Business Maverick

Business Maverick

Treasury slaps Bain with a ten-year ban from state contracts over ‘corrupt and fraudulent practices’

Treasury slaps Bain with a ten-year ban from state contracts over ‘corrupt and fraudulent practices’

The Treasury’s decision follows that of Britain, which became the first western country to impose a similar penalty on Bain for its role in State Capture during Jacob Zuma’s two-term presidency. There is already pressure for private sector companies to eject Bain from their database of suppliers. 

Bain & Co, the Boston-based global management consulting firm, has been hit with a ten-year ban from tendering for government contracts in South Africa because of its “corrupt and fraudulent practices” at the SA Revenue Service. 

The National Treasury announced the ban on Bain & Co on Thursday 29 September — a move that seeks to punish the management consulting firm and hold it accountable for bringing Sars to its knees during the State Capture years. Sars was once a world-renowned tax collection agency.

“The effective date of restriction [or ban from tendering state contracts] is 5 September 2022 until 4 September 2032 for engaging in corrupt and fraudulent practices related to a Sars contract,” the Treasury said in a statement. 

The ban on Bain will apply to any other contract that is awarded in the public sector, said the Treasury, which is responsible for overseeing and approving the procurement function of services and goods in all spheres of the government. The government has a large procurement function, with an annual budget of more than R1-trillion that is spent on purchasing goods and services from private sector companies.

The Treasury said it is working with Sars to boot out Bain from its database of suppliers “through a phased approach”. This work will also extend to the database of other state organs, which might have procured services from Bain. 

The Treasury’s decision follows that of Britain, which became the first western country to impose a similar penalty on Bain for its role in State Capture during Jacob Zuma’s two-term presidency. There is already pressure on the US to follow suit. 


Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations


Lord Peter Hain, the veteran anti-apartheid campaigner, has urged governments around the world to punish Bain for enabling corruption in South Africa. Hain has welcomed the Treasury’s decision, saying it has “established an important precedent” which he hopes that “other governments across the world will follow”. 

“Starting with the US, I wrote to President Biden a few weeks ago requesting he does the same. It is critical that other global consultancies understand that there will be penalties if they are complicit in corruption like Bain was,” Hain said in a statement.

Findings against Bain by commissions of inquiries 

Bain has been marred in serious State Capture findings in recent years. 

Two commissions of inquiries (the Zondo and Nugent Commissions) have placed Bain at the centre of capturing, restructuring, and destroying Sars by colluding with the tax collection agency’s former commissioner Tom Moyane and former president Jacob Zuma. 

In 2014, Moyane awarded Bain the tender to restructure Sars’s operations, including overhauling its IT infrastructure and changing its organisational/governance structure. Bain’s restructuring destroyed key Sars units, including its large business centre, legal and compliance units, and enforcement capacity. About 200 senior managers were displaced, and several skilled employees left Sars, weakening its world-class capacity to collect tax revenue.

Part one of the Zondo commission report found that Sars was a clear example of State Capture and how the private sector colluded with Zuma “to capture an institution that was highly regarded internationally and render it ineffective.”

It’s unclear how much money Bain eked out from the state through contracts. But in 2018, Bain made an undertaking to pay Sars R217-million (including interest) for its botched restructuring of the tax collection agency. 

Bain has accepted that “through various lapses in leadership and governance” it became an “unwitting participant in a process that inflicted serious damage” on Sars. Bain apologised for this but has recently doubled down as it denied participating in or enabling State Capture. Bain recently said “mistakes” were made in its work at Sars, but it remained confident that it “not in any way wilfully or knowingly support State Capture at Sars or elsewhere.”

The Treasury’s decision will likely spark a call for the private sector to also eject Bain from their databases of suppliers. National Treasury’s acting director-general, Ismail Momoniat, has been consistent in calling for companies in the private sector to not do business with Bain. DM/BM

<div data-tf-widget=”K2ptFXjT” data-tf-inline-on-mobile data-tf-iframe-props=”title=How are you surviving Stage 6? Have you exited the Eskom grid” data-tf-medium=”snippet” data-tf-disable-auto-focus style=”width:100%;height:400px;”></div><script src=”//embed.typeform.com/next/embed.js“></script>

 

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Josie Rowe-Setz says:

    This is long overdue. I hope McKinsey and the others which were found guilty of similar behaviour will follow.

  • John Counihan says:

    Yet Sasol hangs in there with Bain?! And is self-righteous about it. Hmmmm.

  • Howard Lazarus says:

    Given the scale and significant and long lasting repercussions of their “corrupt and fraudulent practices”, I see no reason why government does not ban them permanently. It’s important to make an unequivocal statement that this is unacceptable and will never be tolerated in South Africa.

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    But the horse has bolted

  • Craig A says:

    A slap on the wrist! Where are the jail sentences? They paid back some of the money and that makes it OK?
    They will probably create some shell company and weasel their way back in. It is just too easy to make money by ripping off the government.

  • Bruce Anderson says:

    Hmmm…. were these not ANC deployees (Moyane etc) working with Bain? Should not implicated ANC deployees also not pay back their salaries (and perks) with interest and should the ANC also not be banned for 10 years from being in government? Seems more fair to me, its essentially what is being done to Bain.

  • Rob Wilson says:

    Consultants cannot work in an organisation unaided or undetected. The internal link pins must suffer a similar fate, or there will be no justice.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz