South Africa

ANC WAR TALK

Radical document by ‘retired generals’ spurs Gwede Mantashe into action

ANC national chairperson Gwede Mantashe. (Photo: Leila Dougan)

Growing war talk by a group of ‘retired army generals’ and a document proposing the disbandment of the ANC leadership and the establishment of something akin to a military state had party chairperson Gwede Mantashe springing into action.

When the ANC deploys someone other than Secretary-General Ace Magashule to communicate on the outcome of a meeting, it’s quite possible that the party doesn’t want to miscommunicate. 

On Monday night, at a mere 15 minutes’ notice of the press conference, it was ANC chairperson Gwede Mantashe who told journalists on Zoom that a document released by a group calling itself the ANC Cadres was “mischief at best and it’s intended to agitate society”. The group is led by retired defence intelligence head Maomela “Mojo” Motau and is roughly aligned with former president Jacob Zuma and his sympathisers. 

They recently held a cadres’ forum, shortly after the SA National Defence Force issued a statement warning members not to get involved in party political matters. The 32-page document that resulted from that forum, held about a month ago, first started circulating on ANC WhatsApp groups over the weekend, shortly after the ANC Cadres’ second meeting with ANC leaders. The group was clearly not satisfied with the discussions and managed to put Mantashe on the back foot by releasing the document, meant for ANC officials and titled “ANC turnaround strategy 2025: Changing the course of history”. 

Presentation to Anc National Working Committee

Far-fetched as some of the group’s ideas might sound in a constitutional democracy, the risk for the ANC of legitimising the group, which has no standing in the organisation, by having two meetings with them and counting, was clearly smaller than the risk of ignoring them and letting them run amok.

Roughly coinciding with the release was a new wave of attacks on foreign-owned shops in Durban on Tuesday by a group calling itself the uMkhonto weSizwe Military Veterans Association. Voice-notes were also said to have been doing the rounds on WhatsApp in KwaZulu-Natal spurring people to further violence, also against white and Indian people.

The document deals with a wide range of issues, ranging from a shake-up in the ANC to halting the building of malls to advance small businesses, finding a new race classification system, assigning the SABC to become “a real national public broadcaster”, and using social media to win the information war. The group also foresees some resistance and possible efforts to “undermine and destroy” its efforts, adding that security forces should be “ready and able to ensure stability in the country throughout”.

Besides a heavy emphasis on security, the document suggests a radical shake-up in the ANC – unsurprisingly one of the main sticking points between the group and ANC leaders.

“It is going to be very challenging for the present leadership to change course,” the document reads. “It will be a difficult and arduous task to rescue our leadership from the clutches of neo-colonialism and neo-liberalism in short time.”

The group suggested putting the ANC under administration and appointing a National Task Team as “the only credible structure that should take charge of running ANC affairs in the short term”. This will include a chairperson, a “national commissar”, directors for international relations, mass mobilisation, projects, security, and communication and publicity, as well as 12 additional members.

The document continues: “In this regard credible and committed cadres should be asked to volunteer to participate in this process of strategic renewal of the movement. To this end, comrades must have a history of struggle that can stand scrutiny.” President Cyril Ramaphosa is often (falsely) accused by detractors of lacking the latter.

Mantashe, however, on Monday night said ANC leaders had some questions for the group on the legitimacy of this request. ANC leaders wanted to know who would appoint this National Task Team, who would have appointed the person who appoints the task team, and, last, how it will relate to structures of the ANC. 

“Anybody can pull together a group and issue a document and send it out in the public and confuse society,” Mantashe said. “We are appealing to society not to be confused. We are engaging with this group of retired generals.”

There were questions in the briefing over the fears of a coup d’état, but Mantashe said: “Even though the group said they are not the coup plotters, we said to them their document is not far from an analysis we made a few years ago for the threat for regime change in southern Africa in areas that are governed by liberation movements. But we said, ‘let’s get over it’, and we will not succumb to any attempt to change the regime and replace it by a few people.”

The emphasis on security is strong. “Security of our people is a critical preoccupation of the state,” the document reads. “All measures to be taken to contain or do away with crime. No person can raise arms against the state and not expect the state not to do so against that person. The country should enforce discipline among its citizens. There shall be created disciplinary tribunals to avoid criminalising citizens on disciplinary transgressions.”

It emphasises mass political mobilisation, the return of foreigners to their countries of origin and the employment of South Africans only, and the mandatory licensing of foreign-owned non-government organisations.

The document proposes the seizure of land, but warns that “Europeans”, meaning white people, will not like this and might “revolt”. It suggests a reclassification of “the main demographic groups of South Africa” to Africans, Asians and Europeans. 

The document also proposes a new currency and asks for the postponement of next year’s local government elections and harmonising it with the general elections, due again in 2024, after suffering “a bruising hammering” and losing “almost all major metros in the country” to the opposition in 2016 – ironically under Zuma’s leadership. 

“The next turn around might be much more humiliating than we think. The battering can actually spell the end of the ANC as a major political party in the national political system and a liberation movement enjoying the support of our people.” A postponement would buy some time, the document says.

ANC insiders are said to be deeply concerned about the possible disruptions this group’s actions and utterances can cause in the country, and they speculate that much of the group’s actions are to deflect from the fight against corruption and the possible future arrest of more highly placed ANC leaders.

This includes Zuma, who has refused to appear before the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture again, alleging that Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo has a conflict of interest. The group also seems to question the legitimacy of courts, no doubt partly to deflect from Zuma’s corruption case, which is set to continue on 8 December.

The document might not only spur Zuma’s supporters to take to the streets or to take up arms, but could also cause white right-wing extremists to come out to fight. 

“The posture and language used in that document is dangerously oriented to right-wing nationalism and authoritarianism,” an ANC insider said, adding that it has echoes of splits and breakaways from the party such as the Pan-Africanist Congress and even the Economic Freedom Fighters. 

“It’s certainly something which needs to be monitored closely and managed.” DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 12

  • If it walks like a coup, quacks like a coup, then maybe it is not a duck. Very concerning reading, should put paid to a bit more potential foreign investment. Certainly ‘sawing the seeds’ of doubt . . .

  • Can someone explain to the ANC and all its members that they have been the government for the last 26 years, so any economic failure is of their doing? This document looks as though its author resides in either Russia, China or North Korea, and a new colonial master is standing in the wings. (So much for neo-colonialism) The change to a command economy as this suggests would result in almost universal poverty in SA. But then I don’t suppose retired generals had too much time to study economics – they were too busy fighting their revolutions.

  • Actually this looks like it could have been written by Robert Mugabe, except his English is much better. He at least would know the difference between sowing and sawing and leaving and living 🙂
    Or straight out of a political education (euphemism of course) text book from old Russia.
    But we all know what it really is; it’s Zuma’s RET mob who will soon face their come-uppance in the courts, trying like hell to create deflections.

  • “It emphasises… the return of foreigners to their countries of origin”

    This is an incredibly ironic statement from these ‘generals’, considering that if those foreign countries that have large migrant populations living in SA had adopted the same approach in the 80s, these ‘generals’ would almost universally have been executed by the Apartheid government as ‘terrorists’, after being returned from exile to their country of origin, since they were foreigners…

  • ANC chairperson Gwede Mantashe who got of his backside for once and did something other than stopping progress towards renewable energy. Small wonder the ANC want a dictatorship till 2024, so they can continue their unencumbered looting with the blessing of the cabinet.

  • Remember, remember the 5th of November, gunpowder treason and plot….. Excellent choice of date for the publication of this article by Carien du Plessis. The document is filled with liberation movement and communist blather as well as the encouragement of illegal actions, for instance that military personnel (characterised as SANDF ‘ANC Cadres’) should be allowed to engage in political activity – they are not – it’s against the law. Carien’s summary is on-point but I take the liberty of pasting a short section of the document here for those who won’t read the whole thing:
    “We have succumbed to playing a thinking-game with rules set by neo-liberalism. These are the game-rules that serve only to create a framework of thinking that ensures the continuation of colonial domination and exploitation. We did not participate in the writing of the rulebook nor the rules themselves. The rules are prescribed, and we ought only to comply to be seen to be good. We are expected to obey and protect these rules. The game is called the Washington Consensus. In the rulebook are the following:
    • Democracy;
    • Respect of Human Rights;
    • Keeping to the Rule of Law;
    • Respect of Property Rights;
    • Business friendly policies; and
    • Good governance.
    Additional: A South African Special
    • Constitutional Supremacy and Sovereignty;
    • ANC Becoming a modern political party;
    • Reform and not change;
    • A political party should not do business;
    • A political party should refrain from having its own media outlets; and
    • Don’t touch the Constitution. It is the best in the world.
    All these rules have created solid walls within which our minds are encaged. We have been disinvested of creativity and the exercise of any kind of initiative to advance the revolutionary ideals of our people. We are caught in a whirlwind. And we have lost the strategic initiative and revolutionary momentum. ”
    This, I think, summarises this group’s objectives – they are against everything that makes for a country and nation worth living in for all its (free) people. Sadly, many of their objectives are shared by the broader ANC and its sibling, the EFF – the broader ANC are merely taking a longer road towards this objective in which a protected elite will govern the proletariat in perpetuity. The upside, if any, is that these ‘generals’ are largely inept and have no idea how to conduct anything resembling a military (?) take-over (sorry Ronnie K – you should never believe your own propaganda). The downside is that they can cause a lot of damage in the meantime. If they attempt to cross over from talk to action, this should definitely be dealt with as treason. Again, unfortunately, this will not happen as the ANC will attempt to deal with it internally, possibly resulting in policy-level compromises to the detriment of SA as a whole. They are a puerile but dangerous.

  • This is a very concerning development. There is only one form of government that could possibly be worse than the ANC and that is some form of military dictatorship by a bunch bone head military personnel. The history of African politics in post-colonial times should scare us all enough to take this very seriously.

  • Expected, some good points in their blather. The ANC has thus chosen to not subscribe to its freedom charter. The rattling of swords is disappointing as the ANC is the ruling party that has broken the economy. The document is seditious in nature and following what the police did to the whites, the authorities should investigate the authors. This is not an ANC matter, it has treasonous intent which requires that the ANC as a party and the collaborators must be investigated by the relevant institutions.