DAYS OF ZONDO

The ANC can remove its president, but Parliament cannot, Mantashe tells State Capture probe

By Ferial Haffajee 14 April 2021

ANC Chairperson Gwede Mantashe testifies at the State Capture Inquiry on 14 April 2021 in Johannesburg. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle)

Gwede Mantashe reveals the ANC instructed its MPs and ministers to resist State Capture – but only years after revelations of grand corruption first emerged.

ANC chairperson Gwede Mantashe has told the Zondo Commission of Inquiry that the party will never sanction support for a parliamentary motion of no confidence in its president. He was asked why the party had not supported multiple motions at the height of State Capture. 

Mantashe on Wednesday gave nine hours of testimony before the State Capture inquiry probe. (Read his previous on-day testimony here and here.) He is the first top ANC leader to account for the discussions in the party as the Gupta family’s encroachment on the state became clear from 2011 onward. 

“There were a series of votes of no confidence (about eight, I think) and not all of which were pushed all the way. My personal impression is that initially, they had a tiny prospect of being taken seriously. As time went by, [there was] more and more political pressure from the public for these votes of no confidence to be considered on their merits. Many people took the view that there was substance in the complaints being raised.” 

“Do you agree, and why did you feel it necessary to instruct [the ANC] caucus not to support such votes?” evidence leader Alec Freund SC asked Mantashe. 

“We take it [the issue] seriously, but it’s one area we think we should resist all the time,” said Mantashe, who repeatedly said the ANC had recalled two presidents. 

“You don’t vote against a sitting president,” he said, adding that only nine ANC MPs had voted with the opposition in those votes, and that only former ANC MP Makhosi Khoza had revealed her dissension. 

“The ANC, of its own volition, has removed two presidents because there were issues. We can’t open presidents of the ANC to be sitting ducks [to parliamentary motions of no confidence]. I can assure you, if there’s another vote, I will go to Parliament and say, ‘It’s unacceptable to remove your president on a vote of no confidence,” said Mantashe.

Commission chairperson Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo asked whether there might be circumstances where ANC MPs would want to support a no-confidence motion. “When the member may believe it is in the interests of the country, the republic… this president should be voted out of office?”

Mantashe hung tough. “If you allow a free vote on a motion of no confidence, we will deal with a crisis immediately. It will create tensions in the party,” he said, adding that even when the party removed former president Thabo Mbeki from office, it provoked a split that saw Cope take 37 seats. It had only ever allowed a single open vote, when South Africa legalised abortion and when three MPs opted to vote against the freedom of choice. 

“[People ask], is it the ANC first or the country first? We say it’s the country, but politically [a motion of no confidence] will be a disaster. The ANC must be able to decide to recall its president,” said Mantashe. 

“Such a decision will be cutting off your nose to spite your face. You will destroy your party. 

“We are all paying the price.” 

Freund asked Mantashe why despite many media revelations of the Gupta family’s capture of the state, the ANC did not do anything for several years. “If you had investigated thoroughly at the time, we would not be having his commission. Those allegations were not taken seriously, and we are all paying the price.”

Mantashe said the ANC did not trust the media reports. 

“According to the analysis we made, this [was] a racist stance made by that newspaper,” he said about one of the reports Freund referred to. The party only started looking more deeply when the Gupta family landed a wedding plane at the Waterkloof airbase. Later, Transport Minister Fikile Mbalula (then in a different portfolio) cried during an NEC meeting. He revealed that the family had told him of his future Cabinet portfolio before then-president Jacob Zuma could appoint him. 

“We asked Mbalula about his outburst. As secretary-general, you move with slow speed, so you don’t rush things and create a crisis,” said Mantashe.

“As secretary-general, your duty is to navigate through that stormy weather with care because there is an organisation to protect,” he said, adding that the party then started telling Cabinet ministers and MPs not to act illegally. “We said, please don’t do what is not legitimate as an instruction – and many began to do that, and many paid the price for that.”

Mantashe was referring to the regular Cabinet reshuffles that Zuma made to bring more malleable politicians into his inner circle and to the axing of state-owned entity boards when they would not bend to the Gupta network’s will. 

Asked repeatedly why the party had not done more to counter State Capture before it throttled South Africa, Mantashe said, “The ANC will try and try and try. [We believe] no member of the ANC is incorrectible. The ANC is patient in dealing with its members. I am trying to answer the question – why does it take so long?” DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 10

  • “… there is an organisation to protect.” A revealing line.

    Mantashe protected the system, not its purpose, and not the country.

    Respect, patience, hope that one’s colleagues will improve — admirable ideas. But not at the expense of your mandate and 60 million constituents.

    • Based on the line of questioning; Zuma is guilty and there is going to be a recommendation to change the political system. If Cyril stays in power I believe this will come to fruition but perhaps not before a seismic split in the ANC.

      • A seismic split in the ANC would be the best thing for South Africa and her citizens.
        This cANCerous organisation, guided by blind loyalty, protecting criminals MUST split. If the ANC survives, South Africa will not. The ANC and their primitive policies will eventually lead SA to a failed state

  • Always singing from the revolutionary hymn book, too purblind to realise that the jig is up. Self-serving, outdated & woefully inadequate in everything he and his chommies touch, their constituents deserve so much more than this. The correct correcting needs to be applied in a correctional facility

  • Explaining why the cANCer do not adhere to the Samson option (the Biblical one) reveals our rulers’ immorality. They will rather continue supporting crime and corrruption instead of facing the pain of cutting out its own cancer. That’s why they will never succeed in governing a country.

  • To quote you minister – You may “try” and try and try but we doubt your sincerity, your words and your longstanding political history and shameful reputation for doing absolutely nothing about anything much. VIVA ANC, VIVA!

  • Mantashe HAS put his mob-led ANC B4 the nation! He said it! “…a free vote on a motion of no confidence…will destroy your party”. That is what democracy allows for: conscience-driven decisions evidence-based. The mob-led ANC were given evidence over & over again, and not only by good DM! Slime!

  • “As secretary-general, you move with slow speed, so you don’t rush things and create a crisis,” Oh dear, so slowly that we are heading the same way as the Titanic. All seems fine then.
    They even shuffle cadres just like the deckchairs were shuffled. What possible reason can you give us to hope?

  • Astounding that not a single mention is made of parliamentarian’s oath of office to serve the country and the constitution; ” …… swear/solemnly affirm that I will be faithful to the Republic of South Africa and will obey, respect and uphold the Constitution and all other law of the Republic”

  • CORONAVIRUS: NEWSFLASH

    Gauteng’s third wave: It’s coming, but residents can limit severity

    By Greg Nicolson