Covid-19

NEWSFLASH

The DA will head to court in an attempt to end the hard lockdown

The DA will head to court in an attempt to end the hard lockdown
A South African Police Services officer directs and checks the movement permissions of people in Cape Town. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Nic Bothma)

DA leader John Steenhuisen has announced the party’s intention to take court action to challenge lockdown regulations, arguing that President Cyril Ramaphosa left South Africans ‘bitterly disappointed’ on Wednesday night by not announcing the reopening of the economy and by not ending the hard lockdown. 

If the Democratic Alliance (DA) had its way, the hard lockdown would come to an immediate end as the party believes that its severity has destroyed more lives than it has saved.

“We have to end the national hard lockdown and we have to do it now,” DA interim leader John Steenhuisen said on Thursday, 14 May. 

The DA will be filing court papers challenging the “constitutionality” of the Disaster Management Act. Steenhuisen argued that if the Act does not meet “constitutional muster, it means the decisions taken by the National Command Council under this Act are not valid”.

“Yes, there is a threat – a very real and scary threat – right outside our door, but it’s not going to go away,” Steenhuisen said. “Remaining in hard lockdown until at least the end of May, and possibly even longer, is not good enough.” 

The DA will file papers in the High Court on 15 May 2020, challenging the rationality of three separate lockdown-related issues: the night curfew, the ban on e-commerce and the restriction on exercise hours.

Steenhuisen added that the DA believes the National Command Council, which is at the centre of decision-making in the government’s response to curbing the spread of Covid-19, is acting without any checks and balances.

“This is an extremely important case because it speaks to one of the most crucial principles in our democracy – the separation of powers,” he said, adding that the executive, Cabinet and Parliament were separate entities for a “very good reason”. 

“But right now, because of this lack of oversight, the executive is effectively doing the job of writing our laws and regulations as they please, bypassing all the debate and possible opposition that would’ve happened in Parliament,” Steenhuisen said. 

This comes after President Cyril Ramaphosa gave his fifth national address on Wednesday, 13 May, saying that the lockdown had achieved its purpose and without it, at least 80,000 South Africans would have been infected and the country’s death toll would be eight times higher. 

“The purpose of the lockdown was to delay the spread of the virus and delay infections. We have been successful,” Ramaphosa said, adding that government was considering easing the lockdown to level 3 in certain parts of South Africa at the end of May 2020.

But the DA insists this is not good enough. “We called on the president to end the hard lockdown a month ago and he has had every opportunity to act since then,” Steenhuisen said. “Yet, last night he told us to stay put for at least another two weeks. We don’t have another two weeks.”

“No matter how long we choose to stay on this side of the door, it will still be waiting for us on the other side,” Steenhuisen said. 

Commenting on the DA’s plan, ANC Caucus Spokesperson Nomfanelo Kota said: “The DA continues to show its true colours daily – that they do not value lives; are spoilers and have no programme to take the country forward. Since 1994, they have voted against all laws that have sought to bring about change in our country and the lockdown situation magnifies their tendencies.” DM 

 

Gallery

"Information pertaining to Covid-19, vaccines, how to control the spread of the virus and potential treatments is ever-changing. Under the South African Disaster Management Act Regulation 11(5)(c) it is prohibited to publish information through any medium with the intention to deceive people on government measures to address COVID-19. We are therefore disabling the comment section on this article in order to protect both the commenting member and ourselves from potential liability. Should you have additional information that you think we should know, please email [email protected]"

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.