South Africa


Lest we forget: It is indeed the ANC who ruined Eskom

Lest we forget: It is indeed the ANC who ruined Eskom
Busisiwe Mavuso, Eskom board member and CEO of Business Leadership South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Masi Losi)

When the full history of the ANC in government is written one day, one of its biggest governance failures will be Eskom and its failure to continue providing uninterrupted electricity to the people of South Africa and its economy.

It is a continuing failure of governance that shows up many of the worst aspects of the nationwide movement that did so much to bring freedom to this country. Now, unfortunately, there is more evidence that the politics of the issue matters more to some in the party than actually serving people by, say, working hard on fixing the electricity crisis as quickly as possible.

This has been demonstrated in recent days by the way the ANC responded to the situation involving the Eskom board member Busisiwe Mavuso and her interaction with Parliament.

Last week, our people and the economy suffered through Stage Four load shedding, with blackouts happening at least twice a day for most people. In many places, so bad is the infrastructure that it simply does not come back. In Eldorado Park, this led to bitter protests after they were left without electricity for more than a week.

Despite this grim reality, there was no loud public comment from the Department of Energy. There was no loud public comment from the Department of Public Enterprises. And there was no statement from any part of the ANC issued on its media group.

On Friday last week, Parliament’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) was conducting part of its oversight hearings into the situation at Eskom. During this session, Eskom board member Busisiwe Mavuso said that she objected to any claim that the board or its executives were responsible for the present situation. 

Rather, she said, the leadership of Eskom could not be held responsible for the “mess”; Andre de Ruyter could not be the “fall guy” and that this was “a mess of the ANC-led government”.

ANC members on the committee objected, saying they had not blamed the current leadership, while the Scopa chair, the IFP’s Mkhuleko Hlengwa, was furious. He said that Mavuso had not conducted herself properly. She left the meeting, with more angry words exchanged between them.

There were various responses in the hours after that incident.

The department of Public Enterprises, which had appeared to be silent on load shedding until that time, said it found her conduct “regrettable” and “unbecoming”. It also said, “the department is giving this matter active consideration”.

The ANC’s study group on Scopa also spoke in public. Its chair, Bheki Hadebe said: 

“At no stage did Scopa members apportion blame to the current board members on the historic challenges of Eskom. It is for this reason that we take strong exception and we condemn with the contempt it deserves, the conduct that was displayed.”

For some voters, this may suggest that some in the ANC and some in government feel that condemning Mavuso’s conduct is more important than actually dealing with load shedding. Otherwise, why speak about one, but not the other?

It is hard to speculate about why Mavuso behaved as she did. Certainly, her conduct is probably unparliamentary, and one can imagine Hlengwa’s frustration as the chair.

That said, Mavuso may feel that it was important to make her point in the way she did.

This is because when there is load shedding, many people immediately blame the current leadership and particularly the Eskom CEO De Ruyter. She may have felt that as a board member, if she did not defend him and the current executive, no one else would.

Also, she may, as political strategists might put it, “want the issue” in that she actually wants the public debate to be about who’s to blame for this situation, knowing that this will in the end make people remember at every moment that it is the ANC.

It is hard to argue against such a conclusion.

To state the history of load shedding briefly (and to over-simplify): In 1998 a government White Paper stated that we would run out of power in 2007. The ANC government ignored this for too long. When it started to build Medupi and Kusile, budgets were overrun, deadlines were busted and corruption was rampant. 

It was the Japanese company Hitachi that won the contracts to build the boilers at Medupi. The ANC investment vehicle Chancellor House was a shareholder in Hitachi SA (American authorities viewed this as corruption and fined Hitachi for this transaction).

Op-Ed: Chancellor House the focus of Hitachi’s $19m SEC settlement

Then, during the Zuma era, people such as Brian Molefe, Anoj Singh and Matshela Koko ran Eskom. They have all been exposed and credibly accused of corruption in various forms and are certain to have findings made against them in the incoming Zondo Commission’s report on Eskom. McKinsey had to repay more than R1-billion for work it claimed to have done.

McKinsey and other State Capture enablers: Paying back fees is not enough

Meanwhile, the ANC is acutely aware of how important load shedding is to its constituency. It has said that one of the reasons it did so badly in last year’s local elections is that there was intense load shedding just before people voted.

There can be no doubt about its culpability. Otherwise, why would the party have apologised for load shedding in the past?

Mavuso also has a constituency of her own. As CEO of Business Leadership SA (and a board member of Business Unity South Africa), she may well feel that it is important for certain points to be made. She also does not necessarily need the Eskom board job, which gives her a certain freedom.

It may also be important to remember who appointed her in the first place. It was not current Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan. 

Rather, it was then deputy president Cyril Ramaphosa.

She was appointed early in 2018 along with the rest of the present board, just after Ramaphosa had taken over as leader of the ANC, but before Jacob Zuma had been removed as president. His appointment of the new Eskom board was one of the first signs that Ramaphosa was asserting himself.

Also, it is not the first time that Mavuso has actually ruffled feathers in this position, and in Parliament. During a meeting with the committee on appropriations, she said that there had been political interference in decisions about when to introduce load shedding.

In that instance, as reported in The Sowetan in late October 2019, she said that she wanted to be honest, “so that we don’t sit here trying to manage each other”. When it came to Eskom, she continued, “This thing is falling apart — and it falling apart means it’s going to sink the economy down with it.”

This suggests that even then, before the pandemic, some members of Eskom’s board were frustrated with the way politicians were managing the problem.

One of the board’s major concerns might be, what happens if De Ruyter or other senior executives do resign? Who would replace them?

Previous CEO Phakamani Hadebe resigned, saying that the job was ruining his health and that he had collapsed twice due to the position. It is, in many ways, a thankless job. And anyone with the ability to do the job would surely earn much more in the private sector and have a much easier life.

The scale of the problem is massive. Never mind the ageing power stations, or the fact that the Energy Ministry appears to ignore De Ruyter’s beseechment that it should allow more independent power production, more quickly.

The Special Investigating Unit has said it is investigating more than 5,000 Eskom employees for misconduct. This is a humongous number and indicates that a culture of corruption has taken hold at Eskom over decades.

Meanwhile, the consequences of load shedding and what appears to be the continued inability of the ANC to fix the problem it made, are monstrous.

No economy can grow during this time, people remain unemployed and a process of de-networkification is now under way as the rich buy themselves out of the public power networks, meaning that they will no longer subsidise the poor.

Golf islands in a sea of poverty — it doesn’t have to be this way, but we need to act with urgency

And it is the poor, those who are left jobless, in the cold, in the dark, to fend for themselves, who are suffering.

All while the politicians argue about the tone of a statement in a parliamentary meeting. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Harro von Blottnitz says:

    Parliament should not micr0-manage Eskom’s leadership, though oversight is crucially important. There is too much ‘energy politics’ but surprisingly little ‘energy policy’ in this country.

  • Joe Soap says:

    This interaction is on YouTube for all to see. Ms Busisiwe Mavuso was not unbecoming. She simply stated her position, which was a solid one. The problem I have is that someone shouts out, ‘what is a fact’. Do we really need people in parliament that don’t know basic English: A fact is something known to be true. It is known to be true the ANC created the Eskom mess. It is also known to be true that the ANC created the mess that is South Africa. Let’s fix the mess rather than debate what is a fact.

  • Barrie Lewis says:

    Add to this there are undoubted, proven acts of sabotage happening at Eskom. Fifteen years ago we acted with disbelief and even amusement when then PE minister Alec Erwin said that there had been an act of sabotage at Koeberg. The way suddenly so many turbines go down together as happened over Easter, the huge explosion in a turbine at Medupi, all suggest that there is some ‘third force’ that sees merit in making sure that Eskom falls.
    Without intensive investigation by our intelligence services and police to consider these many issues, Eskom will continue to fail, and SA with it.

  • Peter Doble says:

    Anyone with a brain cell knows it. Ms Mavuso merely voiced it. No doubt she has an exit planned while those left behind wallow in the ANC’s mess.
    The saddest fact is that it is considered that anyone who challenges the structures is wrong and that those responsible shy away from blame. So the only result will be more blah, blah blah followed by the baa, baa, baas.

  • Miles Japhet says:

    Cadre deployment is ANC communist inspired policy. Nothing short of a statement by Ramaphosa and his cabinet, with follow through, is that this, and BBBEE, are to end will give our country the hope of rebuilding an economy in which the poor have hope.

  • virginia crawford says:

    Bravo and thanks to Ms Mavuso for speaking truth to power, literally. And the hissy fit thrown by chair would be comedic if the consequences were not so dire. As usual, put the party before the people. P.S. Conduct unbecoming? This from a party where CR uses the f-word and people like Mbalula are extremely rude and dismissive? Unbelievable!

  • Joseph Donnelly says:

    The truth hurts!! I compliment this lady for standing up to these politicians who continue to interfere with the running of a sick organization, the sooner electricity generation is taken over by private industry and the ANC stay out of it the better.

  • anton kleinschmidt says:

    When “the full history of the ANC is written” it will reveal that rampant corruption, unbelievable incompetence, misused BBBEE and misused EE combined to destroy the fabric of our society. Eskom will be a sub text of this historical FACT.

    We need to cut out the BS and get straight to the truth. The truth is that Mavusa is most emphatically the hero of the moment. She speaks truth to “power” in unequivocal language. She does not allow political hacks to hide the truth or deflect her. She represents exactly what South Africa needs. No arguments.

    The President needs to support her and publicly denounce all those political hacks who tried to use their power to silence her and damage her standing.

    The Eskom lenders, banks, etc, need to speak out immediately, very forcefully and publicly to protect Mavuso and de Ruyter. They need to make it very clear that if this nonsense does not stop they will withdraw their funding. If they fail to do so then they can expect history to include them as a cause of our demise.

  • Louis Potgieter says:

    Had Mantashe provided more solar energy capacity years ago, we would now be having less load-shedding, and less diesel usage and expense, at least by day. And a better economy.

    Gwede must go.

  • Peter Atkins says:

    A good start would be for the government to replace Gwede Mantashe with Busisiwe Mavuso as the DMRE minister rather than criticising her for bringing up inconvenient truths. Oh well, one can dream …

  • Murray Izzett says:

    It is most telling that the issue of stating where the problem originated, and how that problem persists to this day, remains a bigger issue than the fact that the very institutions that were put in place to protect against the rise of these problems actually enabled them. Note: Problem = rent seeking from large capital projects or other large scale corruption that favoured the ANC or its leadership

  • Craig King says:

    It’s a pity these ANC folk can’t multitask, you know be corrupt and deliver electricity at the same time. Or maybe it is all just too complicated for them to manage.

  • Ryckard Blake says:

    The puppet chairing the SCOPA hearing IFP Mkhuleko Hlengwa should have called the ANC committee member Bheki Hadebe to order, not ranted at a senior testifier as if she were a schoolgirl, subject to Hlengwa’s biased whims under the guise of “Parliamentary conduct”.
    What are Eskom directors and executives expected to know about what is and what is not parliamentary conduct? What has Hlengwa had to say about the Red Mob’s totally uncivilized chanting, jeering and even physical mobbing in what passes for SA’s parliament?
    Methinks parliament’s truly pathetic SCOPA under Hlengwa has got FAR too big for its boots.

  • Johan says:

    Two factors make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for some to exercise oversight for the better: kneeling at the altar of a political ideology and when the consequences of actions only becomes visable over a longer period of time.

  • Confucious Says says:

    It’s always “collective responsibility”, the communists cry… Now that they have been fingered, it’s every man for himself… as communists implement. The ANC cannot run a bath, let alone a commercial entity.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.