Dailymaverick logo

Opinionistas

This article is an Opinion, which presents the writer’s personal point of view. The views expressed are those of the author/authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Daily Maverick.

This article is more than a year old

Steenhuisen’s appointment is a crucible for South Africa’s agricultural future

John Steenhuisen stands at a crossroads, with the power to either build on Thoko Didiza’s groundbreaking legacy or let it wither. His actions in the coming months will be closely watched, not just by those within the agricultural sector but by all South Africans who yearn for a more equitable future.

This week, DA leader John Steenhuisen stepped into his new role as agriculture minister, replacing the beloved Thoko Didiza who has done groundbreaking work in the sector. Didiza was not only a friend to commercial farmers, but also a driving force behind the black farmer development agenda.

Steenhuisen’s appointment came as a big surprise, even to him, as he had been aiming for Deputy President in the government of national unity negotiations with the ANC just two days before.

A DA agriculture minister caught many new-era farmers off guard, and doubly so because it was a white man. Concerns have arisen about whether he will turn his back on them and what will happen to the work already done to transform the sector. There is still much to be done to make it more inclusive and progressive.

In an exclusive interview with Food For Mzansi hours after his appointment, Steenhuisen addressed these concerns. He pledged to work diligently to ensure that the strides made in the agricultural sector toward inclusivity and empowerment of black farmers would not only be maintained, but accelerated under his leadership.

The appointment of Steenhuisen as the new agriculture minister serves as a poignant reminder of the ever-present chasm between South Africa’s past and its aspirations for a more inclusive future. This chasm, so vividly captured in Wandile Sihlobo’s book, A Country of Two Agricultures, reflects the reality of a sector still grappling with the legacies of apartheid while striving for a better tomorrow.

The legitimate fears of South Africans, especially those who have borne the brunt of historical injustices, are not unfounded. The pain of the past is not a distant memory but a lived reality that continues to shape the socioeconomic landscape. Agriculture, with its deep roots in the nation’s history, is a microcosm of these broader societal struggles.

Didiza, during her tenure, was a beacon of hope. She embodied the promise of change, working tirelessly to bridge the gap between the old guard and new-era farmers. Her initiatives aimed at empowering black farmers were not just policy measures, but acts of reconciliation, striving to heal the wounds inflicted by years of systemic exclusion. Her departure has left many wondering if the fragile progress made will now falter.

Bridging past and future

For many, Steenhuisen’s appointment feels like a step backwards. The optics of a white man leading a ministry at the intersection of the past and the future are jarring. It stirs fears of regression, of a return to the days — not too long ago — when the voices and needs of black farmers were marginalised. These fears are legitimate, born from a history that has shown time and again how easily progress can be undone.

Yet, in his interview with Food For Mzansi, Steenhuisen sought to allay these fears. Words, however, are but a first step. The real test lies in actions, in demonstrating an understanding of the pain and aspirations of those who have been historically marginalised.

For Steenhuisen, this means more than just maintaining the status quo. It requires a proactive approach to breaking down the barriers that still exist within the sector.

It means challenging the parts of the sector that resist change, those who cling to the privileges of the past. It means actively working to create opportunities for black farmers, not as a token gesture, but as a fundamental restructuring of the agricultural landscape.

To do this, Steenhuisen must be prepared not just to be a new broom, but to fully understand and engage with the likes of salt-of-the-Earth Director-General Mooketsa Ramasodi.

Like Didiza, he should surround himself with agricultural economists like Wandile Sihlobo and Dr Sifiso Ntombela, who can use data to project and tell him unpopular opinions too.

He needs to sit at the feet of experienced farmers like Nick Serfontein and Kallie Schoeman, but also new shining stars like Gene Likhanya and Dimpho Xaba. While a brandy and Coke with the seasoned experts at Grain SA is great, he must also drink fine wine with the Agricultural Development Agency (Agda).

The task ahead is formidable. It requires not just policy shifts, but a change in mindset and a commitment to inclusivity that permeates every level of the ministry. The fear of regression is palpable, but so too is the potential for transformation.

Steenhuisen stands at a crossroads, with the power to either build on Didiza’s legacy or let it wither. His actions in the coming months will be closely watched, not just by those within the agricultural sector, but by all South Africans who yearn for a more equitable future.

As we reflect on this pivotal moment, we must remember that the pain of the past cannot be erased by a single leader. It requires a collective effort, a commitment to justice and inclusivity that goes beyond individual appointments. Steenhuisen’s tenure will be a test not just of his leadership, but of our nation’s ability to reconcile with its history and move forward together.

In the words of James Baldwin, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” South Africa’s agricultural sector, and indeed the country as a whole, must face its past head-on, with courage and resolve, if it is to build a future that is truly inclusive and just. DM

Comments

BillyBumhe Jul 10, 2024, 08:48 AM

Shallow and racist.

Johnny Kessel Jul 11, 2024, 11:50 AM

? agree!

The Proven Jul 10, 2024, 09:14 AM

"The optics of a white man leading a ministry at the intersection of the past and the future are jarring." @Ivor Price: Your repeated references to the race of John Steenhuisen are in fact what is jarring. It's frightening that you don't actually see the racist undertones to the position you reflect in your article.

