South Africa

ET TU, CJ OFFICE?

Tenderstorm hits Zondo office over Thomson Reuters contract on eve of State Capture final report

Tenderstorm hits Zondo office over Thomson Reuters contract on eve of State Capture final report
Chief Justice Raymond Zondo sits with a bombshell on the eve of releasing the final edition of the State Capture commission report. (Photo: Gallo Images / Beeld / Lisa Hnatowicz)

In the week he is to release the final edition of the State Capture Commission report, three top staff members of Chief Justice Raymond Zondo’s office have seemingly made themselves overnight millionaires in a Thomson Reuters court management contract that has the hallmarks of many of the corrupt deals the Chief Justice has been investigating. Thomson Reuters has put the contract on hold.

Thomson Reuters has put on hold a contract with three senior staff members of the Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) who resigned on 31 May and started work on 1 June as shareholders of a multimillion-rand contract with the international media and services conglomerate.

“We are looking into this matter with utmost seriousness and have launched a formal investigation to understand the facts. During this investigation, all work with the subcontractor ZA Square [the company owned by the three former state employees] has been put on hold,” said Thomson Reuters spokesperson Dave Moran.

Thomson Reuters bought CaseLines, a cloud-based case management and court administration platform, in 2020. It has been successfully used in the UK and elsewhere to reduce court backlogs, digitise systems and allow online hearings. It was a boon for the judiciary in Gauteng, where a pilot was rolled out just ahead of Covid-19.

thomson reuters bombshell Mncube

Chief Justice Raymond Zondo’s former spokesperson Nathi Mncube. (Photo: Twitter / @JayedLeigh)

The Sunday Times reported that former CFO Casper Coetzee, Zondo’s spokesperson Nathi Mncube and case management director Yvonne van Niekerk left the Office of the Chief Justice on 31 May and set themselves up on 1 June as 30% shareholders, via ZA Square, of the CaseLines deal with Thomson Reuters in South Africa.

It is likely worth about R70-million, which would have made the three officials overnight millionaire shareholders when they started their new jobs on 1 June. 

“The OCJ is currently gathering all relevant information relating to the matter and is taking legal advice… We can assure the public that the State funds relating to this matter are safe,” said Chief Justice Raymond Zondo’s office in a statement on Sunday, 12 June. 

Zondo has a lot on his plate this week. He has to finalise an investigation into how information broker Ismail Abramjee inserted himself into the criminal justice system to pass on information about a Public Protector decision, allegedly from judges to prosecutors.

Then, the State Capture Commission of Inquiry’s final report is meant to drop on 15 June. 

The section on the State Security Agency is likely to have at least contributed to the Phala Phala farm scandal now roasting President Cyril Ramaphosa. Details were made public by former spy boss Arthur Fraser, and have shaken the Presidency. 

Fraser is smarting because he alleges he did not get to have his say before the commission’s proceedings. His application to cross-examine witnesses failed because he would not depose himself to an affidavit and, therefore, subject himself to scrutiny.

Now, three top staff of the Office of the Chief Justice have allegedly made themselves overnight millionaires in a deal that has the hallmarks of many of the corrupt deals Zondo probed for four years as chairperson of the State Capture Commission.

Moran told the newspaper that the contract for CaseLines was initially to be signed as a straight bilateral between it and the OCJ. But then the government told Thomson Reuters to add a 30% local contractor. It is unclear how it contracted with the three staffers who adjudicated its winning bid to modernise and digitise the documents that allow online court hearings. 

‘No conflict’

“By current legislation, Thomson Reuters was required to provide a South African local subcontractor for the Professional Services portion of the larger contract,” said Moran.

Mncube told the Sunday Times he was not conflicted; Coetzee said there was no issue with him overseeing the bid adjudication committee of the OCJ and then later winning the deal with the Canada-based multinational.

Many of the biggest scandals exposed at the Zondo Commission have involved multinationals subcontracting with connected insiders. 

Procurement rules were bypassed or ignored, and the same thing appears to have happened in this case. The multinational companies included McKinsey, which shoved aside its local partner Letsema to twin with the Gupta associate company Trillian and Regiments at Eskom.

Bain, China North Rail, China South Rail, the aviation company AAR, the cargo and apron aviation handler Swissport, SAP, and others all came short in the commission and other proceedings for aiding State Capture and corruption.

The CaseLines deal looks like it is taken from the same playbook, leaving the Office of the Chief Justice with a big problem. 

thomson reuters zondo bomshell

Chief Justice Raymond Zondo (Photo: Gallo Images / Daily Maverick / Felix Dlangamandla)

“CaseLines plays a significant role in improving access to justice and reducing court backlog in South Africa. Our immediate priority is to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter,” said Moran.

Lawyers say that the CaseLines system works very well and enabled court proceedings to continue through the Covid-19 pandemic. Several judges, including Zondo, held up the pilot CaseLines project as one of the most significant achievements for the judiciary when they were being interviewed for new jobs before the Judicial Service Commission. 

The judiciary piloted the plan in Gauteng, and this new contract is part of a necessary national roll-out.

Zondo will have to ensure an immediate investigation so that the system of modernising an often still-analogue court system is not delayed. But this may well mean another delay in the final State Capture Commission report coming out as planned on 15 June. DM

 

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • virginia crawford says:

    Employment contracts need to be tightened up, so that it is easier to sue individuals. Private companies can prohibit trade in a similar field after departure: surely something similar can apply to government employees. Also, it’s odd how incompetence is blamed for so much, but when it comes to feathering their own nests, government officials are real live wires. Do people work for government simply to get connected?

  • William Kelly says:

    It’s unreal. The people Zondo himself has around him ‘see no conflict’ of interest between awarding and participating in their own enrichment. If this still needs to be explained using crayons and finger puppets frankly it’s everyone for himself now. All public funds are there to plunder, knock yourselves out as best you see fit. Of course if you can find some private funds too, as our ‘continuously surprised and shocked’ president has shown, more power to you too. Just be warned, you may find SARS has already adopted the approach of stealing it before you do. Now. If there was no money to steal to begin with what would happen I wonder? Sigh. Is there anything, anything at all that the few good people left in this country can do without being plundered and punched in the nose and robbed by the State of whatever they have left? I doubt it. We’d need a commission of enquiry, some new laws, much talk about action and of course exorbitant and corrupt expenditure to fund it all. Which… wait,
    …. gives me an idea….

  • William Stucke says:

    “By current legislation, Thomson Reuters was required to provide a South African local subcontractor for the Professional Services portion of the larger contract” . . .

    This the crux of the problem we face. Tenders are adjudicated on either an 80/20 or 90/10 basis. Ten or 20% of the total score for the bid (made up of Price, Performance, Service, Reputation, Timeline, etc.) is awarded to the bidder simply for having a local BEE partner. The justification is to “transfer skills” and other meaningless terms that sound good. . . .

    In far too many cases, that partner provides zero value, and simply increases the cost to Government, enriching some undeserving party in the process. THIS is the primary enabler of corruption. Well meaning but fundamentally stupid legislation.

  • Gerrit Marais says:

    It just does not stop. Will it ever?

  • T Mac says:

    Another example of the problems caused by BEE? The 30% “local requirement” should never have been necessary

  • Carol Green says:

    It’s appalling that these three former OCJ officials don’t see the conflict of interest! What about restraint of trade??

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.