Dailymaverick logo

Opinionistas

This article is an Opinion, which presents the writer’s personal point of view. The views expressed are those of the author/authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Daily Maverick.

This article is more than a year old

Cyril Ramaphosa — The right president at the right time?

Ramaphosa was always destined to become President, and had he succeeded Nelson Mandela in 1999 he would have been one of our great presidents. However, 19 years later South Africa was a very different place, and many wondered if he was perhaps the wrong man to meet the new demands.

Over the past few years, it was something of a national pastime to criticise Cyril Ramaphosa. There was usually a sigh at the mention of his name, followed by “he is such a disappointment” or “why isn’t he doing more?”. 

To my question “Like what?”, the criticisers usually mumbled a list of actions, many which are beyond the President’s powers (like throwing criminals in jail).  Many journalists and commentators have also been on an anti-Cyril buzz, pointing to his lack of decisive action and the lack of progress on many fronts.

I believe that some of this is because of Ramaphosa’s personality and management style, which is not the traditional bull-in-a-china-shop – generally regarded as a sign of strength. He consults widely and includes others in his thinking before making decisions. And, yes, contrary to popular belief, he does make decisions – even unpopular ones – just not necessarily in the way or time frame we want or expect him to. 

This has not only helped him to survive for decades – especially during the Zuma years – in a divided ANC, but was also a strength during the Covid crisis. His leadership during that time, which involved constant consultation with medical and scientific experts, is still widely lauded internationally in contrast with that of Donald Trump and Boris Johnson. 

Still, the rapid change that so many of us hoped for when Ramaphosa became President didn’t materialise, and it left many, including me, disappointed and wondering if he was perhaps the “right president, at the wrong time”. 

Ramaphosa was always destined to become President, and had he succeeded Nelson Mandela in 1999 he would have been one of our great presidents. However, 19 years later, South Africa was a very different place, and many wondered if he was perhaps the wrong man to meet the new demands. 

Dealt a bad hand

It must be said that Ramaphosa was dealt a bad hand when he became President in 2018. 

There was corruption, State Capture and a deeply divided ANC. No one in the ANC – including Ramaphosa – fully comprehended the extent of State Capture during the Zuma years until the Zondo Commission laid it all bare. In addition, those who had lost their political cover were actively working against the President’s reforms. Then Covid hit and a year later, the country was rocked by the devastating riots following Zuma’s arrest. Ramaphosa also had (and will continue) to deal with severe weather events such as the floods in KwaZulu-Natal and the Eastern Cape, which hampered progress.

Interestingly, while disappointment in Ramaphosa reached fever pitch in South Africa, he was (and is) held in high regard abroad. Leading up to the recent elections, for example, all the international investors I deal with frequently wanted him to remain President. 

I can of course list many failures during the Ramaphosa presidency, which are evidenced by the fact that the ANC got only 40% support during the election. Some of that can be blamed on him, but the vast majority of the failures are the consequence of his predecessor’s actions – not least the corrupting of the civil service and the parastatals.

I believe that Ramaphosa’s commitment to improve the country cannot be doubted. He had no need to become President. He was, after all, rich and famous enough. Still, he felt a calling to finish the job he had started at Codesa, by ensuring the economic transformation of the country. 

Yes, we have a Cabinet now, but with the many challenges that the Government of National Unity will undoubtedly face, I cannot think of any other politician in South Africa who can keep this diverse bunch of mostly immature politicians together.

So yes, Cyril Ramaphosa is not perfect, but then again nobody is. The bottom line is that there is no one else in South Africa who could in the foreseeable future step successfully into his shoes.

As much as there were questions about whether he was the right man for the job during his first term, he is undoubtedly the right president for our country right now.

So, perhaps we should all lay off the Cyril-bashing for a while and give him and his new team some time and space to govern and improve things in the country.  DM

Comments

Sari Botha Jul 1, 2024, 09:51 AM

How long does CR need to make meaningful change in SA to improve lives of the poor? Not to throw grants at them, but to extend the opportunities available to the rest of us?

Karl Sittlinger Jul 1, 2024, 10:41 AM

You are being way to kind and forgiving. The question why CR is such a disappointment is easily answered, just a few examples: 1.) Lack of action for the outcome of the Zondo commission for instance should really be on your list here. Clear reasons for all the corruption were laid out, procurement, cadre deployment and actual names (Good old Gwede for instance), show exactly were our main problems are, just about nothing has been done about it. On the topic of cadre deployment endless courtcases against the DA (and pls don't give me the old adage that all parties do so, what the ANC does here goes way beyond that and you know it) is all we got. Extremely inflated tenders and procurement based on BEE is a cesspool of waste and corruption at this point, but rather than fixing it we see the ANC doubling down. 2.) Phala Phala, couple of million under the couch nothing to see here right? 3.) The Zuma pardoning fiasco, justice really is not a word we can use here. A criminal was basically let off the hook out of fear and party loyalty. And those are just off the top of my head. And yes, the president of this country does have a direct impact on these topics, the buck does stop with him. Lifestyle audits etc have been promised and delayed, useless ministers (like Gwede and Cele) were being protected and left in positions of power, be damned the country. Decisions that could really help people are being done with party in mind not country (there is absolutely no reason not to give the Western Cape its own power over rail for instance except that it makes the ANC and the Taxi industry they support look bad and lose money). Consistently when faced with the decision whether it's country, party or connected individuals, country often comes last and CR is at least in part responsible for this, even before he was president. I agree that there have been external challenges like Covid, but even here there are some serious doubts about how things were handled by the ANC and CR. While noone can deny a need to change our Healthcare system, pushing through the NHI at this point, with incorrect cisting data, no way to finance, serious constitutional challenges and completely ignoring input from society, doctors and other experts, was simply a cheap populist electioneering tool for the ANC, hardly presidential. If you are saying that CR is the best the ANC could come up with, maybe you are right, but that says more about ANC failure than anything else. Could we have gotten worse? Absolutely, but is that the standard we are aiming for these days?

Abdullah Cary Jul 1, 2024, 11:11 AM

Well you stopped reading!

Gerrie Bosman Jul 1, 2024, 12:06 PM

Fully agree, well written balanced view, let's give Mr President the benefit of the doubt and the space to do his job.

Just another Comment Jul 1, 2024, 12:49 PM

Ok. I suppose everybody deserves a second chance. But he'd better live up to his promises (try again) and not do cabinet reshuffles and other ANC fast moves to get rid of the DA representatives. He MUST put country first and commit to keeping the two fascist parties out of the picture. Trying to call the ANC out for making a deal with white monopoly capital, a "white imperialist party" (best one yet) and other racist nonsense must be treated by the GNU with the contempt it deserves. Everybody in the GNU is looking up to Cyril to lead well. I hope he has what it takes to do it this time around. Because there isn't anybody else at this stage.

Gavin Williams Jul 1, 2024, 01:10 PM

The Rivonia trialists (remember them) set exanples of probity. Gavin

joules-airbase-0b Jul 1, 2024, 01:12 PM

Does this ANC shill have any integrity left ? It seems she can't see the Squirrel for the trees.

Gavin Williams Jul 1, 2024, 01:13 PM

The Rivonia tralists (remember them) set examples of probity Gavin

oliver59 Jul 1, 2024, 03:20 PM

Fully agreed. I believe Ramaphosa's 2017 defeat of Noksazana Dlamini-Zuma will be looked back on in 30 years as the key turning point in RSA's post-apartheid history. He loses that, and our government and prospects today look very different. Onwards and upwards.

Middle aged Mike Jul 1, 2024, 06:18 PM

Hope you're right but fear that it will be seen as the point at which our downward trajectory merely got a little shallower. Until significant jail time has been picked up by the great and good of the Zondo commission report we'll know that nothing meaningful has changed. I think that the ANC holding the gun of a tie up with the EFF/MK against the head of the DA will ensure that they remain safe and well ensconced at the trough and so long as pillaging is a primary focus and there's no fear of consequences I can't imagine how we move onwards and upwards. Again, I sincerely hope to be proven completely wrong.

cwf51 Jul 1, 2024, 05:15 PM

Cyril decreased (sic) the Cabinet from 34 Ministers to now 49. It gives the ANC a 65,3% ministerial advantage. This is 11% more than what the voters voted for. This is without a more than 55% for the Vice-ministerial posts. ANC is thus still fully in charge, regardless of votes cast.