First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Inflation brings inconsistencies of the Eurozone once m...

Defend Truth

Opinionista

Inflation brings inconsistencies of the Eurozone once more to a head

mm

Born in Cape Town, Natale Labia lives in Milan, Italy, and writes on the economy and finance. Partner of private equity firm Lionhead Capital Partners. MBA from Università Bocconi. Supports Juventus.

The Eurozone is a strange, chimeric beast. Used by 19 of the 27 member states of the European Union, it has always seemed more of a political project than one that makes clear economic sense.

It was not only the unseasonably warm weather in southern Europe last week that caused tempers to flare. Concerns about inflation and rising interest rates sent European bond markets crashing, with traders feeling the heat. Thankfully, the European Central Bank (ECB) in Frankfurt moved swiftly by calling an “emergency meeting”, reiterating that it was “firmly committed to contain unwarranted fragmentation” in the Eurozone, according to ECB board member Olli Rehn. The bond market was tamed and calm restored, but fears remain.

The Eurozone is a strange, chimeric beast. Used by 19 of the 27 member states of the European Union, it has always seemed more of a political project than one that makes clear economic sense. While there is one currency for all Eurozone countries, all member states issue their own debt. 

Although European federalists continue to have lofty dreams of one day achieving fiscal union and “completing” the unfinished economic block, it remains a far-off prospect. Progress since its launch in 2000 has been made, with things like the European Stability Mechanism acting as a fiscal backstop and the Next Generation EU recovery fund providing fiscal support to highly indebted member states. However, despite these positive incremental steps, concerns about the structural stability at the heart of the sovereign bond market in Europe have never been entirely resolved.

Such deficiencies were laid bare at the peak of the Eurozone crisis, between 2011 and 2015, when European leaders had to confront the chance of a break-up of the single currency. The then president of the ECB, Mario Draghi, famously saved the day by declaring he was ready to do “whatever it takes to preserve the Eurozone, and believe me it will be enough”. However, while the difference in yields between “core” bonds (such as Germany) and the “periphery” (such as Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain – the infamous PIIGS) subsequently narrowed, they never disappeared entirely.

Inflation in Europe changes everything, and markets know it. Fundamentally, the ECB’s support for the bond market was always conditional on its ability to continue delivering its mandate of price stability. The persistent threat of deflation enabled it to provide the limitless support required to halt fears of fragmentation.

Last week, in response to the highest inflation since the inception of the common currency, ECB President Christine Lagarde stated she was planning to hike interest rates from September. Bonds, particularly of the PIIGS countries, sold off. Once again, worries about Eurozone fragmentation resurfaced. The epicentre of these concerns is now Italy, not Greece. Italian debt-to-GDP is at an eye-watering 150%. Its bond yields have jumped from 0.5% to almost 4% in under a year (bond yields move inversely to prices). If the ECB had not called its “emergency meeting”, they could have spiked even higher towards the danger zone of debt unsustainability.

At the heart of the issue is a strange game of chicken between the ECB and investors. In the case of the ECB, it is a balancing act between defending the integrity of the single currency and also acting within its mandate of not directly financing deficits. Investors exploit this and are willing to sell to push yields up and up, right to breaking point, when the ECB blinks and promises direct intervention. At that point, bond investors simply buy back in and pocket a tidy profit, a trade already christened “the Lagarde Put”. 

If all this sounds trite and unnecessary, that’s because it is. The reality though is that inflation and the need to raise rates do create an extremely difficult situation for the ECB. A “tool” to prevent fragmentation by implicitly targeting sovereign spreads essentially means the ECB would have to be willing to intervene in the market and buy up bonds of a country that was facing a run on its debt, a policy which would be construed as being essentially inflationary. To contain inflation, the ECB should be selling debt and drawing money out of the system, not buying.

Once again, the ECB will have to say it will not do something while making it clear to investors that it would absolutely be willing to do exactly that, daring them to blink first. It will be a test of Lagarde’s mettle as a central banker that she is able to pull off this tightrope act without setting off another market meltdown. Clarity on how she proposes to do this will have to be forthcoming or markets will be forced to draw their own conclusions. DM/BM

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R25.

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

No Comments, yet

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted