Ramaphosa's energy plan Webinar banner

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Putting politics above the nation during the pandemic i...

Defend Truth


Putting politics above the nation during the pandemic is a recipe for disaster


In real life, Professor Balthazar is one of South Africa’s foremost legal minds. He chooses to remain anonymous, so it doesn’t interfere with his daily duties.

The manner in which the Gauteng provincial government has failed to staff its newly established facilities to deal with Covid-19 is not only irrational but is close to criminal neglect.

Section 27 of the Constitution provides everyone with the right of access to healthcare services. Section 27(2) qualifies this right thus:

“The state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these rights.”

In the Treatment Action Campaign case in 2002, the Constitutional Court interpreted this provision as follows:

“We therefore conclude that section 27(1) of the Constitution does not give rise to a self-standing and independent positive right enforceable irrespective of the considerations mentioned in section 27(2). Sections 27(1) and 27(2) must be read together as defining the scope of the positive rights that everyone has and the corresponding obligations on the state to ‘respect, protect, promote and fulfil’ such rights. The rights conferred by sections 26(1) and 27(1) are to have ‘access’ to the services that the state is obliged to provide in terms of sections 26(2) and 27(2).”

The question that needs to be answered in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic is whether the state has provided sufficient access to the requisite healthcare within available resources. In addition, the further issue arises as to whether in exercising its powers in response to Covid-19 the state has acted in a rational manner as defined by our courts.

To date, the record is troubling.

It is now clear that until January, nothing of consequence was undertaken to procure vaccines. Thanks to this inexplicable lethargy South Africa was always behind the curve in procuring the necessary vaccines in compliance with its constitutional obligations. For months thereafter South Africans were told about the vast vaccine procurement — claims and promises that invariably turned out to be false.

Yes, initial research cautioned against the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine to combat the Beta variant, and there has been difficulty using the J&J vaccine because of US regulatory issues. In addition, many countries have battled to roll out vaccines. But, for lack of transparency to the public it serves, the national government is in a league of its own.

In this very publication, Professor Shabir Madhi, on any objective standard (research publications, academic rating, peer reviews) one of South Africa’s foremost experts in the field of virology, has argued that, based on a research study published in The Lancet, recognised as one of the most prestigious medical publications, a shot of the AstraZeneca vaccine and a further shot of the Pfizer vaccine is extremely effective.

AstraZeneca is accessible, but instead the state, presumably bowing to South Africa’s other leading expert on virology, Julius Malema, is considering the Chinese and/or the Russian vaccine, notwithstanding the disturbing evidence from Chile, Bahrain and Seychelles concerning the Chinese vaccine Sinopharm. The reluctance/unwillingness to pursue procurement of AstraZeneca may well be in breach of the legal framework set out above.

Can we be told the real reason?

In similar fashion, the manner in which the Gauteng provincial government has failed to staff its newly established facilities to deal with Covid-19 is not only irrational, but is close to criminal neglect.

Experts had warned about a third wave for some time, and to be so ill-prepared is an appalling reflection of the state of governance and the lack of care and concern for ordinary people’s lives. In turn, this raises the question as to who is advising the government with regard to the complex science. Politics rather than expertise appears to be the dominant consideration. 

Politics clearly influences the drafting of the regulations. How is it possible to allow 50 people at a funeral or 15 in a taxi at this moment of great peril? As much as it is important to respect mourning, for the next two weeks, while we try to get a handle on the Delta variant, we surely need to be consistent in our approach, that is, take no chance of superspreader events.

Politics also looms large in the extraordinary situation that, in the middle of the greatest health crisis faced by this country in more than 100 years, the Department of Health is now led by an acting minister who has her own portfolio to occupy her energy and time. As Trevor Manuel — who knows a thing or two about governance — argued, a dedicated appointment is needed in the nation’s hour of need. It could be the deputy minister, but why can the president not take the bold step of appointing someone from the well-organised private health sector, who would bring the necessary expertise and organisational experience to the department?

This is the quintessential time to adhere meticulously to our constitutional commitments, and that means placing the nation above the party. History will be a harsh judge of people who have continuously put politics above the wellbeing of the nation. DM


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 7

  • Why not simply appoint someone like Prof Shabir Madhi? Choose competence ahead of political expediency. Apart from the credibility, such a move would earn CR and the ANC, it would be hugely beneficial to all South Africans. Competence and integrity deliver results – but the ANC appear determined to continue selecting leaders lacking in these attributes, which causes harm to all South Africans.

  • The latest lockdown simply shows how little the politicians have learnt over the last 18 months. The same tired formula for tackling the Covid problem with very little discernable progress. We won’t be able to attend British & Irish Lions v Bok tests (if they take place at all) while we watch football on TV where the stadiums are full of spectators. Splendid work Cyril.

  • ” …. people who have continuously put politics above the wellbeing of the nation.” – that’s cr and the whole anc for you.

  • “but why can the president not take the bold step of appointing someone from the well-organised private health sector, who would bring the necessary expertise and organisational experience to the department?”
    Then I could heave a sigh of relief – especially a reset of the discriminatory and impractical management of the vaccine roll-out.

  • The incompetence and shoddy planning inherent in the national vaccine rollout will have serious consequences on the health of the citizenry, particularly the poorer people. And where is a permanent Minister of Health, who is a person of ability and integrity, and who is not just a cadre of the ANC?

  • Whilst Minister of Health paralyzed attending to Digital Waves corruption accusations the Country fell apart with wave 3. Politics killed us in this period. Delta was detected but not published, local Gauteng Health didn’t send samples for testing, new acting Minister presented all the data at long last with back up from experts. Reading from reports 2 weeks before new Minister presentation experts send comms to Govt to get additional lockdown stated quickly. Remember cases were skyrocketing but we had silence.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted