Defend Truth


International war crimes prosecutor again slams SA for thwarting arrest of Rwandan genocide suspect

International war crimes prosecutor again slams SA for thwarting arrest of Rwandan genocide suspect
Prosecutor Serge Brammertz gives a statement on November 22, 2017 in The Hague, The Netherlands. (Photo: Michel Porro/Getty Images)

In three-and-a-half years SA has done nothing to help bring a former police inspector, accused of killing over 1,500 people trapped in a church, to book. 

International war crimes prosecutor Serge Brammertz again hammered South Africa this week for its failure to help him arrest the suspected Rwandan genocidal killer Fulgence Kayishema.

Brammertz is a prosecutor of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT) which is completing the unfinished cases of the UN war crimes tribunals on Rwanda and former Yugoslavia, which have been disbanded. 

Fulgence Kayishema. (Photo: Supplied)

He told the United Nations Security Council in New York this week that “the situation with South Africa is among the most severe instances of non-cooperation my office has faced since the Mechanism’s establishment”.

Brammertz said his office had faced “immense” challenges over three years in trying to get Pretoria’s cooperation in arresting Kayishema and providing critical information.

His office had submitted an urgent request three months ago to establish a joint investigation team and he had visited Pretoria in November to discuss the matter, he said. 

“Unfortunately, I am unable to provide a more positive update today,” he said.  “South Africa is still failing to adhere to its international obligations.”

Brammertz gave much the same message to the Security Council in his annual report a year ago. In that report he said that South African authorities had refused even to place Kayishema under provisional arrest, when tribunal investigators had traced him to Cape Town in 2018.

This was despite an international United Nations warrant for his arrest which all UN members were obliged to implement. Nor had Pretoria even placed him under surveillance, Brammertz said last year. As a result Kayishema had escaped from South Africa in 2019 and had not yet been found. 

Brammertz said in 2020 that Pretoria had refused to arrest Kayishema on the grounds that he had been given refugee status. But later the Department of Home Affairs claimed that it had lost both his refugee file and his fingerprints, which the tribunal needed to confirm his identity. 

Kayishema allegedly bulldozed a church filled with 2,000 Tutsis in Rwanda days after the start of the genocide in 1994, killing over a thousand people.

“My office alleges that Kayishema, the local police inspector, played an important role in the 16 April 1994 massacre at Nyange Church,” Brammertz said last year. 

“In the days leading up to the massacre, 2,000 Tutsi civilians – women, men, children and elderly – sought refuge in the church. 

“Initially, militias surrounded the church and launched an attack, including throwing hand grenades into the packed building. While many were wounded and killed, the refugees resisted, forcing the attackers to retreat. 

“Determined to murder these innocent civilians, local leaders, including Kayishema, brought a bulldozer to the church grounds. In an act of unimaginable brutality and sacrilege, the bulldozer was used to demolish the church with the refugees still inside. More than 1,500 were crushed to death. Survivors who escaped were hunted down and killed. Kayishema fled from justice, and remained a fugitive for years. “

“But almost three years ago, my office finally located him. Relying on records and sources, my office concluded in early 2018 that Kayishema was living in Cape Town, South Africa. This was confirmed by South African authorities via Interpol in August 2018. We immediately submitted an urgent request for assistance to South Africa seeking his prompt arrest. 

“So we were surprised to be informed that because Kayishema had been granted refugee status in South Africa, he could not be handed over to the Mechanism. This excuse was withdrawn months later, replaced with a new argument that South Africa lacked a legal basis to cooperate with the Mechanism. 

“After sixteen months of intense negotiations, in December 2019, South Africa finally submitted the UN arrest warrant for execution, which a local magistrate approved. However, by then, Kayishema could no longer be found. It is important to note that my office has reliable information that Kayishema was present in South Africa as late as October and November 2019, so merely weeks before South Africa reported in the Security Council that the arrest operation was unsuccessful.

“Little has improved since. A year ago, after the failed arrest, my office submitted an extensive request for assistance detailing information we required to continue the pursuit of Kayishema. Yet our request still has not been satisfactorily answered. 

“Two months ago in October, it was agreed that my office would send a technical team to Pretoria to finally receive the requested material. The foreign affairs and justice ministries convened a number of joint meetings with responsible officials. 

“But the Department of Home Affairs, which has responsibility for key information, did not attend as scheduled. My office was then again requested to send last week another mission to specifically meet with the Department of Home Affairs and receive outstanding documents. To our great surprise, on the last day of the mission, Home Affairs representatives informed us that Kayishema’s refugee file and fingerprints do not exist. This is difficult to understand.”

Brammertz told the UN Security Council  last year that he was reporting these facts “to explain why, despite all my office’s efforts, Kayishema remains at large”. 

“The situation raises many questions. How can it be that South Africa refused to arrest Kayishema two and a half years ago based on a refugee file that it is now claimed doesn’t exist? And why didn’t authorities take obvious measures after being informed that an internationally wanted fugitive indicted for genocide was present in their country? 

“Despite a UN warrant calling for Kayishema’s immediate arrest, South African authorities did not provisionally detain him or put him under any surveillance to prevent his escape.”

Brammertz added in his report last year that it is important to move forward and finally arrest Kayishema. He then appealed directly to South Africa’s representative in the Security Council – where South Africa had been serving as a temporary member for the past two years – to finally help his tribunal find Kayishema.

“Empower your operational services – particularly police and prosecutors – to work directly with us on a day-to-day basis. And truly give them your full political and diplomatic support, as well as the resources they require to help us. I am prepared to visit Pretoria in the new year to discuss our further cooperation and agree on a clear joint strategy and operational arrangements. This would also send the right message to other capitals.”

Daily Maverick asked the Departments of Justice and Correctional Services for comment but had received none before publication. DM 





Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Patrick Devine says:

    The only question is are the cadres incompetence or driven by malice ?

  • Coen Gous says:

    Well, if this is the government’s (ANC) attitude, how the hell are we ever going to get cooperation from Interpol to get the Gupta’s extradited.

  • Charles Parr says:

    It’s plain stupidity. And CR complains about vaccination apartheid while we’re sitting on a pile that no one wants. It must be hell waking up every morning thinking that the whole world hates you because of the colour of your skin and then you proceed to show the world your middle finger. This country never ceases to amaze me. Maybe Ronnie should be the McDonalds mascot instead of Minister of Justice.

    • Coen Gous says:

      Never learned how to do these small figures (thumps up/down, smile/depressed, etc.) But this one gave me a smile (ugly as it is). Ronnie? Careful, he might be the next president. In the US they have these “Karen’s”, basically depicting white women screaming help (to the police or whoever) whenever a black man is in close vicinity. “Help, there is a man of African origin walking toward me on the public path”.

  • Richard Goldstone Goldstone says:

    As the first Prosecutor of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, I read the article by Peter Fabricius with both embarrassment and anger. The Department of Home Affairs appears to have acted in violation of its obligations under a binding and peremptory resolution of the Security Council. The report by Prosecutor Brammertz to the Security Council displays a contempt by the Government for its international obligations. The Department, and indeed the Government, owe a full explanation to the United Nations, to the Rwandan victims of the 1994 genocide and no less to the people of South Africa.
    Richard J Goldstone

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options