Wendy Annecke Jul 10, 2024, 09:46 AM

Thank you for a balanced and reflective opinion piece, looking back and looking forward. There are still so many issues to resolve in agriculture as elsewhere. I sincerely hope Steenhuizen can duck his head and do the work required to assist and promote all farmers in Mzanzi.

superjase Jul 10, 2024, 11:34 AM

i agree. thank you for this article.

M E Jul 10, 2024, 10:48 AM

This article places the journalist in a very bad light. It contains nothing of substance and just bashes Steenhuizen for being a white man. Grow up and stop seeing people for their race and look at them for what they stand for and have accomplished. Terrible from DM to let this racist write for them!

Donald Knight Jul 11, 2024, 11:45 AM

Agree!

Lindsay Lindsay Jul 12, 2024, 09:56 AM

I disagree with this. John Steenhuisen is white. Black people have been marginalised in the past. These are not racist comments, but facts. The article is balanced and addresses genuine concerns that exist in this country. We should be cognizant of these concerns, not ignore them.

William Dryden Jul 10, 2024, 11:11 AM

That is the problem with this article and many others like it, there seems to be an inherent fear of a white man getting back into parliament as a minister whom they believe will bring back apartheid. As Mandela said during his inauguration ceremony, if you all think you can do without the white man, think again.

Johan Buys Jul 10, 2024, 11:21 AM

The most significant reform that could happen in SA agriculture is if we finally ditch the undemocratic feudal concept of about 5 million hectares of land being under the control of unelected kings, queens, chiefs, etc. The Zulu family is 2.5 million hectares (an area larger than Kruger Park), so my 5 million hectares is probably close enough for the total. Imagine if the millions of royal subjects had title. Overnight we change land ownership statistics in SA. And overnight those people have the ability to raise capital against a title deed. Sure, a number will fail fast but most will leap up to average success farmers and a number will succeed spectacularly to take over the failed farms.

chris Taylor Jul 10, 2024, 12:45 PM

Totally and absolutely agree with Johan's comments. The disgrace of a medieval feudal system is just totally unacceptable in today's world. Sure, keep the chiefs, kings and queens if tribalism is a requirement, but give the farmers title deeds and enable farming to grow. It will make the new non-racialistic minister of agriculture's job much easier.

jpvd Jul 10, 2024, 04:56 PM

Mr Ivor Price Firstly I assume your Editor dit not read this article before it was published, as I struggle to believe that Maverick can condone or approve of such “slanted”, no, racisticly based journalism. If I’m wrong, then at least I trust you will be equally critical of several other ministers ,who despite serious question marks as to their ability to minister, forget about the trail of disaster left behind them , in your future reporting. Come on man, we’re trying so bitterly hard to build! And I don’t believe this is the way to do it.

Campbell Tyler Jul 10, 2024, 09:22 PM

Thanks Ivor for this reminder that for those not sitting on the white privileged side of history, there would naturally be concern that gains will be lost. I do indeed hope that John Steenhuisen allays those fears. It is sad for me that your article results in the tired knee-jerk responses of so many of DM's commenters that the writer is racist, that the DM shouldnt allow such racist articles, etc etc ad nauseum. Once again, this is an Opinionista piece, not a news report. Read it and try to put yourself in the shoes of the person that wrote it.

Lindsay Lindsay Jul 12, 2024, 09:58 AM

Thank you - glad there are some other level headed readers out here too! Not every opinion is a racist one.

john batanyi Jul 10, 2024, 11:22 PM

I am reminded of a time in apartheid when blacj farmers were to to agriculture college and educated on farming practices. After graduating they were sent back to the homes to be farmers. After a year or more they visited the farmers to fine out how they were doing. The men were sitting around drinking beer. The agriculture promoters had not investigated who were the farmers - it was the WOMEN who are the farmers! If course that was many years ago. I would love to know what it is like today. I have watched with delight and enthusiasm partnerships between white farmers and black farmers who spread their knowledge and skills to evolve the new black farmers into productive entities. How about some reporting on this evolution?

William Kelly Jul 11, 2024, 12:06 PM

If people want to farm, help them. If people are content to sit under a tree, drink beer and be happy, let them be. A great deal could be learned from the cessation of telling people what to do and instead answering them with assistance when they ask for it. The world improvers who 'know what's best for you' and then proceed to give it to you good and hard all have track records that end abysmally (usually with a bewildered look as the mob rips them limb from limb). The world improvers that leave people alone to make their own choices and to support those choice typically build nations of great prosperity.

Jan-Daan Van Wyk Jul 11, 2024, 11:51 AM

Ivor is entitled to their opinion, and lens through which they see the world. That choice of lens does say more about Ivor, however, than the world. Or, playing the ball and not the #playa, we could consider the lens - which is racist and not at all helpful to anyone.

Michael Coleman Jul 17, 2024, 11:45 AM

Didiza's agricultural administration may have been ok but she (like the ANC for 30 years) did nothing with her land reform portfolio. Until there is serious land tenure reform of communal land developing black farmers there will always be disadvantaged, and even 'redistributed' black commercial farmers also until they are given title instead of government leases.