First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Hold educators to account for learner performance or be...

Defend Truth

Opinionista

Hold educators accountable for literacy crisis or best-laid plans will fail

mm

Jonathan Molver is the South Africa Country Director of the Education Partnerships Group, a nonprofit consultancy that supports governments to shape and strengthen their education systems. He began his career as a teacher in Emalahleni and was later principal of King Solomon Academy in London, one of the UK’s highest-performing schools, then led the Primary Support Team at Ark schools, also in the UK. 

Why should any education official, school principal or teacher (notwithstanding those who are passionately committed to what they would term a vocation and calling) care about the outcomes of a nationally standardised reading assessment, if they are not accountable for learner performance?

South Africa’s illiteracy levels are well documented. For years, the damning statistics and devastating impact illiteracy will have on young people’s lives and our economy has made headlines. For years, these headlines have led to debate over whether there has been any progress. For years, some have expressed exasperation, while others have attempted to solve this education crisis, a crisis made substantially worse by Covid-19 and the national state of disaster. If children cannot read, any further education is a waste of their time and government resources.

Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka recently convened the “2030 Reading Panel” to bring together South African leaders to ask: “What needs to change for us to ensure that all children learn to read by 2030?” The panel consists of a number of the brightest and most experienced minds in South Africa. Collectively they are working to comprehensively solve our education system’s greatest challenge: supporting our teachers to teach all of our children to read.

The Reading Panel background report states that “to improve the current trajectory of children’s literacy rates in South Africa, the education system needs to undergo drastic reforms or a state-wide system overhaul.”

The report makes four headline recommendations for a system-wide overhaul:

  1. Implement a universal standardised assessment of reading at primary school level;
  2. Move beyond slogans and symbolic campaigns to a costed and budgeted plan to fix the reading crisis in the country;
  3. Provide a standard minimum set of reading resources to all Foundation Phase classrooms (grades R-3); and
  4. Implement a university audit of pre-service teacher education programmes.

There are 13 further reports written by the members of the panel which make additional, compelling, and evidence-based recommendations to drive the system change. It would be silly to disagree with any of them, but, while they are all necessary, without rigorous accountability and robust support, they are unlikely to be sufficient to ensure all children can read for meaning by 2030.

In my view, the hallmark of an effective education system is one that keeps in mind its central purpose: teaching children and ensuring they all learn. An effective system enables its civil servants, leaders, and teachers to deliver on this mandate with strong support systems, balanced by rigorous accountability. Overdo accountability and you are likely to have a punitive and stifling system with unmotivated and ineffective public servants.

Lean too far in the opposite direction, and one risks producing a system that unwittingly fosters inefficiency and underperformance. A simple and effective balance in theory, but complex and difficult to deliver.

The reading panel rightly recommends the kind of support our nation’s teachers will need if they are to teach all of our children to read by 2030. Budgets instead of slogans, reading resources for all, and improved pre-service teacher training are all highly supportive measures which empower teachers who want to teach.

Each recommendation, of course, requires detailed and systematic planning, considerate of the varying contexts of our provincial departments and their schools, if they are to be implemented effectively. We risk undermining the collective effort if we do not get into the detail at every level of the system.

For example, ensuring every child has access to reading resources requires a detailed distribution and utilisation plan to avoid the far too many and tragic tales of entire libraries sitting in storerooms, gathering dust.

The proposed nationally standardised reading assessment, too, will require careful implementation planning that takes into consideration the support teachers will need if their learners are to have any chance of success. I am in favour of increasing system-wide accountability, but the assessment is likely to be ineffective without a nationally proposed approach for teaching reading, which in turn ought to be supported by a detailed and robust national plan for teacher training (pre- and in-service).

On the need for greater system-wide accountability, one of the panel members — Nangamso Mtsatse, CEO of Funda Wande — seems to agree. In her assessment of the education sector, she outlines what we are doing well and what we need to do better. Her final point on a list of system improvements is the current lack of meaningful and rigorous accountability within the system. She points out that “districts, schools, principals and teachers are not held accountable for learner performance.”

At the risk of overstating the obvious — this means that literally nobody in the government system is responsible for delivering quality education for all. In the absence of any form of accountability, how do we propose to make any of the recommendations the panel has outlined actually stick? Put more plainly — why should any departmental official, school principal or teacher (notwithstanding those who are passionately committed to what they would term a vocation and calling) care about the outcomes of a nationally standardised reading assessment, if they are not accountable for learner performance?

Nangamso Mtsatse goes on to recommend that we “incorporate the Integrated Quality Management System (IQMS) with learner performance”. I agree that integrating learner outcomes into performance management is the right and obvious thing to do (although this too will require careful planning and strategic stakeholder navigation to ensure effective implementation).

A strong performance management system, if implemented well, ought to ensure that where staff are willing but unable, they are provided with the right kind of support. Where unwilling, they are subject to a sufficiently rigorous performance management process to ensure underperformance is correctly and swiftly managed.

This is often an unpopular view, particularly in the public sector. However, our Constitution states that “everyone has the right to a basic education,” and in our oft well-meaning attempts to protect our teachers, we undermine the constitutional rights of our children. 

We should be hugely encouraged by the convening of the panel, which will no doubt make strides towards addressing the education crisis our country faces. No doubt this task will require a concerted and collaborative effort, and others will be brought in to support the systemic overhaul being proposed. I am of the strong view that this must include the tackling of the underlying systemic issues — namely the absence of accountability and detailed, contextually conscious implementation planning.

Without doing this, we will be pouring water on sand, and our children, and country, will fail to flourish. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 6

    • Although I agree with this comment, as an ex-teacher, there are many other problems that exist beyond the low salary. Children are living in a society riddled with corruption and disrespect for the law and this is playing out in the classroom. Parents need also to made accountable for these type of problems. Furthermore, a strong SGB makes a big difference.

  • Perhaps the over centralized and bureaucratic approach is part of the problem. Schools should have more autonomy and be more accountable. Schools are drowning in admin while not facing relevant measurement: are pupils learning and developing? The teacher’s union protects incompetent teachers: why? Good teachers could opt out if they felt their interests were protected. Surprise visits by a dedicated task team might reveal the cord ptoblem: too many lazy teachers. Poll high school students: ask them what their teachers are up to and what they see as the problem. Elite technocrats are only part of the solution. And there is a serious crisis in education.

    • I worked at a non-profit private school with excellent matric results, in JHB. We had surprise visits from the Department of Education regularly. Officials interrupted our lessons to have all the kids line up in the playground, get counted (by the teachers, who had already taken the register that morning) and checked off a list, and then go back to class. This always happened in the late morning. Our school was conveniently located near some good restaurants.

  • “A strong performance management system” must surely be the key here, and one that is directly linked to teacher remuneration. All seem to agree on the massive strategic importance of teachers in educating the next generation for social stability, for economic growth, etc, and yet as a global community we pay teachers pathetically low remuneration. We need to require accountability and we need to compensate well.

  • And to add to the literacy problems, the prescribed reading books are completely outdated and culturally irrelevant for the current classroom demographics. Reading becomes a grudge activity.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted