X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Former Prasa chairperson’s company got R99m in ill-fa...

South Africa

DAYS OF ZONDO

Former Prasa chairperson’s company got R99m in ill-fated locomotive deal, inquiry told

Illustration: Sfiso Buthelezi. Photo: Dean Hutton / Bloomberg via Getty Images) | Popo Molefe. (Photo by Gallo Images / Beeld / Lisa Hnatowicz)

During evidence led on Thursday at the State Capture Commission, it was confirmed that Sebenza Forwarding and Shipping had been paid R99m during the ill-fated Swifambo deal.

On Thursday, Sfiso Buthelezi, the former board chairperson of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), denied he had benefited from the ill-fated Swifambo deal through his companies, including Sebenza Forwarding and Shipping. 

During a virtual sitting of the State Capture Inquiry, Prasa evidence leader advocate Vas Soni SC said Buthelezi had applied for leave to cross-examine forensic investigator Ryan Sacks and former Prasa board chairperson Popo Molefe. 

Sacks had been appointed by the Hawks to check money flows out of Prasa to Swifambo during the ill-fated locomotives deal. 

Read in Daily Maverick: Now officially just a front – Prasa tall trains supplier seeks to dodge R2.6bn claim because he wasn’t a ‘real bidder’

Sacks, during previous testimony alleged that Buthelezi had not disclosed his interests in Sebenza Forwarding and Shipping and his interests in Makana Investment Corporation, of which he was chief operating officer. Sacks read out that Sebenza had billed Swifambo just over R100-million for work done and had been paid R99-million by the front company. 

Buthelezi, through an affidavit read out by Soni, denied there was a conflict as he had no longer been a director of Sebenza or Makana when the Swifambo deal was signed – if this was an issue, he would then have dealt with it before the deal was finalised. 

Sacks said concerns were raised internally about Buthelezi’s involvement but the deal went through during the tenure of former CEO Lucky Montana. 

Buthelezi, via his affidavit also stated he “played no special role” in approving the Swifambo deal. 

He said there was “no truth” in the suggestion that he benefited from the Swifambo deal through Makana or Sebenza. Sacks said he accepted “this was Mr Buthelezi’s view”, but in his recommendations to the Hawks, the agency should further investigate links between Buthelezi’s companies and Prasa. 

This is not the first time Buthelezi’s links to Sebenza and Makana – as well as another company called Cadiz – have come up. In her Derailed report, the then Public Protector, Thuli Madonsela, recommended that links between these companies and Buthelezi be further investigated. However, in the Derailed 2.0 report by new Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane, she cleared Buthelezi. Rail activist coalition #UniteBehind has indicated it would be taking Mkhwebane’s report on review. 

Sacks said he had been unaware that Madonsela had investigated Buthelezi’s links to these companies but accepted her findings. 

In other Buthelezi-related evidence, Soni read out that Buthelezi had accused former board chairperson Molefe and his board of over-remunerating themselves and had to pay back more than R600,000. 

Molefe succeeded Buthelezi as board chair in 2014. During a previous appearance before the inquiry, Molefe labelled Buthelezi an “enabler of State Capture”.

Following a stint at Prasa, Buthelezi became an ANC MP in 2016, sitting on the Standing Committee on Finance in Parliament. In 2017, former president Jacob Zuma ( with whom he has links as a previous economic adviser while Zuma was in office in KwaZulu-Natal) had appointed Buthelezi as deputy finance minister. In 2018, President Cyril Ramaphosa appointed Buthelezi as deputy agriculture minister. After the 2019 elections, Buthelezi was sworn into Parliament and is now the chairperson of the appropriations committee. 

Molefe explained he was out of the country at the time. Upon returning, he saw additional money had been paid to him and enquired with the company secretary about this as he (Molefe) was aware that only the shareholder of Prasa, in this case, the transport minister, could approve an increase. Soni then asked if Molefe paid back the money. Molefe said, yes, it was almost R1-million including taxes. 

“I paid back the money myself and encouraged the other directors to do the same,” said Molefe.

Buthelezi’s lawyers will meet with the inquiry’s lawyers to determine if it is warranted for Buthelezi to cross-examine Sacks and Molefe based on Thursday’s evidence. 

The inquiry is expected to resume next week, as inquiry chairperson acting Chief Justice Raymond Zondo said Molefe must come back to clarify certain issues. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 8

  • It is so satisfying to see these thieves’ luxury life style and arrogant behaviour being upset by the Zondo commission. They ought to experience first hand the hunger of many of the people that appropriated food products this week. They ought to be paraded down the streets in their underwear. The thieving hyenas.

  • Deputy finance minister !!!
    Almost made it, but still in a job and drawing from the public purse.
    Apart from a couple of key portfolios, what do deputies do ?
    Created by Zuma to spread the patronage

  • chairperson of the appropriations committee. He clearly knows how to (mis) appropriate money and resources. One of the few who is suited to the job! BRILLIANT!!

  • It is going to be an excruciating exercise for the ANC to rid itself of the ‘currupt’ elements in their ranks. Probably impossible ! It would require removing even NEC level ‘cadres’ (we did not join the ANC to remain poor!) …most of them . IMAGINE that ! (Apologies to John Lennon!) . There are even small elements of that in our judiciary … going by the ‘performances’ that some are displaying. A few days ago we saw an attempt to convince the majority on the concourt to agree with the minority … with significant ‘playing up’ and ‘indulgences’ to one of the two minority judges ! My sympathies to the majority who for long hours of endurance they had to endure during this performance .

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted