First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

Local government elections: What will you really be vot...

Defend Truth


Local government elections: What will you really be voting for?


Susan Booysen is Director of Research, Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection (MISTRA), and visiting and emeritus professor, Wits School of Governance.

As anxiety builds ahead of a decision on whether or not to hold South Africa’s next set of local government elections in October, it is worth considering what South Africans will be voting for.

South Africa’s municipalities are often not worth the votes that are cast for them. Local government is in a dismal state, almost without exception. Turnaround strategies have been doing the rounds, with miniscule effect, ever since 2009.

Damning auditor-general reports have been issued religiously every year. Both the minister of finance and the president of South Africa have diagnosed and lamented local government lapses. The department of cooperative governance and traditional affairs (Cogta) has been working on constructing a parallel district substitute for much of the local operations, but voters can certainly not vote for it.

Voters, when they go to the polls in the local elections, will truly be asked to suspend their disbelief. They will be implored to trust that their votes can make a difference. This will be despite the evidence from previous elections and the periods of governance that followed.

Depending on the recommendations of the Moseneke inquiry into whether South Africa can hold free, safe and fair elections in October, it will probably be between four and 10 months that the voters have to decide whether local governments deserve their votes.

Both political and municipal governance issues will influence voters’ two sets of decisions: whether to vote or not, and which party or individual will get that vote if participation is their choice.

The difference that the elections can make politically is modest, yet significant – especially in steering more councils towards, or away from, coalition government. The 2016 elections illustrated possible changes. Zumaist politics hurt the African National Congress (ANC). It suffered the loss of around eight percentage points of support, when calculated nationally, compared with its 2014 result.

Election 2019 brought a three percentage point recovery. Stumbling “New Dawn” ANC politics and Democratic Alliance (DA) disintegration will be factors that can scatter existing party support bases in favour of multiple micro-parties that are also complex coalition building blocks.

Modest percentage support changes will be sufficient to catapult more municipalities into coalition government, as happened in South Africa’s metros in 2016. In the years that followed, South Africa learnt that coalitions are not the magic wand that brings accountability and better quality governance. Problems notwithstanding, there is probably no escape from coalitions as part of South Africa’s future local government package.

When parties are no longer entrusted with outright electoral majorities, coalitions are the future. This form of government, as argued in Mistra’s Inconvenient Marriages: The politics of coalitions in South Africa, however, will have to be rescued from its current standing as a substitute for inter-party contest, which applies in the periods between elections.

The apparent party-political argument, which feeds council and administrative instability and a culture of “eyes off the ball of constructive governance” is: that which parties could not achieve in the election (majorities, or political significance), becomes possible if the instrument of coalition politics is used. This has exacerbated levels of already deficient accountability and pro-people local government.

Coalition governments are not alone in these “challenges”, to use the euphemism of the times. Consistently, over democratic local elections since 2000, South Africa has had in the region of 30 coalition governments per election, and most of these sites did not deliver a hint of improved accountability or governance. While sub-standard governance was also a problem across the board, coalitions added exacerbation.

Voters can rightfully demand that both the politicians and municipal administrations take governance seriously – they are required to serve citizens and should be held accountable for failed municipal projects. Major trends of recent times illustrate the failures. The minister of finance indicated in May this year that around 63% of South Africa’s municipalities are in financial distress, and that about 40% of the 257 municipalities adopted unfunded budgets.

In many cases there were no paper trails of expenditures and no inclination to correct this. In reporting on the 2019/20 financial year, the auditor-general declared that only 27 municipalities achieved a clean audit (10 fewer than in 2017, the beginning of the term of this set of local governments). 

President Cyril Ramaphosa pointed out in his budget vote that municipal governance in North West had collapsed, and that no Free State municipality had achieved a clean audit.

The reasons for these problems are well-recognised. The municipalities lack skills, disregard procurement rules, do not collect revenue (at least in some cases because monies cannot be collected from the indigent and unemployed – albeit often because of incompetence and lack of systems), and do not pay creditors. Approximately 46% of equitable share, grants and other monies from national government was being diverted to salaries for municipal officials and councillors.

Cogta furthermore recognises political interference, infighting, instability and poor oversight as core reasons for municipal malperformance. As the experiences in South Africa’s metropolitan coalition governments have demonstrated, these exact issues came to define these governments.

These vices require correction. As the Moseneke Inquiry assesses whether it will be safe to have local elections in Covid times, politicians and officials must work on bringing voters a product that is worth voting for. 

If the politicians (and especially the party politicians) and municipal officialdom do not take this seriously, they are exposing local government to a takeover by the District Development Model (DDM), a non-elected governance structure. The DDM is positioned officially as a saviour, but perhaps it is a bureaucratic monster which is waiting to subsume many of the development functions that have been delegated (frequently fruitlessly) to local government.

Cogta, the originator, subscribes to the benevolent version of the municipal replacement story. For Cogta, the DDM is the intergovernmental, cooperative governance construct that is anchored in the Constitution’s sections that obligate national and provincial government to support and strengthen municipalities in their capacity to manage their affairs.

In the local sphere, municipal politicians and officials in equal measure have a massive obligation to correct local government. They need to ensure that voters do not waste their votes on municipalities that are expensive, corrupt and, in effect, inept municipal toy telephones. DM

Mistra, 2021. Booysen, Susan (ed): Marriages of Inconvenience: The politics of coalitions in South Africa. Johannesburg: Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection. Marriages of Inconvenience will be launched on 8 July via Zoom.


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 10

  • I have just arrived back in Cape Town after driving through towns all the way to Beit Bridge and back. During that journey my car wheels and shock absorbers have provided me with at least 10, 000 reasons why not to vote for ANC run municipalities. The pleasure I felt getting back to Cape Town and being able to drive on tar roads – without feeling the need to engage 4×4 – is impossible to explain. It is literally like being in a different country.

    So, to anyone truly invested in the future of our country and all our children, I have only this to say: not to vote for a DA run municipality is insanity, pure and simple.

  • Yet again due to DM omitting to mention it, it should be mentioned that the vast majority of failing municipalities are in the hands of the ANC. Good governance on the other hand is seen primarily in DA controlled municipalities. Credit where it is due….

    • The DA might run their municipalities better than the ANC, but make no mistake, leave a lot to be desired. They are simply the better devil.

      • I do not agree with that. When it comes to corruption, good governance, using properly skilled people, there simply is no comparison. The one wasted and stole over a trillion rand, enabled a man that caused huge amount of damage both economically, judicially and socially, the other has had individual events of corruption and some Tone def tweets. I generally agree with many of your comments but when it comes to the DA, I don’t think your assessment is fair and you definitely hold the parties to very different standards.

      • I guess that there is no such thing as a perfect politician or a perfect political party but at least we can vote for a party such as the DA that is more inclined to do something for the people rather than treat them with utter contempt as the ANC does.

      • For heaven’s sake, if you have the ability to swim crawl in a quagmire of corruption – please do join the DA, I’m sure they’d love to have you.

  • Even if, by some miracle, a political coalition of people of integrity is formed and the ANC pushed out into the cold, the actual tasks of running a municipality is done by employees, most of whom have been appointed during the past 25 years, and not on the basis of qualification. Will the cousins, brothers, sisters, uncles and aunts of the previous dispensation take instruction from their new political masters, and jump to it to pull the town out of its miserable demise? I doubt it. The nepotistic kleptocracies that has been nurtured over the last quarter of a century has guaranteed a deep rot that a simple change of council will not remedy. Tragically.

    • Quite correct but at least something might be done to root them out, charge them, etc. With the current situation there is no chance because the problems are at the top.

  • When it comes to governance the DA really does do better then its peers- generally hardworking and not corrupt.It is sad that most columnists and the public at large, do not concede that point, but mostly concentrate on the DA’s missteps and an analysis( generally unfavorable) of its racial policy

  • Thanks for your elucidating points. Voting in South Africa has become very complex all of a sudden, what with the uncertianty that the constitution will be upheld, the economy fosterd to benefit ALL our citizens, and the NDP actually moves forward. Coalitions sounds like the way forward and the idea of them I think gives voters some reprieve.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted