Ramaphosa's energy plan Webinar banner

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Two activist groups file contempt of court papers again...

Our Burning Planet


Activist groups file contempt of court papers against Amazon Africa headquarters developer

Building activities on the banks of the Liesbeek River on 8 February 2022 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / ER Lombard)

After weeks of resumed construction on the urgently interdicted Amazon Africa headquarters, contempt of court papers have been filed against the developer.

Two groups opposed to the Amazon Africa headquarters development at the River Club in Cape Town have filed contempt of court papers against the developer following resumed construction after an urgent interdict was granted against the development. 

The Observatory Civic Association (OCA) and Goringhaicona Khoi Khoin Indigenous Traditional Council (GKKITC) on Friday filed the papers on the basis that the developer, the Liesbeek Leisure Properties Trust (LLPT), was in defiance of Western Cape High Court Judge Patricia Goliath’s interdict order, which ruled that no construction was to continue until meaningful consultation had been carried out by the developer.  

Filings have been made against some members of the LLPT, the City of Cape Town, the Western Province’s minister for local government, environmental affairs and development planning, as well as the Western Cape First Nations Collective, a faction of the First Nations.  

About two weeks ago, the LLPT publicly announced that it was conducting “remedial work” on the construction site and was continuing to carry out work on the structure. The developer said it was proceeding on the basis that it was appealing against the urgent interdict at the Supreme Court of Appeal. The City of Cape Town and the Western Cape provincial government joined the efforts to appeal against the decision.  

In her ruling, Judge Goliath said economic benefits could never override the rights of the First Nations people. She further prohibited the developer “from undertaking any further construction, earthworks or other works on erf 151832 (the site), Observatory, Western Cape” until the high court reviews the relevant approval decisions. 

The Liesbeek Action Campaign, consisting of the GKKITC and OCA, said the continued work on the interdicted site was not permissible and that the argument of continuing construction until the final appeal judgment is heard, was “incorrect”.  

Tauriq Jenkins, the high commissioner of the GKKITC, told Daily Maverick that they had filed the court papers in order to end the “miscarriage of justice” occurring at the River Club development.  

“This is a show of hubristic arrogance at its worst, where it would appear that the LLPT thinks it can be a law unto itself. In our view, a heritage crime has been committed, and this unabridged exhibition of coloniality and contempt is a miscarriage of justice,” Jenkins said.  

The ruling had been granted on the basis that some of the First Nations were not meaningfully consulted and that the significance of the intangible heritage of the First Nations had not been taken into account.  

“We are expecting them to be found guilty of contempt of court and hence get a prison sentence,” Gertrude Fester, honorary professor at the University of Cape Town’s Centre of African Studies/San and Khoi Unit and coordinator of the A/Xarra Restorative Justice Forum, told Daily Maverick.  

Fester added that there were two major concerns over the case: “Respect for the environment; it is a fragile environment, one which had been desecrated over the centuries. It is land sacred to the First Nations.”  

The LLPT said that it would ask the court to dismiss the application. It said the construction work was not contravening the law and that the decision had been suspended until the matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal.  

“The LLPT therefore categorically denies the accusation that it is in contempt of court as there is no basis for this allegation. It will now be for the Western Cape High Court to decide on the matter,” the developer said. DM/OBP


Absa OBP

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 2

  • Such loss of perspective by these protesters with no concern for the broader issues at play here.
    Misdirected energy in my view.

  • A few questions: a) What are the bona fides of the Goringhaicona Khoi Khoin Indigenous Traditional Council? Are they an elected body? b) Why, exactly, are the The Observatory Civic Association getting involved? c) What have the above two bodies done in the past to improve this piece of degraded land? d) Why are the lawful owners of the land (having fullfilled their leagal obligations, and other than the arguements already raised by the GKKITC and OCA) being prevented from completing this project? e) Who is paying the (not inconsiderable costs of the GKKITC and OCA) in filing interdicts, and what are the motives of whoever is paying? It seems the GKKITC and OCA are going to employ the Stalingrad tactic, and Cape Town may be left with not only the unfinished foreshore freeway, but a River Club site half covered in concrete!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted