Dailymaverick logo

Opinionistas

This article is an Opinion, which presents the writer’s personal point of view. The views expressed are those of the author/authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Daily Maverick.

This article is more than a year old

Love over rules — it’s time for disobedience in the Anglican Church of Southern Africa

It’s time for Anglican clergy in southern Africa to follow their conscience and walk alongside the LGBTQIA+ community, providing ministry to everyone in need, blessing marriages, conducting ceremonies and affirming relationships, regardless of what the rules say.

Once again the Anglican Church of Southern Africa has told the world that only certain people are God’s children; that only certain types of people are welcome in their midst; that “difference” isn’t to be tolerated and that, in this instance, if you’re a member of the LGBTQIA+ community, you’re not welcome in the Anglican Church.

Over the past 20 years, the Anglican Church of Southern Africa has been debating how to provide care to the LGBTQIA+ community. And nothing has changed. It continues to reject and oppose any attempt to provide pastoral care and ministry to this part of its membership.

The last debacle has just taken place, with the Provincial Synod (the highest authority in the church) rejecting the smallest morsel of inclusion and reconciliation offered in the form of a proposal by the church’s own bench of bishops, no less, to allow Anglican clergy to pray for gay and lesbian couples married in civil unions using a limited set of prayers designed and approved by the bishops themselves.

But even this tiniest olive branch has been turned into yet another whip of rejection!

Just to clarify the situation. Many clergy and laity within ACSA have for years been trying to get the Anglican Church to adopt pastoral guidelines which would welcome all people regardless of their sexual orientation into its midst. Such a welcome would include the blessing of marriages between people of the same sex.

The “advocates of inclusion” base their position on the supposition that there should be NO discrimination against anyone on the basis of race, gender or sexual orientation.

It’s a position held by Anglicans around the world, including by Desmond Tutu during his ministry as Archbishop of the southern African Anglican Church, and more recently, as the proposal to the synod notes, the Pope himself has called on his clergy to provide pastoral care to couples within same-sex unions by permitting prayers of blessing to be offered.

The position is supported by volumes of well-reasoned theological theses and deliberations.

It’s a position Jesus himself took, welcoming everyone to be part of his fledgling community of faith, if they wanted it. His message was clear and precise – no one is outside the circle of God’s love and embrace.

While there may be certain standards set by the church in terms of how its members should behave, rejecting someone on the basis of their race, gender, sexual orientation or any other socially created construct is clearly at odds with the way Jesus treated those who sought his help.

Quite frankly, the rejection of the bishop’s proposal by the body of the synod is an outrage.

For how long will the church’s ministry be defined and determined by synod delegates whose homophobia is at odds with scripture, with the very example of Jesus, with the position of those like Archbishop Tutu, Pope Francis and many others, and, in the case of South Africa, at odds with the constitutional rights afforded to all citizens?

Read more: Anglican Church must embrace the modern world and reject discrimination in all its manifestations

It’s time for Anglican clergy in southern Africa to follow their conscience and walk alongside the LGBTQIA+ community, providing ministry to everyone in need, blessing marriages, conducting ceremonies and affirming relationships, regardless of what the rules say.

It’s time for a form of “civil disobedience” within the church – call it “ecclesiastical disobedience” – by clergy of conscience.

It’s time for Anglican clergy to disobey the synod ruling, follow the lead provided by the bishops and, at a minimum, use the prayers they’ve crafted for pastoral care.

It’s time for caring clerics to stand up and boldly proclaim to the church structures, to the LGBTQIA+ community and to the world, that love overrules the small mindedness of homophobia and of sexist, patriarchal exclusion.

It’s time to demonstrate in loving acts of inclusion that all people matter to God and that all are welcome in the community of those who affirm love over rules. DM

Comments

timbakfi Oct 2, 2024, 04:26 AM

The choice Mr Ahrends is not about following man made “rules” or “love” but between following God and Scripture or the world and popular culture. May the Anglican Church stay true to God irrespective of the pressure that the world, including those like you, places on it to forsake Him.

Dennis Bailey Oct 2, 2024, 07:15 AM

Ach, no man.

Lawrence Sisitka Oct 2, 2024, 07:16 AM

But, of course, that does hang on how you interpret the 'word' of your God. For an atheist like me, any omniscient and compassionate deity must, by definition, be accepting, indeed loving, of all, regardless of gender orientation, race etc. Any other interpretation can only be a human construct.

Malcolm McManus Oct 2, 2024, 08:37 AM

Interpretation can often be rather diverse depending on the individual or groups leaning. Bias often clouds judgement and brings about questionable actions or behavior.

Amos J Oct 2, 2024, 10:00 AM

" not about following man made “rules” " So who wrote these scriptures if not man? Who decided which of these scriptures to include in the bible if not man ?

Skinyela Oct 2, 2024, 10:24 AM

"God himself, using men as his intermediaries" See how patriarchal this is, God is a he, and his prophets are men.... As per the scripture. I have a controversial take on this though... I find it strange for LGBTQIA+ people to believe in the existence of a deity.

Skinyela Oct 2, 2024, 12:11 PM

“God himself, using men as his intermediaries” See how patriarchal this is, God is a he, and his prophets are men…. As per the scriptures. I have a controversial take on this though… I find it strange for LGBTQIA+ people to believe in the existence of a deity.

peterwaller3 Oct 3, 2024, 08:21 AM

100% Timbak. You'll see sinful people (like me) all over the comment section trying to tell the holy God exactly what he can and can't be if he is to earn the title of loving. Let's just accept that you reject the God of the bible, so you won't be shocked if he grants you your wish for eternity.

peterwaller3 Oct 3, 2024, 08:21 AM

100% Timbak. You'll see sinful people (like me) all over the comment section trying to tell the holy God exactly what he can and can't be if he is to earn the title of loving. Let's just accept that you reject the God of the bible, so you won't be shocked if he grants you your wish for eternity.

Steve White Oct 2, 2024, 08:43 AM

Congratulations, Chris, on continuing this fight. Human sexual orientation is but a facet of personality and not a definition. If there is a God then I would hope that God is a God of compassion and love. It is postulated that God is all knowing and all loving. It's time for the church to change.

laurantsystems Oct 2, 2024, 12:34 PM

Would you be in favour of the Anglicans blessing the multiple unions between Zuma and his wives? I mean, who are we to judge polygamy?

johnbpatson Oct 2, 2024, 08:45 AM

What is it with sex and Christians? I have read the bible and according to it Jesus never said anything against homo-sexual love -- not surprising from a 30 year old wandering around the countryside with a bunch of men... He did say love thy neighbour as thy self. Filtered out in SA obviously.

laurantsystems Oct 2, 2024, 12:35 PM

There are several injunctions against homosexuality in the Bible, including in the book of Romans. Did you choose not to read these?

JessieJade Oct 2, 2024, 01:37 PM

Laura, you seem to be fighting to keep certain types of people out of Gods reach, love & church. You do understand that none of this makes you look good in the eyes of God? There are many scriptures justifying slavery too - should we keep folks of colour out of church too?

laurantsystems Oct 2, 2024, 08:59 PM

So should all kinds of sexual proclivities be accepted by the church? Polygamy? Necrophilia? Pedophilia? After all, all of the above are known human sexual proclivities that have existed for millennia....

Roddwyn Samskonski Oct 2, 2024, 02:10 PM

Laura, please do yourself a favour and read some of the late John Shelby Spong's writings. You may find yourself changing your mind.

laurantsystems Oct 2, 2024, 09:00 PM

The article is about the church and the comment I'm responding to is about the Bible. Spongi, or is it Mongi's?, writings are therefore irrelevant. Kindly stick to the topic.

Simangaliso Magudulela Oct 7, 2024, 11:05 PM

Roddwyn, unfortunately Spong was an anti-Christ who happened to be in a collar. That man deliberately went against all of the doctrines of the Christian Church held from the Apostolic times.

jacovandyk Oct 2, 2024, 08:27 PM

God also explicitly endorses and instructs the keeping chattel slaves and he also demands acts of genocide. Do you want those rules back too?

laurantsystems Oct 2, 2024, 08:57 PM

Not one of the comments above even attempt to engage with my deadly, factual truths. Fact: even the New Testament clearly takes up position against homosexuality. None of you are disputing this deadly little fact, which immediately destroys your denialism.

Willem Boshoff Oct 2, 2024, 10:11 PM

Your fundamental error is that you think your english reading of the bible - a specific canon written, selected, copied, translated, recopied etc by men - millenia after it was finally translated by people so far removed from the cultural and other historical context, constitutes truth.

Simangaliso Magudulela Oct 7, 2024, 11:07 PM

Are you saying that God or His will should be relevant to the culture and context of the creatures?

John Cartwright Oct 2, 2024, 08:46 AM

As a long-lapsed Anglican with some residual affection for that church, I am disgusted by the mean, petty and poep-scared attitude of the synod,

Rodshep Oct 2, 2024, 09:29 AM

You don't need to go to or worship in a big fancy building. If the church rejects you start your own church. Worship and preach according to your own interpretation of God's word. Catholics do it, Muslims do it, Charismatic church do it. The list goes on and on.

frankvdv Oct 2, 2024, 09:42 AM

Congratulations Father Chris on having the courage to continue the fight even from the comfort of your retirement. there is no doubt in my mind of the ecclesiastical correctness of your stance. Life-long Anglican

alastairmgf Oct 2, 2024, 10:33 AM

I’m sure the writers views will resonate with those of Archbishop Justin Wokeby, I mean Welby, in Canterbury.

Ginny Swart Oct 2, 2024, 12:34 PM

An excellent article, saying what most right -thinking believe.

Hendrik Van der Westhuizen Oct 2, 2024, 12:41 PM

How does the Anglican church interpret Acts 8 verses 34 to 39 describing how an Ethiopian eunuch (LGBT?) is baptised by Philip after asking "here is water , why can't I be baptised?

T'Plana Hath Oct 2, 2024, 02:41 PM

That's the magic of scripture - it can be interpreted to justify anything!

peterwaller3 Oct 3, 2024, 08:14 AM

Could it be the interpreters that are flawed?

louw.nic Oct 2, 2024, 01:03 PM

These guys just make it up as they go along...why the furore? Next up, "non-believers" can also go straight to heaven - no need to attend church or obey any other formalities of the faith in question.

Iota Jot Oct 2, 2024, 01:06 PM

Very puzzling, given that many of those clergy who refuse to give their blessing to LGBTQIA+ relationships are themselves gay.

charlbur Oct 2, 2024, 07:06 PM

The Bible is very clear on sin and homosexuality, verses like 1 Cor 6:9-10 and Rom 1:26-28. Yes, God does love everyone but for salvation we first need to turn from our sin and repent. Anyone in sin can attend church with a mind for repentance and salvation but living in outright sin can't blessed.

laurantsystems Oct 2, 2024, 09:01 PM

Absolutely, but the denialists don't want to hear this.

Willem Boshoff Oct 2, 2024, 10:20 PM

like you i once had an unthinking belief that everything in my english bible is god's truth. today i know that's religious indoctrination which doesn't stand up to scrutiny (i still love jesus though). it's painful to see your hubris and overconfidence when you're actually just plain wrong.

peterwaller3 Oct 3, 2024, 08:13 AM

Ah, Willem, I suppose your confidence isn't painful because you're right?

Willem Boshoff Oct 3, 2024, 09:27 AM

did i hit a nerve? my belief is rational imho; won't insist it's truth though. i rarely speak/write about this since pulling the rug from under people's false belief that the bible = truth often leaves them disorientated and troubled (as it did to me). but this hubris deserved a rebuke.

Ed Rybicki Oct 3, 2024, 10:09 PM

So: you base the morality you wish to foist on us, on a text that was written long after Yeshua walked Palestine, translated from Aramaic into Greek then Latin, by a succession of men, and then bowdlerised by men in the various incarnations of the Xtian church(es)? Please! Cthulhu rules, OK? ?

Paul Hjul Oct 2, 2024, 07:10 PM

As somebody who has been a confirmed member of the Anglican communion for 26 years the continuous failure of the ACSA to practice the Gospel it purports to preach is a continuous point of pain and disappointment.

Paul Hjul Oct 2, 2024, 07:17 PM

Some irony on obedience. Space was created in the motion for bishops to make a determination in their diocese. The opponents of the measure have forced persons of conscience who support a safe and inclusive church to practice disobedience of the position advanced by synod.

Mark Gory Gory Oct 2, 2024, 07:45 PM

walk away . take your conspicuous talents, tithes and wonderful self away from archaic institutions that barely tolerate you, whatever they claim to the contrary

Paul Hjul Oct 2, 2024, 10:02 PM

For the most part the success of the ethos of nasty within the ACSA has been through chasing out some people and intimidating others. The reality is some of us who have served lay office only to be barred by clergy from attending a funeral. But the bishops are too afraid of schism...

peter selwaski Oct 3, 2024, 12:51 AM

Rather than trying to force a congregation to accept what they consider is opposed in their religion those LGBTQ etc people are free to join another religious group.

Mary Burton Oct 3, 2024, 05:19 AM

Thank you Chris Ahrends for a voice of sanity and humanity.

Simangaliso Magudulela Oct 7, 2024, 11:01 PM

There's no sanity and humanity is what Fr Chris is saying. It's not rooted in Scripture and Tradition which he vowed to uphold when he was ordained a priest. He wants to become a law unto himself for calling for civil disobiedience against the Church's discerned decision.

petersholday Oct 3, 2024, 07:54 AM

I am not a member of the Anglican Church but grew up as a young person deeply influenced by the Christian values of love, understanding and compassion. So, Timbak Five, what is Christianity without Love? Just another group of people who can not bless, pray for or understand anybody different from us

peterwaller3 Oct 3, 2024, 08:18 AM

It's good that you know that you were deeply influenced by Christianity. The thing is, Christianity changed the world. But we should be careful before we tell God he isn't loving if he judges against some standard. That thinking leads to contradictions if you try and apply it in everyday life.

peterwaller3 Oct 3, 2024, 08:37 AM

Chris, how is gender a social construct???

nawbanksia Oct 3, 2024, 01:16 PM

Thank you for this, Chris. It's sad, but not surprising, that it has evoked some hateful responses. For those who think that scripture is the timeless word of God and for the rest of us who enjoy a good laugh, listen to Sara Pascoe's reading of a letter asking for clarity on God's law on youtube.

Mandy Schreiber Nov 19, 2024, 02:28 PM

What did we expect? Religious institutions are the very enemy of progress. And always have been. Always been more about control than love.