First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Investors should consider taking a leaf out of the inve...

Defend Truth

Opinionista

Investors should consider taking a leaf out of the investment book of ARK boss Cathie Wood

mm

Sasha Planting is a seasoned financial journalist and Associate Business Editor at Daily Maverick Business.

Last week I wrote about the fact that it’s people who make the world of investing and finance so fascinating. So this week I want to write about Cathie Wood, probably the world’s most exciting investor right now. Though if you are an investor in one of her ARK ETFs, particularly in the flagship Innovation exchange-traded fund (ETF), you may have found the ride a bit on the wild side.

First published in the Daily Maverick 168 weekly newspaper.

Last year, all five (now there are six) of Cathie Wood’s actively managed funds gained more than 100%, with assets under management rising from $800-million in January 2018 to $50-billion at the end of 2020. But in March 2021 the markets got cold feet as concerns about inflation rose, accelerating a selloff of government bonds, pushing long-term yields higher and sparking a flight from high-growth stocks like those of technology companies. ARK’s funds, most of which are dominated by shares of unprofitable, early-stage tech and biotech companies, were hit harder than most, falling as much as 30%, wiping out the gains of 2021 and provoking a storm of commentary.

Wood has developed a cult-like following on the back of wizardish stock picking. This is partly because of her focus on disruptive innovation and partly because she makes information traditionally accessible to financial elites accessible to the masses, publishing ARK research free of charge and openly sharing her insights and opinions on social media. By the way, ARK stands for Active, Research, Knowledge, though it is also a reference to the Ark of the Covenant.

As she has devotees, she has her detractors, who, judging from recent media commentary, cannot wait to see her funds blow up. What’s with the Schadenfreude? The obvious answer is because people don’t like tall poppies – particularly eloquent women in their mid-sixties who are not ashamed to talk about faith and investing in the same sentence. But this is too simple. Perhaps it’s because she has backed a stock that has its equal share of supporters and detractors – Tesla – and the people rooting for her downfall are the same people who want to see Elon Musk crash?

She made the call in 2018 that Tesla, trading under $300 a share and facing liquidity pressures, would one day trade at $4,000 a share. In January shares reached $816, or $4,080 on a split-adjusted basis, but have fallen back slightly.

While Tesla has an 8% to 10% weighting in three ARK ETFs – Autonomous Tech, Innovation and Next Generation Internet, she has not ridden on the coattails of one lucky bet. The Innovation ETF also has large holdings in stocks that I had not heard of – like Crispr Therapeutics (151% gain in 2020), Square (248% gain in 2020), Zillow (183% gain in 2020) and the more familiar Baidu (71% gain in 2020).

What is fabulous about Wood, for me, is not whether she is right or wrong, it’s that she is shaking up the investment universe by thinking differently, and this is what some don’t like or trust.

As she says on the ARK website, “While traditional investors seek safety in benchmarks and passive strategies, ARK believes this behaviour is counterproductive. Innovation is causing disruption and the risks associated with the traditional world order are rising…  [In] our view, any company not investing aggressively in one or more of five major innovation platforms and 14 technologies evolving today will lose its way.”

The five innovation platforms that she believes will transform the global economy are DNA sequencing, robotics, energy storage, artificial intelligence and blockchain technology, and the technologies are gene therapies, 3D printing, cloud computing, big data analytics and cryptocurrencies, which cut across economic sectors. This poses problems for research efforts that are short term, siloed and highly specialised.

In harm’s way, she says, are companies that have spent the last 10 to 20 years engineering their financial results to satisfy the short-term demands of short-sighted investors. Those that have leveraged their balance sheets to buy back shares and pay dividends are at particular risk.

Sound familiar?

Wood didn’t suck “disruptive innovation” out of her thumb. It is a way of thinking that has been honed over many years. This story is well told, but it’s worth telling again: as a young equity research analyst she didn’t have the first pick of what to cover, she had to cover the companies no one else wanted, which at the time were emerging internet and wireless stocks. She saw first-hand the value of these companies and how they had the potential not just for financial returns but to transform the way the world worked.

While working for AllianceBernstein in 2002 she shocked her colleagues by suggesting an investment in Amazon. At the time the market cap was $5-billion, it was right after the tech crash and it was down 85% from its peak. No portfolio manager wanted to go near it. But as a working mother with three children at home, she grasped the potential of online shopping. Today Amazon has a market cap of $1.5-trillion.

But these stories don’t change the fact that people who don’t like Cathie Wood have been champing at the bit over the last few weeks. They’re hoping for a self-fulfilling cycle that will feed on itself. Her stocks go down, they say, resulting in redemptions. This will push her stocks down further, and she’ll get more redemptions. And then they win.

To these people, I’m sorry to say this is wishful thinking. DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper which is available for free to Pick n Pay Smart Shoppers at these Pick n Pay stores.

 

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 1

  • I’m a great Cathie Wood supporter and have investments in 4 of ARK’s funds. What’s more important for me is that she’s a public figure in a fast growing movement of successful private investors.
    “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win” Mahatma Gandhi

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted