Defend Truth

Opinionista

New podcast portrays the Catholic saint Mother Teresa as no more than a cult leader

mm

Haji Mohamed Dawjee is a South African columnist, disruptor of the peace and the author of Sorry, Not Sorry: Experiences of a Brown Woman in a White South Africa. Follow her on Twitter and Instagram: @sage_of_absurd

As a child, I always sought out a kind face. I still do. But even then, Mother Teresa never fell into that category for me. To me, she had a villainous visage. And so the new podcast The Turning: The Sisters Who Left became all the more interesting and affirming to me.

First published in the Daily Maverick 168 weekly newspaper.

 I’ve always thought Mother Teresa had the eyes of a shark. Dead eyes. Ominous. Unfeeling. For me, there is no difference between the look in her eyes and the look in Charles Manson’s, for example.

In the contemporary world – and due to popular opinion and demand – it’s fair to say that Mother Teresa, that elderly, tiny-framed, white-and-blue-sari-clad saint, falls into the conventions of your ordinary and human deities.

Her life was celebrated. Her death was mourned. But so is every other human’s. I guess the obvious has to be pointed out: she was a saint not because she was human, but because she operated according to the message of some higher power and spread this message the world over where she had other sisters, who were part of her Missionaries of Charity organisation, carry out the same service that she was providing in India.

But unbeknownst to many of us, these sisters – who were forced to live an “elevated life” – were never trusted to be on their own, and they were rebuked and punished for forming friendships or displaying acts of love. Acts of love?

Their ideologies on the frugality and simplicity of life, as ordered by the Mother, were taken to extremes all in the name of elevating and alleviating poverty. But did the tiny nun really elevate it, or did she fetishise it? And were her actions overlooked and deemed more acceptable because she identified with the Catholic Church while behind the pulpit, where many a cult-like indoctrination was instilled and many an inhumane, socially unacceptable practice was carried out?

You see, all cults and any textbook monastic religions – be they Christianity, Islam, Buddhism or Judaism – raise the same questions, the first one being: Are religious communities and their strict and tightly run operations any different from what is often looked on as absurd cults?

The second question, of course, being: Between the two, is the only difference that the latter is seen as more socially acceptable because it is an operative faith that has existed for a long time while the former is frowned upon because it is an offbeat and unusual fringe movement desperately sought out by those who want to give their lives some meaning and purpose outside of what other more conventional leaders may offer? Leaders like Jesus or a divine God or Noah (whose folklore, in my opinion, does not get as much attention as he deserves – but that’s a story for another day).

Anyone who has broken free from the chains of orthodox organised religion or your bog-standard, off-the-shelf cult will know that the lines that separate the two are very, very blurry. It is my opinion that this line is a desperate attempt to normalise conventional religion. But, in fact, the line does not exist at all.

Both cults and well-known religious organisations are stockpiled with rules and regulations. They’re a mess of strict adherence. They’re a hive of ideologies as ordained by some higher power whose messages are delivered from the mouths of chosen ones.

This coercion is also known as psychological abuse. A conclusion that can only be drawn when removed from the field of obsessive adoration.

In The Turning, nuns who were part of Mother’s mission speak about the fear of leaving, manipulation and being ordered to beat themselves. They use words like isolation, brainwashing and loneliness. All at the behest of the Mother, who is said to be so dark that she tied children and patients to beds and whose stinginess allowed the reuse of needles and required people to defecate in front of one another – as reported in The New York Times.

If you need convincing of the Mother Teresa cult, listen to the podcast. If you need more convincing, consider this: her fellow missionaries had to call her Mother – a demand that falls into not one but two categories of cult leader: the delusional martyr and the preacher-turned-egomaniac. DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper which is available for free to Pick n Pay Smart Shoppers at these Pick n Pay stores until 24 July 2021. From 31 July 2021, DM168 will be available for R25 at Pick n Pay, Exclusive Books and airport bookstores.

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 4

  • Not only was Mother Theresa a cult leader, her ideology was not to alleviate poverty and suffering but to entrench it. Writings document her message as ‘It’s God’s will that you’re poor and suffering, so you should embrace that. Oh, and we’ll look after you, because we’re so righteous.’

    Her order pulled in millions of dollars and I’m not sure any of the money was used for genuine empowerment of the needy (I could be wrong). By all accounts, it was simply used to feed and treat them and keep them locked in the cycle of poverty.

  • Thank you Haji! In my opinion, all the rules, regulations and rituals of the different religions are manufactured by people, and are designed to make people bow to other people. Nothing to do with God. Also, the difference between “accepted” religions and cults appear to be a question of timing.

  • Thank you Hadji for putting religion on Defending the Truth paper. Christopher Hichens was so right about Mother T. The pointy hats and the biscuits, absolutions free, pay at the door. Religion is the world’s biggest hoax, customised for the gullible.
    Keep it up. The truth makes enjoyable reading.

  • Thank you, Haji. I found “Mother” very scary. She always reminded me of a witch in children’s stories.

    For me a cult and religion are one and the same. Religion only hide its “cultness” behind a carefully created mask.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted