First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Which systems of government have handled the Covid pand...

Defend Truth


Which systems of government have handled the Covid pandemic best?


Born in Cape Town, Natale Labia lives in Milan, Italy, and writes on the economy and finance. Partner of private equity firm Lionhead Capital Partners. MBA from Università Bocconi. Supports Juventus.

Over the past year and a half all countries charged with managing that central question of politics and economics – how the state interacts with the individual – have had it reposed in unerringly challenging and chimerical ways. How best to coordinate the masses to get past this set of virological, political and moreover economic minefields?

First published in the Daily Maverick 168 weekly newspaper.

Throughout this pandemic, there has been no shortage of attempts to discern which political systems or leaders are best or worst suited to deal with such a situation. One thing has become clear, however: there is no clear answer.

Those democratic leaders who started off well and were widely lauded for their handling of the initial stages of the pandemic – take Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand and Angela Merkel of Germany, for example – have both suffered recent flagging approval ratings owing to problems over vaccination campaigns. Meanwhile, the draconian approach of autocratic China may have worked in 2020 to get the virus under control, but problems – viral or otherwise – persist. In early August, Wuhan – the original epicentre of the pandemic – was ordered back into lockdown. Hong Kong, meanwhile, shuts down any newspaper offering a whiff of revolutionary dissent.

And what of Italy, the centre of the European pandemic, a country usually perceived as an administrational basket case? After suffering the ignominy of being the original “red zone” in early 2020, owing to a relentlessly efficient vaccination roll-out, the Uffizi Gallery in Florence last week welcomed back its first visitors for months, while bars and restaurants across the traditional holiday spots of Sardinia and Sicily are back to pre-pandemic levels of freneticism. What was a vision of Old World apocalypse is now a narrative of sporting and social rebirth.

How to quantify this? Hervé Lemahieu, director of research at Australia’s Lowy Institute, has done a fascinating piece of research on assessing the “Covid performance index” that tracks the rate of infections, tests and deaths in more than 100 countries and attempts to show if political systems, levels of economic development or other factors have affected nations’ handling of the virus.

The answer thus far is simple, if beguilingly frustrating. Not one system, neither authoritarian autocracies nor liberal democracies, has been consistently more successful than any other. Whether it is the populist lunatic extremes at the fringe such as Brazil or the middling consensus-and-coalition Sweden – all have been fraught with differing phases of catastrophe over these testing months.

Democracy’s ultimate virtue is seen as being that it operates as a vehicle for individuals to take responsibility for their own lives. And yet in the context of a pandemic, while this may be admirable, it can prove to be disastrously myopic. Sweden’s stratospheric excess death count shows these risks all too clearly.

By contrast, current versions of populisms may be bipolar yet have been unfailingly found wanting. Strongman regimes such as those of President Rodrigo Duterte – who warned Filipino vaccine dodgers that he would administer it personally “in your butt” – are essentially paternalistic. These can be clearly contrasted with right-wing libertarian liabilities such as ex-president Donald Trump or Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, who have overseen humanitarian catastrophes by essentially denying the threat. Neither approach has been less disastrous. The virus, as with so much else, transcends the specific lunacies of any particular demagogue.

Yet the research is instructive. Small countries (below 10 million people) have done better than bigger ones. Islands, perhaps self-evidently, have also been more effective at keeping out the pestilent virus than countries with numerous leaky land borders.

Lemahieu names three other variables that have seemed to correlate with successful outcomes: competent state institutions; smart political leadership allied with medical expertise; and governments that citizens trust enough to heed.

The past 18 months have enforced on our collective consciousness the importance of making systems resilient in the face of unforeseen threats.

This research is perhaps informative for discerning which characteristics may be critical for attaining that otherwise broadly nebulous concept of systemic resilience.

Interestingly, a point that Lemahieu makes clear is that there has been an apparent “winner’s curse” afflicting those countries that handled the initial stages of the pandemic well but then became complacent. Could we infer, therefore, that countries that have dealt with other pandemics and social stresses prior to the Covid-19 pandemic may indeed be more structurally and societally resilient?

For South African policymakers and indeed investors, on the surface this report makes for uneasy reading. South Africa is an uncomfortably large country with hollowed-out institutions, an economically desperate populace, essentially vacant political leadership, a desperately wanting public-health system and a deficit of basic political trust, which resulted in mass looting only a few weeks ago.

And yet, reading deeper, this report may be cause for reassurance. The recent pick-up in vaccinations is an example of how well South Africa can perform under pressure. In addition, owing to the travails of South Africa’s recent and distant past there is an inherent social resilience “baked into the cake”. It can be argued that South Africans are generally that much tougher at dealing with threats posed by a virus – and much besides – than many others.

While this pandemic has pushed all societies to breaking points, South Africa has not broken. That in itself is cause for hope. DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper which is available for R25 at Pick n Pay, Exclusive Books and airport bookstores. For your nearest stockist, please click here.


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

No Comments, yet

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted