties to an agency that was set to cash in on the deal.  Van der Walt subsequently resigned.

De Lille was asked by journalists whether there would be any consequences for the SA Tourism executives who pushed the deal, including acting CEO Themba Khumalo. The minister did not answer the question directly, saying that she was still gathering information, and awaiting further details from the SA Tourism board.

The board has committed to submitting a “detailed response” to De Lille on aspects including whether the deal amounted to unauthorised or irregular expenditure by 29 March 2023.

De Lille made it clear, however, that her advice to the SA Tourism board “is that the proposal may as well be stopped completely”. DM 


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Nick Miller says:

    And yet the search for the whistle blower goes on!

  • Danie Steyn says:

    The people of this country are deeply indebted to a free press and courageous reporters who keep us aware of the clutches of state capture, and other crime. Thank you Daily Maverick.

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    What should be happening is Tottenham should be matching a SA budget to build soccer fields and facilities in impoverished areas where the young people have nothing better to do than take drugs and drink to eliminate the boredom. There’s a lot of untapped talent out there and an initiative like this would enhance quality of life and self respect!

  • Arthur G says:

    Ouch. It’s colloquially “Spurs”, but the club’s name is Tottenham Hotspur not Tottenham Hotspurs.

  • Johan Buys says:

    What happened to the previous Minister of Tourism?

    Has she been promoted to head of newly created KZN Social Sciences? Her parents must be appalled.

  • Katharine Ambrose says:

    Any passerby could have worked out this was another corrupt project it’s so illogical. However more money got spent on lawyers and all those board members meeting to cover their tracks and make it sound like it was perfectly reasonable.

  • Jennifer D says:

    It is a great relief to read any logical and ethical statement from anyone in government. We are so accustomed to the illogical, unethical and blame everything on apartheid approach, that when someone in government says anything rational it is like pennies from heaven.

  • Jon Quirk says:

    I imagine that Tottenham Hotspur football club could sue for the non completion of a deal that the signatory representing South Africa, clearly held out that she was empowered to so sign? It would be poetic justice were Ms Sisulu to have to fork out a large chunk of her ill-deserved fortune.

  • David Dowling says:

    The looters would have siphoned off at least half, that’s standard procedure. Patricia, congrats and don,t stop until the perpetrators are exposed and “overalled”

  • Stuart MacNeacail says:

    Quick, clear, decisive action from Patricia de Lille on the biggest current issue in her ministry. We need ministers to act like this in all the key portfolios like Health, Education …. ‘Electricity’ etc. Well done, Ma’am.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider
Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz