DM168

STATE CAPTURE AFTERMATH

Zondo: ‘Commission’s findings must not be stalled’

Zondo: ‘Commission’s findings must not be stalled’
Justice Raymond Zondo hands over the fifth and final Zondo Commission Report into State Capture at the Union Buildings in Pretoria on 22 June 2022. (Photo: Gallo Images / Alet Pretorius)

Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, who chaired the State Capture Commission as deputy Chief Justice, says the rights of individuals bringing review applications have to be balanced against the rights of South Africans to have the commission’s findings implemented, but at the same time nobody has a right to ensure that this work of the commission is ultimately rendered ineffective.

South Africans should ensure that the State Capture Commission findings are not stalled for years by review applications of those offended by them, says Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, who chaired the commission.

“Those against whom findings have been made will definitely use litigation to stall, and to make sure that the recommendations end up never being implemented,” said Zondo in an interview.

The Gupta network mastermind Salim Essa and Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe have launched, and will launch, review applications, and more are expected. The six-part report makes numerous findings against those implicated in State Capture and, as the nearly 6,000-page report is digested, more reviews are expected.

“So, of course, those who have a right to lodge review applications will do so, [but] the people of [SA] will just need to be vigilant. Those who embrace the commission’s recommendations and who think these can contribute to a better [SA], to preventing a repeat of State Capture, what should they do?”

Commissions of inquiry can only make recommendations for further investigations and for policy changes. President Cyril Ramaphosa has said that he will complete and table his recommendations to Parliament by October.

But with the powerful now thudding review applications against the commission across its remaining offices and also amplifying their threats in the media, can it delay implementation?

Zondo says this should not happen. “Clearly, those against whom findings have been made will definitely use litigation to stall, and to make sure that these recommendations end up never being implemented.

“They’ve [the people who appreciate the commission’s work] got to say, how do we make sure that we don’t allow that litigation and those appeals to effectively result in no recommendations being implemented? So, that’s the biggest challenge, because if we are just going to say, ‘Look, they have a right to take whatever action and we must wait,’ it could be 10 years while we are waiting.”

Zondo said the rights of individuals bringing review applications had to be balanced against the rights of South Africans to have the commission’s findings implemented.

“Their rights to challenge the findings must be respected, but at the same time nobody has a right to ensure that this work of the commission is ultimately rendered ineffective. So, there might be a need to expedite processes, so that we don’t wait for years before there is finality. There might be a need to make sure that they are able to exercise their rights to challenge [the findings], but that these are not allowed to drag on for a long time. Steps may need to be taken to make sure, if there are appeals, they are acted upon and are decided by courts without delay and that any attempts to unduly delay be carefully watched,” said Zondo.

The Chief Justice will recuse himself from any review applications that may get to the Constitutional Court and no special reviews court will be set up.

“The high courts have got the experience and, in terms of the Constitution, they do most, if not all, reviews. So, what is important is simply to say what should be done to make sure that in certain categories of cases, at least, [these] should be expedited, because if they are not, the consequences for the country might be very bad.”

Essa has threatened the commission with a damages claim because he is named 806 times in the report, according to a report by Jessica Bezuidenhout in Daily Maverick. He had lawyers on brief throughout the hearings.

The businessman, now based in Dubai, is at the centre of State Capture allegations at three different state-owned companies. He has alleged in his legal papers that the reports made hearsay findings against him, but in fact, the commission’s investigators had to provide evidence to back up every finding it made.

Detailed money-flow forensic investigations by Paul Holden of Shadow World Investigations revealed how companies in the Gupta network, and allegedly controlled by Essa, exported rents out of South Africa and across the world. Essa is under sanction by both the UK and the US. Like the Guptas, Essa wanted the right to cross-examine witnesses and to give testimony from Dubai. The commission declined the demand.

Mantashe said in March when the first commission report was released that he would take it on review. He said in interviews that the fact that the commission had referred the findings against him for further investigation showed that [it] could not make a case of corruption against him. In fact, the commission cannot make findings and has to refer for further investigation by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) because it is different from the police or the prosecuting services.

The reports found that Mantashe had received three different security upgrades to various properties of his from Bosasa, the second major corruption network investigated by the commission.

Mantashe told the commission that the upgrades were gifts from Papa Leshabane, a Bosasa employee and also a friend of many ANC leaders, and made in the spirit of ubuntu.

The ANC’s head of the crime and anti-corruption committee, Tony Yengeni, developed the governing party’s first response to the State Capture Commission. In it, he accused Zondo of straying into political territory by making recommendations including that the party’s cadre deployment policy was unlawful and unconstitutional. But the commission was “political” by its nature in that it made recommendations about governance and policy to guard against the continuation of State Capture networks.

The ANC has set up a committee to review the State Capture Commission findings, chaired by National Executive Committee member Jeff Radebe. It has also said that party members against whom findings have been made by the commission must appear before its integrity commission within months.

On Sunday, Rapport newspaper reported that Ramaphosa has said that the State Capture Commission findings were not binding. The DA is in court seeking an order that ANC cadre deployment be stopped in the light of the Commission’s findings that the policy is unlawful and unconstitutional. DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R25. 

Guide to State Capture

“Over three years, the Zondo Commission heard testimony in 429 hearings from hundreds of people; 779 videos were broadcast on to television screens or desktops of people watching while they worked, or on to the mobile phones of a transfixed nation. The testimony is contained in 429 transcripts over 138,019 pages. That is 276 reams of paper about the story of corruption in South Africa.”

And now, one book to explain it all.

Maverick451 is proud to announce the upcoming publication of award-winning journalist Ferial Haffajee’s Days of Zondo: The fight for freedom from corruption.

The Commission of Inquiry into State Capture brought us staggering testimonies showing the breadth and depth of how South Africa was captured.

Haffajee shines a spotlight on the in­famous players, from the Guptas to former president Jacob Zuma, Salim Essa, Ace Magashule, former NPA boss Shaun Abrahams, Brian Molefe,  Bosasa’s ­Angelo Agrizzi, and many ministers, associates, business leaders and companies.

She explains how this level of corruption became so ingrained, how much money was lost, who needs to answer for State Capture and what accountability could come from it.

With contributions from Ivor Chipkin and an exclusive interview with Judge Raymond Zondo himself, Days of Zondo is the ­definitive guide to the commission.

The book is now available for preorder from the Daily Maverick Shop and is due for release at the end of September. DM168

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Jeroen Dubbelman says:

    The ANC’s head of the crime and anti-corruption committee, Tony Yengeni!

    Who can take the ANC seriously. This man has demonstrated how corrupt he is by accepting his Mercedes and going to prison – on the shoulders of his ANC comrades!

    Is there actually a non-corrupt ANC member? Kriek-Kriek……

    I think you mean “HEAD OF CRIME AND CORRUPTION”!

  • Roy Haines says:

    Unfortunately the Stalingrad delaying tactics (as per the expert Zuma) will be rife if Ramaphosa ever gets round to acting on the Commission’s recommendations. The richer of these crooks will get away scot free and only the lower echelon that didn’t steal enough state resources to pay dubious lawyers will possibly end up in jail. What can be done by the judiciary to avoid this?

  • Paddy Ross says:

    Does Mantashe really expect the citizens of South Africa to believe that Leshabane,”friend of many ANC leaders”, carried out the security upgrades in a spirit of ubuntu? Why didn’t Mantashe pay for this work himself and suggest that Bosasa distributed its overflowing largesse of ubuntu on security in the townships that are ruled by criminal gangs.

  • Johan Buys says:

    Zondo’s team and their files should be moved over to SARS. I have far more hope that SARS can nail the corrupt on tax fraud much much faster than anybody will prosecute them for corruption. 300% penalties plus interest plus the option of criminal sentence if found to lie to SARS in the investigation. There is no chance in hell the corrupt declared their income. Also, if Johnny received R10m and shared that out in kickbacks, such kickbacks are not valid tax deductions so Johnny gets taxed on R10m not what was left.

  • Roelf Pretorius says:

    I think that in SA a regulation/law/criterium must be set that, normally, any court case should be ready for court within six months; after all justice delayed is justice denied, as the saying goes, so why does so many cases worldwide stretch out for decades? To start, the department and legal agencies should just simply employ more investigators and prosecutors/case lawyers, because if you pay twice the number of employees for half the time to do the same work, it is also still going to cost the same. Then something has to be done to neutralise the effect of the so-called “Staligrad” tactics; legal experts should create norms about what is justified in going to court & what is not, and maybe our courts could learn something from the response of the USA Supreme Court to the myriads of unjustified Trump cases before it to try to get the election results (in which he lost) overturned. As I understand, he did not really have any evidence, and in early January 2021 the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the last case “as well as all other similar cases” or something in that order, in effect declaring Trumps’ equivalent of the Stalingrad technique of defense out of order. It is time something similar happens in SA too. Fact is that the saying “justice delayed is justice denied” is true, and it is time that the law-abiding public is protected from the injustice of the Stalingrad technique also.

  • Chris Green says:

    A Luta (will) Continua !! So, the question remains – did CR-ook lie to the Zondo Commission chair and all the citizens of our wonderful country when he “giggled ” in response to so many questions from the Chair himself. And did the Chair, in hind sight, allow himself to overly trust the CR-ook when the Chair accepted the CR-ook response that “maybe that is for another forum ” giggle, giggle !!
    CR, time to call it as it is. From all reports, you are a liar and a crook and you lead a party which is “a collective ” of this !! The apartheid government used to do these “about-turns “and so-called clever or smart declarations – well, nationalism black or white remains toxic and a human rights abuse.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Get DM168 delivered to your door

Subscribe to DM168 home delivery and get your favourite newspaper delivered every weekend.

Delivery is available in Gauteng, the Western Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, and the Eastern Cape.

Subscribe Now→

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz