GANGSTER'S PARADISE, PART TWO
Cross-border crime – SIU probe into stalled R85.7-million Mozambique border wall nears completion
Jersey barriers were seen as a solution to prevent cross-border crime across South Africa’s porous border with Mozambique, but the 8km project that got under way more than four years ago has been on hold pending completion of a Special Investigative Unit investigation into the R85.7 million tender.
Government officials and business people could find themselves in hot water after the Special Investigative Unit (SIU) has completed the probe into the R85.7-million tender to install concrete Jersey barriers – also known as border walls – along the porous fence that separates South Africa and Mozambique in the far north of KwaZulu-Natal.
See Part One here – Violent criminal torchings add to deadly cocktail of unchecked KZN-Mozambique cross-border crime
For years now the border communities of Umkhanyakude District, including Manguzi, Jozini, Mbazwana, Hluhluwe and others, have been under siege from armed cross-border syndicates who attack them in their homes especially at night, rob, abduct them, take them in their own vehicles and dump them there while syndicate members smuggle their (the victims’) vehicles through the porous fence into the Mozambique wilderness.
The installation of concrete Jersey barriers along the porous fence that separates South Africa and Mozambique in the far north of KwaZulu-Natal was hailed as the solution that would bring an end to vehicle smuggling in the area and the brazen activities of cross-border crime syndicates, whose members live on either side of the border fence.
In 2018 an R85, 7 million tender for the construction of an 8km border wall was awarded to ISF Construction and Shula Construction by the KZN Department of Transport.
Several cars were found stuck and abandoned on or close to the small section where the jersey barrier had been installed after members of the syndicates were not able to take the cars to the other side to Mozambique.
But the project came to an abrupt halt after only 166 metres of jersey barriers had been installed and R48-million had been paid to contractors. Some of the jersey barriers have been lying in the villages near the Mozambican border for more than three years.
The SIU said it began its probe after it “received allegations from an unnamed whistle-blower, claiming that the transport department has executed the project of constructing a concrete barrier, despite the legal mandate of such project resting with the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure”.
Among other things, the SIU probed the procurement process and delivery of “value for money”. The unit was also probing allegations of the contravention of KZN Department of Transport procurement processes as well as noncompliance with the Public Finance Management Act.
Kaizer Kganyago, spokesperson for the SIU, said his unit concluded its probe late last year and is now in the process of writing recommendations to President Cyril Ramaphosa.
“Unfortunately, we cannot give out all the details right now because it will go against the process. We are compiling a report to the president. We have made referrals to the KZN Department of Transport for disciplinary action against certain officials that were involved because a lot of things went wrong. We are considering options about setting aside that contract,” he said, adding that government officials, and business people could face criminal cases and or be forced to pay back the money that the KZN Department of Transport has already paid.
“It was not the responsibility of the KZN Department of Transport to issue that project, that was the responsibility of the Department of Public Works and the Border Management. We don’t understand how [the tender] became an issue of the KZN Department of Transport. The probe has found a lot of irregularities in the awarding of that tender,” Kganyago said.
Xolani Zikhali, chairperson of the Umkhanyakude Community Policing Forum said the halting of the installation of jersey barriers has stalled efforts to curb cross-border syndicate activities, especially those that are smuggling vehicles to Mozambique.
“We understand that the project was stopped because of corruption investigations. We know that if they can put these jersey barriers in the hotspots, these syndicates will not be able to smuggle vehicles and many people would be safe from hijackings and abductions,” he said.
Other community members were threatening to protest and close roads in the area until they force the government to resume the jersey barrier project.
Kwanele Ncalane, spokesman for the KZN Department of Transport and Community Safety and Liaison, told eNCA on Tuesday this week that his department was working with the national government to conclude the probe so that the project to install jersey barriers in smuggling hotspots resumes.
“This matter is a subject of discussion between us [KZN Dept of Transport] and the Department of Public Works nationally because when we were doing this project it was an unfunded project on our side therefore [now] the Department of Public Works is going to be seized with this matter,” he said.
Guy Lamb, a criminologist at Stellenbosch University, agreed that installing the jersey barriers could be one of the solutions to curb the smuggling of vehicles. DM
Journalists’ bylines have been withheld for security reasons.
Become an Insider
Another dodgy tender based on racist BEE principles….why are we not surprised by this article!
Oh, so lets waste energy, time, and money blaming others for the F… up. Viva, ANC deployment, Viva.
Another dodgy Tender/Procurement.
When are we, as Tax payers, going to insist that no Tender/Procurements should go out without going through a Government/Taxpayers approved Tender Board. Please let us all insist that this happens immediately – it is the only way to prevent this fraud which seems to occur when any procurement takes place these days. Also we must insist that these project must be managed by competetent Professionals who will be held Accountantable for any over-payments when recommending progress payments for work in progress.
Let’s do something about this…..!
I thought National Treasury is supposed to control this kind of thing. But clearly they aren’t involved at all.
hang on! The Mexicans would have paid for the wall?
Simple : was there a professional Engineer or Quantity Surveyor engaged to provide a monthly valuation? If so, then their responsibility. If not, then the departments head responsibility for signing off on the payment.
One days investigation and ‘Boom!’ charge the responsible person. (if all the material has been delivered then you could get to R48M by the way).
R48 million for 3km of wall? Was these really the lowest bid? Wow!
Just as on the US/ Mexico border, a wall on it’s own will have little to no effect. The (mainly) useless sandf should be restructured and repurposed to patrol all our borders esp with Moz and Zim. I’d love to see the break down of the sandf by rank. I’d bet there are more officers than privates!